983
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editor's Choice

Examining the blurred boundaries between medical and recreational cannabis – results from an international study of small-scale cannabis cultivators

, , , , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , & show all
Pages 250-258 | Received 07 Apr 2017, Accepted 24 Nov 2017, Published online: 18 Dec 2017
 

Abstract

Aim: To compare characteristics of recreational vs. medical growers in a sample of small-scale cannabis cultivators from 12 countries.

Methods: Six thousand eight hundred ninety six respondents who took part in an online survey were divided into three groups as: those who reported growing for recreational use, those cultivating for medical purposes who also reported use of other illegal drugs, and those who reported cultivation for medical use and didn’t use other illegal substances. The groups were compared using multinomial logistic regression.

Findings: In comparison to recreational growers, the two groups of medical growers included more females, consumed cannabis more frequently, and were more likely to cite health-related motivations for growing. The medical growers without other illicit drug use shared some of the same features with the medical growers with illicit drug use, but in comparison to both other groups, they were older, used less alcohol and tobacco, and were less likely to be involved in illicit activities other than drug crimes.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that claims of medical use are not simply an attempt to justify personal cannabis consumption, but do at least partly reflect a genuine belief in medical benefit. However, those growing cannabis for medical reasons form a heterogeneous group of people.

Acknowledgements

The collection of the Belgian data took place within the research project ‘Cannabis production in Belgium: assessment of the nature and harms, and implications for priority setting’ (CANMARKT; No DR/63).

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

The Belgian study was commissioned and funded by the Belgian Science Policy Department, in the framework of the ‘Research programme in support of the Federal Drugs Policy Document. Simon Lenton is supported by funding under the Drug and Alcohol Program from the Australian Government through its core funding of the National Drug Research Institute at Curtin University. Monica Barratt is supported by a fellowship from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC; APP1070140). The National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre and the National Drug Research Institute are supported by funding from the Australian Government under the Substance Misuse Prevention and Service Improvement Grants Fund.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.