This paper analyses positions adopted in S. Borg's ‘Language Awareness as Methodology’ (Language Awareness, 1994) from the points of view of linguistics and the philosophy of science. Language awareness is valuable in language teaching. It appears, however, to lack coherent theoretical and methodological underpinnings. In particular, some attitudes in language awareness are inconsistent with fundamental thinking in linguistics and the philosophy of science. A coherent view of language awareness must incorporate commonplace components and distinctions in linguistics and views of method and theory in the philosophy of science. There is no need for language awareness to repeat the mistakes and long process of development which has gone on in linguistics.
Language awareness and linguistics: A response to S. Borg
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.