843
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Carbonation as a sensory enhancement strategy: a narrative synthesis of existing evidence

, &
Pages 1958-1967 | Received 07 Mar 2016, Accepted 13 Jul 2016, Published online: 19 Sep 2016
 

Abstract

Purpose: Sensory enhancement techniques, like other compensatory strategies, aim to reduce dysphagia symptoms. The use of carbonated liquids has been proposed as a possible sensory technique, however to date, there is limited information of its efficacy or guidance for clinical implementation. A narrative synthesis was completed to determine the quality and strength of the evidence base for use of carbonation as a compensatory strategy in dysphagia rehabilitation.

Methods: From 101 articles initially identified, 14 articles met the study criteria. Eleven papers described the effects of carbonation on swallowing in healthy participants whereas three described the impact of carbonation in dysphagic populations. A narrative synthesis of papers was undertaken given the diversity of identified studies.

Results: Synthesis of findings was challenging given the exploratory phase of most research activity with diverse populations described and extensive differences in research methodologies. There is currently weak, but potentially positive evidence to support using carbonation as a compensatory technique in dysphagia rehabilitation.

Conclusion: Despite future potential, existing evidence fails to provide clear direction for the clinical implementation of carbonation. Validation of carbonation use with the dysphagic population requires further research with consistent, controlled methodologies, and larger cohorts of participants to inform potential for dysphagia rehabilitation.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • The use of carbonated liquids has been proposed as a possible sensory enhancement technique which may facilitate changes to swallow physiology.

  • However to date, there is limited information to direct clinical implementation.

  • This paper provides a narrative synthesis of existing knowledge and highlights possible limitations of findings reported.

  • Research to date has used disparate research methodologies in varied populations making synthesis of current findings challenging.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Speech Pathology department, RBWH, Brisbane, Australia for support and assistance in completing this review.

Disclosure statement

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest or competing interests.

Funding

This review was funded in part by a grant from the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Foundation Trust.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.