Compare and contrast: understanding Irish migration to Britain in a wider context

Abstract

This article explores the potential for comparative research across different migrant groups. Research on migration is often weakened by the marked tendency to use a single ethnic/national group as the unit of analysis. Analysing migration from the experiences of a particular ethnic group may exaggerate ethnic exceptionalism and understate the extent to which experiences are shared across different migrant groups. My recent experiences on a range of research projects with diverse migrants to London made me think about similarities with the Irish, but each in different ways. However, there is a dearth of comparative analysis in relation to the Irish experience in Britain. On the one hand, there are many studies of Irish migrants, but these tend to focus solely on the Irish or else examine the relationship between Irish migrants and the ‘native’ British population. There has been little work on how the Irish relate to other migrant groups within British society. On the other hand, studies of other migrant communities rarely refer to the Irish as a comparative group. The article explores the reasons for the dearth of comparative work involving Irish migrants in Britain. In so doing, it considers some of the benefits and challenges of going beyond the ‘ethnic lens’. What would be gained but also lost by viewing Irish migration to Britain through a more comparative perspective? I explore how such comparative analysis might contribute, firstly, to a wider understanding of migration processes, experiences and inter-migrant relations, and, secondly, to a fuller appreciation of varied dimensions of migratory experiences in Britain. These issues are considered through a comparison of Polish and Irish migration to Britain.

Keywords:

• comparative research
• migration
• ethnic exceptionalism
• historical myopia

Notes

 1. Jackson, The Irish in Britain.

 2. Hickman and Walter, Discrimination and the Irish Community in Britain; Walter, Outsiders Inside.

 3. Hickman, Religion, Class and Identity; Gray, Women and the Irish Diaspora.

 4. Walter, Outsiders Inside, 87.

 5. Curtis, Nothing But the Same Old Story.

 6. Ryan, ‘Aliens, Migrants and Maids’; Douglas, ‘Anglo-Saxons and Attacotti’.

 7. Hickman, ‘Reconstructing Deconstructing “Race”’; Ryan, ‘Aliens, Migrants and Maids’; Douglas, ‘Anglo-Saxons and Attacotti’.

 8. Hillyard, Suspect Community.

 9. Belchem and Tenfelde, Irish and Polish Migration in Comparative Perspective, 7.

10. Mahler and Pessar, ‘Gender Matters’.

11. Glick Schiller and Caglar, ‘Towards a Comparative Theory of Locality in Migration Studies’, 177.

12. Ryan and Webster, Gendering Migration.

13. Ryan, ‘Moving Spaces and Changing Places’; ‘Who Do You Think You Are?’; ‘Migrant Women, Social Networks and Motherhood’; ‘Family Matters’.

14. Ryan et al., ‘Social Networks, Social Support and Social Capital’.

15. Ryan, Kofman, and Aaron, ‘ Insiders and Outsiders’; Ryan, ‘Muslim Women Negotiating Collective Stigmatisation’.

16. Ryan and Mulholland, ‘Trading Places’.

17. Walter, Irish Women in London.

18. Ryan et al., ‘Depression in Irish Migrants’.

19. Mortensen, Cantor-Graae, and McNeil, ‘Increased Rates of Schizophrenia among Immigrants’.

20. Mills, Knight, and Green, Beyond Boundaries.

21. Garapich, The Unwanted.

22. Julia Brannen et al., ‘Fathers across Three Generations’, ESRC-funded Research Study, 2011.

23. Hickman et al., ‘Suspect Communities’, ESRC-funded Research Study, 2011.

24. Donato et al., ‘A Glass Half Full?’

25. Donato et al., ‘A Glass Half Full?’, 15.

26. Donato et al., ‘A Glass Half Full?’

27. Westwood and Phizacklea, Transnationalism and the Politics of Belonging; Webster, Imagining Home.

28. Kofman, ‘Family-related Migration’, 649.

29. McDowell, Hard Labour.

30. Webster, Imagining Home.

31. Hickman, ‘Reconstructing Deconstructing “Race”’, 299.

32. Hickman, ‘Reconstructing Deconstructing “Race”’, 289.

33. Hickman and Walter, Discrimination and the Irish Community.

34. Walls and Williams, ‘Sectarianism at Work’, 656.

35. Webster, Imagining Home.

36. Walter, Outsiders Inside.

37. Interestingly, the few studies that did include the Irish within a wider study of migration have tended to be local, community studies such as Rex and Moore's 1960s study of community conflict in Sparkbrook and Richmond and Lyon's 1970s study of migration in Bristol. Perhaps Irish migrants have been more visible at a local level than on the wider national agenda.

38. Ryan, ‘Muslim Women’.

39. Glick Schiller and Caglar, ‘Towards a Comparative Theory of Locality’, 184.

40. Glick Schiller and Caglar, ‘Towards a Comparative Theory of Locality’, 184

41. Glick Schiller and Caglar, ‘Towards a Comparative Theory of Locality’, 184

42. Portes and Sensenbrenner, ‘Embeddedness and Immigration’, 1328.

43. Mahler and Pessar, ‘Gender Matters’, 38.

44. Nazroo and Karlsen, ‘Patterns of Identity among Ethnic Minority People’, 928.

45. D'Angelo and Ryan, ‘Sites of Socialisation’.

46. Mahler and Pessar, ‘Gender Matters’, 32.

47. Mahler and Pessar, ‘Gender Matters’, 32

48. Belchem and Tenfelde, Irish and Polish Migration, 11–25.

49. Boyd, ‘Family and Personal Networks in International Migration’.

50. Ryan, ‘How Women Use Family Networks’.

51. Belchem and Tenfelde, Irish and Polish Migration, 7.

52. Accession Monitoring Report .

53. Eade, Garapich, and Drinkwater, Class and Ethnicity.

54. Hillyard, Suspect Community.

55. Belchem and Tenfelde, Irish and Polish Migration.

56. Ryan, ‘How Women Use Family Networks’.

57. The Polish study was carried out by a team of researchers, which I led. One of the researchers was Polish and many of the interviews were carried out in Polish and later translated into English. I also conducted several interviews in English with migrants who had fluency in the language. It is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss issues around translation and understanding the subtlety of meaning across languages.

58. Ryan, ‘Social Networks, Social Support and Social Capital’.

59. Haug, ‘Migration Networks and Migration Decision Making’, 585.

60. O'Brien, ‘New Wine in Old Skins’.

61. Temple, ‘Representation across Languages’.

62. Donato et al., ‘A Glass Half Full?’

63. Ryan, ‘How Women Use Family Networks’.