866
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Ableism versus free speech in Australia: challenging online hate speech toward people with Down syndrome

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1711-1733 | Received 01 Dec 2020, Accepted 08 Feb 2022, Published online: 25 Feb 2022
 

Abstract

Negative, ableist discourse challenging the rights of people with Down syndrome to receive support services and even to be born regularly arise on social media. This disability community has retaliated against such hate speech with resistance narratives that promote the value of people with Down syndrome, with few other recourses available. This article explores online free speech versus ableism in Australia through a major case study of 60 Minutes Australia Facebook discussions. Analysis identifies types of ableism expressed, types of harm caused and dimensions of grassroots responses. Using Timothy Garton Ash’s Citation2016 work Free Speech as a basis for contemporary analysis, we discuss: to what extent should harmful and offensive comments directed at vulnerable populations be tolerated in the name of free speech; might negative, ableist discourse contribute to any social good; and what mechanisms beyond grassroots resistance narratives might effectively respond to harmful, online ableist discourses.

    Points of interest

  • The article looks at whether the right to free speech is more important than the harmful effects of online hate speech towards people with Down syndrome.

  • We use the ideas in a book on Free Speech by Timothy Garton Ash to think about whether online hate speech should be allowed or silenced.

  • Our analysis is based on a case study of Facebook discussion threads from a 60 Minutes Australia television segment.

  • People in the disability community speaking up to create resistance narratives is the main way that online disability hate speech is challenged.

  • Other ways that could help are laws, government agencies providing support materials, and social media rules.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they held no relevant financial or non-financial competing interests in producing this work.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.