2,833
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Current trends in the treatment of patients with post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect: a scoping review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2158-2185 | Received 13 Dec 2019, Accepted 11 Sep 2020, Published online: 25 Sep 2020
 

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the current treatment approaches for patients with post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect.

Methods

A three-step search strategy using the Johanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines, was undertaken. PubMed, CINAHL, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial, SCOPUS, PROSPERO, JBI, Sport Discus, and Google Scholar databases were searched. Searches were limited to publications from January 1, 2008, to May 1, 2020. Critical appraisal was undertaken by two independent reviewers using a standardized critical appraisal instrument developed by JBI. Data were extracted using a study-specific charting table.

Results

A total of 3,648 articles were identified, 311 full-text articles were screened and 86 articles were critically appraised, with 83 articles included in the review. Intervention approaches for post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect symptom amelioration were identified and categorized as prism adaptation and visual scanning, mental practice and mirror therapy, electrical stimulation and robotics, combination therapy, pharmacological therapy, and other interventions. Both positive and negative results across identified interventions were identified without specific reference to the phase of recovery.

Conclusion

This review provides insight into current interventions for post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect. A plethora of intervention studies have been explored to ameliorate neglect symptoms post-stroke.

    IMPLICATION FOR REHABILITATION

  • Prism adaptation (PA) and combination therapy are most commonly investigated intervention for unilateral spatial neglect (USN) and showed promise in ameliorating USN symptoms.

  • No single treatment approach seems optimally superior in the rehabilitation of USN post-stroke.

  • Evidence for the selection of treatment at a specific phase of recovery is not conclusive as both positive and negative outcome on neglect measure were observed across all treatment approaches without specific reference to the phase of recovery.

  • Evidence for the long-term use of PA in USN rehabilitation appears to be modest.

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Dr Ajidahun Adedayo and Ms Kedibone Moagi for assisting with the literature search process in this study. Also, we want to profoundly thank Dr Juliet Nwachukwu-Umeonwuka for assisting with the quality assessment of the articles.

Disclosure statement

The Author(s) declare(s) that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

The work was supported for postgraduate degree funding received from the University of Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical Endowment Fund.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.