Abstract
Purpose
Forty percent of stroke survivors have a persistent lack of function in the upper limb, causing significant disability. Most personal-care tasks and meaningful activities require bi-manual function of both upper limbs. However, lower-limb mobility is often viewed as the priority in stroke services. Perspectives of stroke survivors on priorities for upper-limb recovery and therapy have not been investigated in detail. Therefore, this study aimed to explore their views.
Materials and methods
Thirteen stroke survivors each engaged in up to four semi-structured interviews over 18 months. A phenomenological approach guided the research.
Results
Three themes were identified. Priorities change on coming home: recovery of walking is a priority early after stroke but upper-limb recovery becomes equally important over time, particularly once living at home. Limited therapy services: therapy has a short duration, prioritizes lower-limb mobility, and is short-lived in the community; people feel abandoned by services. Active partners in recovery: stroke survivors want intermittent access to review and advice so they can be active partners with therapists to manage their upper-limb recovery.
Conclusion
Therapy services should recognize stroke survivors’ changing priorities and work with them as active partners in upper-limb recovery. Intermittent access to review and advice should be included in service design.
Stroke survivors’ priorities may change over time from recovery of walking toward upper-limb recovery.
Post-stroke services can be perceived as insufficient to meet the needs of stroke survivors who want to participate actively in rehabilitation of their upper limb.
Stroke survivors may prefer services that are more flexible to provide regular review of their progress, access to guidance and support to self-manage their recovery.
Implications for rehabilitation
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the participants who were involved in this study. Without their time and willingness to share their experiences this research would not have been possible. Also, thanks are due to the Physiotherapy Research Foundation for a grant that part-funded the research.
Authors’ note
All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship of this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole and have given their approval for this version to be published.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.