400
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedure

Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International for older adults with osteoporosis, self-reported balance deficits and fear of falling

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2658-2661 | Received 21 Oct 2014, Accepted 22 Jun 2017, Published online: 07 Jul 2017
 

Abstract

Purpose: Investigate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I).

Method: Cross-sectional study. Community-dwelling older adults with self-reported balance deficits and fear of falling were recruited from an ongoing randomised controlled study to evaluate the psychometric properties of the FES-I using Rasch model analysis.

Results: The Rasch model analysis revealed good category function, the questionnaire measured one dimension with an explained variance of 68.6% and item goodness-of-fit with mean square values (MnSq) 0.7–1.44. The item map showed that all items are spread over the scale, which indicates different difficulties in the items. Non-satisfactory person goodness-of-fit was shown with seven persons and showed person misfit according to both the MnSq-value and the z-value, 38 persons (40%) showed a person misfit when only following the threshold for MnSq.

Conclusions: The Swedish version of FES-I shows good psychometric properties with unidimensionality and item goodness-of-fit. Lower person goodness-of-fit was shown probably because of confounding factors that may influence the answers. The transformed values of the FES-I make it possible to use parametric statistics preferable for this population in future research.

    Implications for rehabilitation

  • The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) shows good psychometric properties with unidimensionality, item goodness-of-fit and good item reliability, which means that FES-I is a valuable tool when measuring concerns about falling in an older population with osteoporosis and could be useful in clinical settings.

  • Confounding factors such as pain, high number of falls, low fall self-efficacy, experience of previous falls, and vertigo may influence the answers and result in low person goodness-of-fit.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

The study was supported by grants through the Regional Agreement on Medical Training and Clinical Research between Stockholm County Council [521–2010-2483, 521–2013-2525] and Karolinska Institutet (ALF), and from the Swedish Research Council and the Health Care Sciences Postgraduate School at Karolinska Institutet.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.