359
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Science Denial, Cognitive Command, and the Theory-Ladenness of Observation: A Postscript for a Time of ‘Post-Truth’

Pages 198-210 | Received 02 Jan 2024, Accepted 03 Jan 2024, Published online: 22 Jan 2024
 

ABSTRACT

One worrying aspect of contemporary Western Society is the increasing prevalence of instances of ‘Science Denial’ in popular culture. Examples include both cases where well-attested scientific hypotheses are rejected and conversely, where scientifically discredited ideas are stubbornly retained. The paper raises the question whether the kind of argument for an anti-realist conception of empirical scientific theory considered in my contribution to the inaugural issue of this journal could in principle provide intellectual succour for these trends. The discussion proceeds through an examination of the role of ‘takings for granted’ in all reflective enquiry to the conclusion that a trusting acceptance of the general credibility of informants is a precondition for the exercise of individual epistemic responsibility, and that in that context an acceptance of at least the empirical adequacy, if not the truth, realistically understood, of the teachings of scientists in general is rationally non-optional.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1. Wright (Citation1993).

2. Wittgenstein (Citation1953) from the Preface at p. viii.

3. The locus classicus in Quine (Citation1975). For an excellent overview, see Kyle Stanford (Citation2023).

4. See also Haack (Citation2019), Hesse (Citation1986) (Hesse Citation1988), and (Hesse Citation1966).

5. It matters that we are here considering reflective enquiry, as opposed to what we might call, adapting terminology originated by Ernest Sosa (Citation2001), ‘animal enquiry’.

6. See for example Wright (Citation2024).

7. In his (McDowell Citation1983), for example, John McDowell proposes that we may sometimes ‘see another’s pain in [their] face’.

8. See chapter 3 of Wright (Citation1992)

9. For elaboration see Wright (Citation1993) at pp. 244–7.

10. I am grateful to the editors of the International Journal of Philosophical Studies for the opportunity to contribute to this special issue to celebrate the thirtieth anniversary of the inception of the journal.