454
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reports

Visuospatial working memory, auditory discrimination, and attention

, &
Pages 568-574 | Received 09 May 2018, Accepted 27 Sep 2018, Published online: 11 Oct 2018
 

ABSTRACT

The present study examined the degree to which tests of visuospatial storage capacity tap into domain-general storage and attention processes. This was done by comparing performance of visuospatial memory tasks with performance on sound-based sensory discrimination tasks. We found that memory task- and discrimination task performance both tapped into a cross-modality factor (visual and auditory). We further examined the degree to which this common variance could be explained by attention control and sustained attention. These attention factors accounted for roughly 60% of the variance in memory. This indicates that tests of visuospatial memory capacity reflect more than modality-specific memory.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 Correlations between our DVs and the one described were .94 for PVT, .80 for CRT, and .95 for SART, Reliabilities, on the other hand, were substantially reduced when SD was divided by RT. Thus, we retained our original DV.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.