Publication Cover
Angelaki
Journal of the Theoretical Humanities
Volume 15, 2010 - Issue 2
580
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A Timeless Sublime?

reading the feminine sublime in the discourse of the sacred

Pages 85-100 | Published online: 13 Oct 2010
 

Notes

notes

1 For elaboration of this process and clarification of terms see Kristeva, Powers of Horror, esp. chapters 1 and 2.

2 The modern subject, as I read it, does not have a categorical origin but is an entity that evolves, from around the time in which René Descartes was writing (the mid-sixteenth to early seventeenth century), up to and through the period de Bolla delimits (1756–63). More generally, though, the concept of a self (or ego) can be traced at least as far back as Saint Augustine, and is probably as transhistorical as (and a product of) Kristeva's abject.

3 Sublimation is nothing else than the possibility of naming the … pre-objectal … In the symptom, the abject permeates me, I become abject. Through sublimation I keep it under control. The abject is edged with the sublime. It is not the same moment on the journey, but the same subject and speech bring them into being. (Kristeva, Powers of Horror 11)

4 This idea relates to the logic of the parergon in Derrida's Truth in Painting.

5 Along with Hadewijch I am thinking, in particular, of Marguerite Porete (c.1250–1310), Mechthild of Magdeburg (1210–c.1285), and Angela of Foligno (c.1248–1309), which are each illustrative of a new mysticism that arose in the thirteenth century, which, through the process of self-sacrifice to/for an absolute Other (God), helped to forge new (especially female) subject positions. On this idea see McGinn 141–42, 199, 12.

6 On this point, along with Easthope's article, see Castle's The Female Thermometer.

7 Wolfreys, for instance, sees the spectral “at the heart of any narrative of the modern” (3).

8 See Lyotard, Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime 180; and Freeman 69–70.

9 See Janowitz 3; and Ashfield and de Bolla 233–43.

10 See Burke, Enquiry, in Ashfield and de Bolla 139.

11 On the “semiotic” modality of signifying practice see Kristeva, Revolution in Poetic Language, esp. chapter 1.

12 See Kristeva, Black Sun 97–103.

13 See my article “Coleridge's Translucence.” On the idea of the deject see Kristeva, Powers of Horror 8.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.