366
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Investigating the peer Mentor-Mentee relationship: characterizing peer mentorship conversations between people with spinal cord injury

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 962-973 | Received 11 Feb 2021, Accepted 19 Feb 2022, Published online: 26 Mar 2022
 

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to: (1) develop a coding manual to characterize topics discussed and conversation techniques used during peer mentorship conversations between people with spinal cord injury (SCI); (2) assess the reliability of the manual; and (3) apply the manual to characterize conversations.

Materials/Methods

The study was conducted in partnership with three Canadian provincial SCI organizations. Twenty-five phone conversations between SCI peer mentors and mentees were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Ten transcripts were inductively analyzed to develop a coding manual identifying topics and techniques used during the conversations. Inductive technique codes were combined and deductively linked to motivational interviewing and behaviour change techniques. Two coders independently applied the coding manual to all transcripts. Code frequencies were calculated.

Results

The coding manual included 14 topics and 31 techniques. The most frequently coded topics were personal information, recreational programs, and chronic health services for mentors and mentees. The most frequently coded techniques were giving personal information, social smoothers, and closed question for mentors; and giving personal information, social smoothers, and sharing perspective for mentees.

Conclusion

This research provides insights into topics and techniques used during real-world peer mentorship conversations. Findings may be valuable for understanding and improving SCI peer mentorship programs.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • SCI peer mentorship conversations address a wide range of rehabilitation topics ranging from acute care to living in the community.

  • Identification of the topics discussed, and techniques used in SCI peer mentorship conversations can help to inform formalized efforts to train and educate acute and community-based rehabilitation professionals.

  • Identifying commonly discussed topics in SCI peer mentorship conversation may help to ensure that peer mentors are equipped with the necessary knowledge and resources, or the development of those resources be prioritized.

  • Developing a method to characterize the topics discussed and techniques used during SCI peer mentorship conversations may aid in designing methods to evaluate how rehabilitation professionals provide support to people with SCI.

Data deposition

The dataset generated and analyzed during the current study are available on Open Science Framework (see osf.io/qszr9).

Ethical approval

We certify that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical participation of human volunteers were followed during the course of this research. All methods were approved by the University of British Columbia Research Ethics Board.

Author contributions

HG, SS, SC, TC, and CB contributed to the conceptualization of this research and funding acquisition. HG, SS, SC, TC, CM, and RM contributed to the development of the methodology. RM, EG, and KB contributed to data collection. RM, EG, KB, and HG contributed to data analysis. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the research findings. RM was responsible for writing the original manuscript draft. All authors contributed to reviewing and approved the final draft. HG provided supervision throughout all research activities.

Disclosure statement

The authors do not have competing financial interests in relation to the work.

Additional information

Funding

This project was supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada grant [#430-2016-00918], Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar Award [#16910], and UBC Hampton Fund Research Grant in the Humanities and Social Sciences New Faculty Award.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.