529
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Why Can't They Agree? The Underlying Complexity of Contact and Residence Disputes

&
Pages 347-360 | Published online: 12 Dec 2010
 

Abstract

The Children Act 1989 gave priority to the welfare of children when family courts make orders for residence and contact. As a consequence, other issues came to be viewed as less significant. In this article, we examine the court records of three County Courts to determine to what extent the disputes that parents bring to court are actually about children (seen as legitimate concerns) as opposed to other matters (seen as illegitimate concerns). Our findings indicate that underpinning legitimate concerns over children are a multitude of other ‘illegitimate’ issues such as quantum of child support and unresolved anger between the parents that remain central to parents' concerns. We conclude that, although a return to adjudicating ‘blame’ and ‘guilt’ would be a regressive step, it might be sensible to try to find a way of acknowledging these arguments as this may aid resolving conflicts between parents to the benefit of their children.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.