Use of different methods for the evaluation of teat disinfectant products

ABSTRACT

There are many test methods used to determine the effectiveness of teat disinfectants. The objective of this study was to determine the outcome from the use of three different test methods (BS EN 1656 [laboratory], disc diffusion [laboratory] and an experimental challenge teat swabbing method [in-field]) when evaluating the effectiveness of ten teat disinfectant products. Products were tested against three bacterial strains (Escherichia [E.] coli [ATCC^® 10536™], Staphylococcus [Staph.] aureus [ATCC^® 6538™] and Streptococcus [Str.] uberis [ATCC^® 19436™]). All products satisfied the requirements of the BS EN 1656 method achieving >10⁵ log reductions. Two laboratory methods were consistent in identifying effective products against Staph. aureus and E. coli, whereas, all three methods were consistent in identifying effective products against Str. uberis. Within the two laboratory methods, products containing 2% lactic acid combined with 0.3% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5% lactic acid combined with 0.3% chlorhexidine were within the top four most effective products against Staph. aureus. For Str. uberis, products containing 2.4% lactic acid, 0.29% iodine combined with 0.8% lactic acid and 0.5% iodine (control) were within the top four most effective products. This study has established that effectiveness of teat disinfectant products can be determined by different test methods.

KEYWORDS:

• Teat disinfectant
• disc diffusion
• BS EN 1656
• experimental challenge
• teat swab

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Dairy Research Levy Fund administered by Dairy Research Ireland. Sarah Fitzpatrick is in receipt of a Teagasc Walsh Fellowship (Ref. 2016054).