Abstract
Purpose: The validity, responsiveness, and clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure was investigated when used in a sub-acute setting.
Materials and Methods: Fifty older adults (mean age 78.2 years, Standard Deviation = 7.2; 64% female) completed the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, Functional Independence Measure and the Short-Form 36 Health Questionnaire. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure was correlated with the Functional Independence Measure and Short-Form 36 Health Questionnaire and the admission and discharge Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Performance and Satisfaction scores were compared for significant differences. Qualitative interviews with were completed with six older adults and six occupational therapists to explore the utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure.
Results: The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Satisfaction scale was significantly associated with the Functional Independence Measure and Short-Form 36 Health Questionnaire. Significant differences were found between the admission and discharge Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Performance and Satisfaction scale scores. From both the clients’ and therapists’ perspectives, four key qualitative themes emerged: (1) “Likes” about the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure; (2) Effects on practice; (3) Utility; and (4) Future use.
Conclusions: This study provides evidence of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure’s validity, responsiveness and clinical utility when used in a sub-acute setting.
The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure appears able to effectively evaluate the outcomes of occupational therapy interventions, including in sub-acute rehabilitation settings. It is an individualized outcome measure where clients are responsible for measuring their own progress and meaningful outcomes from therapy.
Evidence of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure’s convergent validity, predictive validity and responsiveness to change was found which contributes to the body of knowledge of its psychometric properties.
From a qualitative perspective, the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure was found to improve clinical decision making, facilitating client engagement, formulating clear treatment goals and making therapy more meaningful for clients.
Implications for rehabilitation
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the patients and occupational therapists who shared their views about the use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure.
Disclosure statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article. The authors also extend thanks to the Lions John Cockayne Memorial Fellowship Trust Fund sponsored by the Oakleigh Lions Club Elderly Peoples Home Inc. and Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia whose research grant funding made this project possible.
Data availability statement
The data set associated with paper is not available to third parties due to ethics committee restrictions and also restrictions related to cross-border transfer of data in the country where it was collected.