Multidisciplinary visual rehabilitation in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Abstract

Objective

To systematically review the evidence for effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions in people who are visually impaired, living in low- and middle-income countries.

Methods

Fifteen databases and the grey literature were searched up until February 2020; papers were identified according to eligibility criteria, and assessed for risk of bias. Eligible studies were controlled trials (randomised or non-randomised) of rehabilitation interventions for blind or visually impaired adults or children from low- and middle-income countries. Possible outcomes included visual acuity, activities of daily living, safety, quality of life and psychological status.

Results

Fifteen eligible studies were identified from India, Turkey, Nigeria, Croatia and Iran. Six studies were randomised, seven were non-randomised trials, and in two the method of allocation was not clear. Participants were adults, children and both adults and children. Seven studies were small (n ≤ 65) and examined the effect of training programmes. Remaining studies compared the effect of low vision aids, economic rehabilitation, goalball, rehabilitation compliance and service delivery methods, including one large four-arm randomised trial (n = 436). Studies measured a variety of outcomes, and mostly showed a positive effect of interventions for pre- and post-intervention assessment, although between intervention group comparisons were often inconclusive. Overall, only four studies had a low risk of bias.

Conclusions

A lack of high-quality evidence for rehabilitation interventions is a barrier to provision of low vision services in low- and middle-income countries. Future research should focus on establishing effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of devices and models of vision rehabilitation appropriate for low-resource settings.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

• The systematic review found a lack of high-quality evidence for rehabilitation interventions is a barrier to provision of low vision services in low- and middle-income countries.

• Consider how visual rehabilitation interventions which have been shown to be effective can be delivered by non-specialists.

• Ensure that service providers for people who are visually impaired are trained in recognising depression and anxiety and have pathways for referral to mental health services, as appropriate.

Keywords:

• Systematic review
• low vision
• blindness
• visual impairment
• rehabilitation
• low and middle income countries

Disclosure statement

Mary Lou Jackson is a consultant for Astellas. Hannah Kuper's salary is supported by the PENDA grant from DFID. Sarah Wallace, and Rotimi Alao and have no declarations of interest to declare.

Additional information

Funding

HK is partially funded by the DFID PENDA grant.