3,880
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives in Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation after total joint replacement: a scoping study

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 1718-1731 | Received 16 Aug 2016, Accepted 26 Feb 2017, Published online: 23 Mar 2017
 

Abstract

Purpose: The evidence supporting rehabilitation after joint replacement, while vast, is of variable quality making it difficult for clinicians to apply the best evidence to their practice. We aimed to map key issues for rehabilitation following joint replacement, highlighting potential avenues for new research.

Materials and methods: We conducted a scoping study including research published between January 2013 and December 2016, evaluating effectiveness of rehabilitation following hip and knee total joint replacement. We reviewed this work in the context of outcomes described from previously published research.

Results: Thirty individual studies and seven systematic reviews were included, with most research examining the effectiveness of physiotherapy-based exercise rehabilitation after total knee replacement using randomized control trial methods. Rehabilitation after hip and knee replacement whether carried out at the clinic or monitored at home, appears beneficial but type, intensity and duration of interventions were not consistently associated with outcomes. The burden of comorbidities rather than specific rehabilitation approach may better predict rehabilitation outcome. Monitoring of recovery and therapeutic attention appear important but little is known about optimal levels and methods required to maximize outcomes.

Conclusions: More work exploring the role of comorbidities and key components of therapeutic attention and the therapy relationship, using a wider range of study methods may help to advance the field.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • Physiotherapy-based exercise rehabilitation after total hip replacement and total knee replacement, whether carried out at the clinic or monitored at home, appears beneficial.

  • Type, intensity, and duration of interventions do not appear consistently associated with outcomes.

  • Monitoring a patient’s recovery appears to be an important component. The available research provides limited guidance regarding optimal levels of monitoring needed to achieve gains following hip and knee replacement and more work is required to clarify these aspects.

  • The burden of comorbidities appears to better predict outcomes regardless of rehabilitation approach.

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge and thank the Editor and Peer Reviewers for their constructive feedback during the peer review process.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This research was support by a Project Grant from the Canterbury Medical Research Foundation (Grant no. 14/07), and a 2015 University of Otago summer student scholarship from Aged Concern Trust.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.