Abstract
Purpose
To examine how mobility and mobility impairment affect quality of life; to develop a descriptive system (i.e., questions and answers) for a novel mobility-related quality of life outcome measure.
Materials and methods
Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Participants were recruited predominantly from NHS posture and mobility services. Qualitative framework analysis was used to analyse data. In the first stage of analysis the key dimensions of mobility-related quality of life were defined, and in the second stage a novel descriptive system was developed from the identified dimensions.
Results
Forty-six interviews were conducted with 37 participants (aged 20–94 years). Participants had a wide range of conditions and disabilities which impaired their mobility, including cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, and arthritis. Eleven dimensions of mobility-related quality of life were identified: accessibility, safety, relationships, social inclusion, participation, personal care, pain and discomfort, independence, energy, self-esteem, and mental-wellbeing. A new outcome measure, known as MobQoL, was developed.
Conclusions
Mobility and mobility impairment can have significant impacts on quality of life. MobQoL is the first outcome measure designed specifically to measure the impact of mobility on quality of life, and therefore has utility in research and practice to measure patient outcomes related to rehabilitation.
Mobility impairment affects many different aspects of health and quality of life.
The impact of mobility impairment on quality of life is related to processes of physical, emotional, and behavioural adaptation.
MobQoL is the first patient-reported outcome measure designed specifically to measure the quality of life impacts of mobility impairment and assistive mobility technology use.
MobQoL has potential to be used by rehabilitation professionals to measure and monitor mobility-related quality of life as part of routine clinical practice.
Implications for Rehabilitation
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Professor Joanna Coast, Professor Katherine Payne, Professor Deborah Fitzsimmons, Dr. Hareth Al-Janabi, and Professor Paul Brocklehurst for acting as expert advisors to the project. The authors thank Emma Bray for transcribing the interviews.
Disclosure statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Correction Statement
This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.