Using virtual reality to implement disability studies’ advocacy principles: uncovering the perspectives of people with disability

Abstract

One central aim of disability studies is to shift understandings of disability, such that disability comes to be understood as about the social disadvantage/oppression that people face when society does not cater to impairment of body/mind. Nevertheless, there remains a need for more practical tools for disability advocacy, through which to transmit disability studies’ ideas of disability to the general community. Drawing on a qualitative study of the perspectives of 23 people with physical and sensory impairments, this paper proposes virtual reality as an advocacy tool to communicate the principles and beliefs of disability studies. The findings highlight that, due to the nature of the technology, participants feel virtual reality has clear potential as a disability advocacy tool that can facilitate empathy, perspective-taking and positive social change, with a particular focus on how it is the environmental barriers and social attitudes around people that disables them.

Points of interest

• More practical advocacy or informal education tools are needed that align with the principles of disability studies.

• This research conducted in-depth interviews with 23 people with physical and sensory impairments.

• The research finds that virtual reality has clear potential as a disability advocacy tool.

• The participants reported that virtual reality can facilitate empathy, perspective-taking and positive social change.

• The research finds that virtual reality focuses on how environmental barriers and social attitudes around people with disability disable them, rather than focusing on impairment experiences.

Keywords:

• Disability studies
• virtual reality/VR
• disability advocacy
• advocacy tools

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Correction Statement

This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Disability Innovation Institute and Health@Business seed funding, University of New South Wales.