https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6653-1048
![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
Abstract
Purpose
To systematically search for current research on the role of resilience in the physical rehabilitation of SCI and describe the research to date.
Materials and methods
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach was used. Five databases were searched for papers published up to March 2020. The sample included adults who have sustained an SCI; outcomes included a physical rehabilitation outcome and a measure of psychological or personal resilience/resilience training.
Results
The initial search found 2074 studies. 12 studies were included. Six suggest positive effects of resilience on physical functioning/recovery, six report resilience as not affecting physical functioning/recovery.
Conclusions
Resilience may positively affect physical outcomes; however, the relationship is under-researched and contrasting findings may be due to measurements and methods employed by research. Future research may distinguish between two sources of resilience following an SCI: prior resilient experiences, and resilience as a product of the injury. Individuals’ past events that triggered resilient behaviour may be able to promote a resilient response to an SCI. Focussing on emotional coping may result in poorer outcomes than building a sense of control. Resilience training may affect psychosocial rehabilitation; it is difficult to establish if it would affect physical outcomes. A negative approach to an injury can have negative effects on functioning; when identifying patients for psychoeducational training, those with the presence of negative appraisals of their injury are most in need.
Resilience may positively affect physical outcomes; however, the relationship is under-researched.
Individuals’ past events that triggered resilient behaviour may be able to promote a resilient response to an SCI.
Focussing on emotional coping may result in poorer outcomes than building a sense of control.
When identifying patients for psychoeducational training, it may be those with the presence of negative appraisals of their injury that are most in need.
IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Mr. Ross Duncan from Spinal Life Australia for his thoughtful review of the manuscript.
Disclosure statement
The third author, Billy Hedderman (BH), suffered a spinal cord injury in 2014. The research question for this review arose from his experience of rehabilitation and recovery. This is openly discussed in the manuscript under the Methods section. To explore current research, the PRISMA systematic review approach was undertaken. This approach tackles bias by using strict search terms and review methodology. Further, this author did not take part in the selection of search terms, title review or abstract review. No other conflicts of interest are reported.
