239
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Interplay between foraging behaviour, adult density and fruit ripeness determines the effectiveness of gibberellic acid and host-marking pheromone in reducing susceptibility of grapefruit to infestation by the Mexican fruit-fly, Anastrepha ludens

, , &
Pages 321-328 | Received 28 Jun 2011, Accepted 05 Jul 2011, Published online: 11 Oct 2011
 

Abstract

The potential of gibberellic acid (GA3) and host-marking pheromone as management tools for control of Mexican fruit-fly (Anastrepha ludens) was evaluated in the field. Varying numbers of GA3-treated and untreated “Ruby Red” grapefruit were hung in branches of field-caged citrus trees and exposed to four different densities of gravid A. ludens females (1, 5, 15 and 30 individuals per cage) over the entire harvest season (October to February). Infestation was not lowered by GA3-treatment when fly density was set at 0.06, 0.19 and 0.38 females per fruit. Results depended mainly on fruit ripeness and female density. A reduction in infestation (almost eight-fold) was recorded at a fly density of one female per 200 fruit (0.0005 female/fruit rate), when fruit was treated with 15 ppm of GA3 (applied once) and exposed to flies early in the harvest season (November). At a higher GA3 concentration (20 ppm applied twice) and a fly density of 30 females per 100 fruit (0.3 female/fruit rate), no statistically significant reduction in damage was recorded. Late in the season, when untreated fruit were overripe (i.e. were of poor quality), there was a tendency for females to preferentially oviposit into GA3-treated (and therefore superior quality) fruit. We also tested the combined effect of GA3 and host-marking pheromone and pheromone-treated fruit on the oviposition behaviour of A. ludens and found that the presence of pheromone, with or without GA3, reduced infestation to nearly zero. Wediscuss our findings in the context of the interplay between oviposition behaviour, fly density and fruit ripeness (i.e. the season) and the complexities involved in the design of biorational fruit-fly management schemes.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Bigurra-Armida family for allowing us to work in their citrus grove. We also thank Anabel Dávila, Norma Lozada, Isabel Jácome, Jaime Piñero, Graciano Blas, Fernando Gómez, Alejandro Vázquez, Octaviano Díaz and Cesar Ruíz for technical assistance. Rogelio Macías-Ordóñez provided expert advice on data analysis and ran some of the statistical tests reported here. We also thank John Sivinski, Francisco Díaz-Fleischer, Caroline Fowler, and three anonymous referees for comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. Finally, we thank Alberto Anzures for helping us format the manuscript and all the figures. Mention of a commercial or proprietary product does not constitute an endorsement by any of the authors or institutions. We would like to acknowledge for financial support: the United States Department of Agriculture (Grant 58-6615-3-006), Fondo de Estudios de Investigaciones Ricardo J. Zevada and Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural y Pesca – Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (SAGARPA-IICA) through the Campaña Nacional contra las Moscas de la Fruta.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.