1,057
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Understanding allied health practitioners’ use of evidence-based assessments for children with cerebral palsy: a mixed methods study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 53-65 | Received 18 Feb 2017, Accepted 27 Aug 2017, Published online: 06 Sep 2017
 

Abstract

Purpose: Evidence-based assessments for children with cerebral palsy are not widely used by healthcare professionals in day-to-day practice. This study aimed to examine allied health practitioner experiences, perceptions, and use of assessments for children with cerebral palsy.

Method: A mixed methods study was conducted in two rehabilitation organisations. Three focus group interviews explored therapists’ assessment experiences with data analysed using interpretive description. Assessment practices of therapists (n = 55) were assessed through self-report questionnaire and case-file audit of children with cerebral palsy (n = 44).

Results: Emergent themes described therapists’ motivation to use evidence-based assessments on a behavioural continuum – I don’t; I can’t; I try; I do; We do; influenced by assessment satisfaction, child and family collaboration, organisational expectation, research fit, and time dedication. Only two of fifteen audited assessments were documented in more than 50% of files. Use was higher where assessments positively connected therapists, children and parents, and use was organisationally endorsed. The Cultural Cone for evidence-based assessment behaviour was conceptualised.

Conclusions: “Engagement in” assessment appears to require a conceptual shift by therapists and organisations to understanding assessment as part of, not an adjunct to, therapy. The Cultural Cone framework may assist therapists and services in designing strategies to promote evidence-based assessment behaviours.

    Implications for rehabilitation

  • Therapists’ can reflect on where they are positioned on the “use continuum” in the Cultural Cone framework, and consider the contextual influences contained in this framework to understand their motivation to use evidence-based assessments.

  • Routine use of evidenced-based assessments for children with cerebral palsy by allied health practitioners remains generally low and therapists and service organisations need to consider ways to increase use.

  • Where possible, therapists’ should choose assessment tools that fully engage children and families and themselves in the assessment process.

  • The Cultural Cone framework may be used to assist therapists and organisations identify and design site specific strategies to increase evidence-based assessment use in day-to-day practice.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank research assistants, Alice Ames and Mahek Dudhwala, for their assistance with data management, Karen Roberts and Lachlan Stewart for providing their respective expertise in group facilitation and graphic design, and Peter Rosenbaum and Mats Granlund for their informed perspectives in the formative stages of the study.

Disclosure statement

The authors state that they have no interests which might be perceived as posing a conflict or bias.

Additional information

Funding

This project was completed within the “Cerebral Palsy Check Up: Providing the best service at the best time” project which was funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1055278). Bridget O’Connor has received support through the Australian Government Research Training Program for her Masters of Philosophy programme and is a recipient Allied Health Postgraduate Scholarship awarded under the Nursing and Allied Health Scholarship and Support Scheme (NAHSSS) funded by the Commonwealth Department of Health (DoH), and administered by Services for Australian Rural and Remote Allied Health (SARRAH).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.