1,177
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CASES

‘Shifting the place of social security’: The ‘Bedroom Tax’, discrimination and discretionary housing payments

 

Abstract

The High Court held that the changes to Housing Benefit under the Social Sector Size Criteria (reg.B15, Housing Benefit Regulations 2006 (SI 213)) were not unlawfully discriminatory contrary to Article 14 and did not violate s.149 Equality Act 2010. Although the regulations were held to be discriminatory, the Court was satisfied that the provision of Discretionary Housing Payments constituted a proportionate approach, and that the changes were not ‘manifestly without reasonable foundation’ and as an area of ‘high policy’ were therefore justified. The Court distinguished the case from Burnip due to the lack of a ‘discrete group’ of affected claimants. The Court was critical of the Secretary of State's failure to introduce new legislation to account for the exemption for disabled children unable to share a room in Burnip.

Notes

1. Amended by the Housing Benefit (Amendment) Regulations 2012 (SI 3040).

2. Discretionary Financial Assistance Regulations 2001, SI 2001/1167 and Discretionary Housing Payments (Grants) Order 2001, SI 2001/2340.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.