3,118
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

The Big Five personality factors and psychological well-being following stroke: a systematic review

ORCID Icon &
Pages 1119-1130 | Received 19 Apr 2017, Accepted 16 Dec 2017, Published online: 22 Dec 2017
 

Abstract

Purpose: To identify and appraise studies investigating the relationship between the Big Five personality factors and psychological well-being following stroke and evidence for personality change.

Methods: Systematic searches of six databases (PsychINFO, CINAHL, Ovid Medline, Cochrane, PubMed, and Web of Science) were conducted from inception to June 2017. Studies involving adult stroke samples that employed a validated measure of at least one of the Big Five personality factors were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility and methodological quality of studies.

Results: Eleven studies were identified that assessed associations between personality and psychological well-being after stroke (nine studies) or post-stroke personality change (two studies). A consistent finding was that higher neuroticism was significantly related to poorer psychological well-being. The evidence for the other Big Five factors was mixed. In terms of personality change, two cross-sectional studies reported high rates of elevated neuroticism (38–48%) and low extraversion (33–40%) relative to normative data. Different questionnaires and approaches to measuring personality (i.e., self vs. informant ratings, premorbid personality vs. current personality) complicated comparisons between studies.

Conclusions: People high on neuroticism are at increased risk of poor psychological well-being after stroke. Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to address the limited research on post-stroke personality change.

    Implications for rehabilitation

  • High neuroticism is associated with poorer psychological well-being after stroke.

  • Assessing personality characteristics early after stroke may help to identify those at risk of poor psychological outcomes.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no declaration of interest.

ORCID

Toni Dwan [INSERT ORCID LOGO] 0000-0003-1604-3243

Additional information

Funding

Preparation of this paper was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award Scholarship held by the first author.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.