Abstract
Purpose
To examine changes in self-determination associated with youth participation in residential immersive life skills (RILS) programs.
Method
In this prospective mixed methods study, the Arc’s Self-Determination Scale was administered pre- and post-program, and at 3- and 12-month follow-ups, to 27 RILS youth and a comparison group of 11 youth enrolled in a non-residential life skills program. Ten RILS youth were interviewed 3 and 12 months post-program, with content analysis used to explore changes in autonomy, self-realization, and psychological empowerment.
Results
RILS youth showed statistically significant increases in autonomy immediately after the program, which were maintained one year later, whereas the comparison group displayed increased autonomy only at 3 months post-program. Qualitatively, RILS youth emphasized changes in behavioral autonomy and psychological empowerment 3 months post-program, whereas at one year there was greater emphasis on changes in self-realization. Using a triangulation protocol, the mixed methods data were interpreted as showing agreement regarding changes in autonomy due to intervention, partial agreement regarding self-realization, and dissonance regarding psychological empowerment.
Conclusions
RILS programs can enhance the autonomy of youth with physical disabilities and contribute to their sense of confidence and understanding of themselves as they move forward in life.
IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION
The findings suggest the importance of the immersive, away-from-home component of residential immersive life skills programs in enhancing the autonomy of youth with disabilities
Youth reported changes in their level of autonomy after attending residential immersive life skills programs, as well as feeling more confident in living on their own
Residential immersive life skills programs can contribute to youth’s understanding of themselves as they transition to adulthood
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the contributions of team members involved with data collection, including Jesiqua Rapley, Alanna Rudzik, and Madhu Pinto. We also acknowledge the contributions of other members of the Ontario Independence Program Research (OIPR) team and extend our appreciation to Madhu Pinto for assistance with the analyses and to Revi Bondar for assistance with the qualitative coding.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).