252
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

The content and characteristics of face-to-face interventions to encourage patients’ enrollment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2734-2746 | Received 28 Feb 2023, Accepted 07 Jul 2023, Published online: 21 Jul 2023
 

Abstract

Purpose

To provide an overview of the content and characteristics of face-to-face interventions to encourage enrollment in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR).

Methods

Following a published protocol describing the methods, six databases were searched. The search was limited to studies published from January 2000 to December 2021. Two reviewers independently performed study selection and data extraction.

Results

5583 studies were identified and 20 studies with a variety of study designs met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies specified important content in face-to-face interventions to be: Education, problem-solving, support of autonomy, exploring reasons for change, emotional and cognitive support while showing understanding. Studies targeting patients’ experiences used motivational interviewing and addressed worries and anticipated difficulties. Intention to attend, CR barriers, practical barriers, exercise self-efficacy, and patients asking questions supported enrollment. Reassurance could lead to nonattendance if patients had a high degree of worry and distress.

Conclusion

Face-to-face interventions are important to support patients’ enrollment in CR and should integrate a person-centered dialogue exploring reasons for change and providing support to overcome barriers. Focus on the patients’ perspectives, the mechanisms of change, and the evaluation of the intervention to inform implementation should be further explored.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • In-hospital face-to-face interventions support enrollment in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients with ischemic heart disease.

  • This study suggests that individual worries and barriers toward CR should be jointly explored while considering patients’ capacity for making choices as well as their vulnerability.

  • Patients should be encouraged to ask questions.

  • A too strong focus on reassurance and problem-solving can impede enrollment.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Department of Physio- and Occupational Therapy, Horsens Regional Hospital, Denmark, and received no funding. Thanks to research secretary Line Jensen, MA, Horsens Regional Hospital, Denmark, for language revision and to librarian, Karin Friis Velbæk, Medical Library, Viborg Regional Hospital for reviewing the search strategy.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The Department of Physio-and Occupational therapy, Horsens Regional Hospital, Denmark, funded this research. The research research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.