10,598
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Drought vulnerability and impacts of climate change on livestock production and productivity in different agro-Ecological zones of Ethiopia

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 471-489 | Received 22 Feb 2022, Accepted 14 Jul 2022, Published online: 01 Aug 2022

ABSTRACT

Drought is a complicated natural hazard that has far-reaching social and environmental impacts. In Ethiopia's diverse agro ecological zones, drought remains a severe challenge and problem. Livestock rising is one of the agricultural sub-sectors that provide income and livelihood to around one-third of African inhabitants and accounts for 30–50 percent of agricultural GDP. Pastoralists on the Ethiopia-Kenya-Somalia border endured extreme suffering, including the loss of nearly 80% of their cattle and huge migration out of drought-stricken areas. Drought can cause severe economic hardship and stress for farmers and local economies, like; lost productivity, population reduction, and the trauma of witnessing livestock, crops, soil, and native vegetation damage. Between 1990 and 2000, and 2001-2002/03, drought-related animal death rates in the Somali region increased by 60% and 80% of the entire cattle population, respectively. Drought has the greatest immediate effects on farmers, including depletion of water resources, crop failure, and an increase in food prices, ill health, livestock output losses and death, and a decline in livestock prices in the Borana zone. Drought adaptation and mitigation measures depending on geography and livestock system may improve the study's trajectory in the future if further review is done.

1. Introduction

The global climate change is therefore considered a key policy issue of policymakers in this century, as it affects social well-being, problems in economic development and improvements in the atmosphere (Mikayilov et al. Citation2018). Climate change has been triggered by carbon dioxide emission which poses unparalleled threats to human existence and growth, such as extreme weather, environmental invasion and scarcity of resources (Dong et al. Citation2019). Livestock has long been recognized as a particular problem due to climate change mitigation, reducing farm pollution, and building more productive food systems and security (Ripple et al. Citation2014; Vermeulen et al. Citation2012; Moore and Ghahramani Citation2013). Furthermore, livestock farming has also been alleged to further stimulate the emissions of GHG into the global atmosphere (Sakadevan and Nguyen Citation2017; Wei et al. Citation2018; Zhang et al. Citation2019).

Livestock products account for 17% of world calorie consumption and 33% of global protein consumption, making them an important agricultural commodity for global food security (Rosegrant et al. Citation2009). Furthermore, the livestock sector contributes to the livelihoods of one billion of the world's poorest people and employs nearly 1.1 billion people (Hurst et al. Citation2005). There is an increasing demand for livestock products, which has been dubbed the ‘livestock revolution’ because of its rapid rise in emerging countries (Thornton Citation2010; Wright et al. Citation2012). Climate change, competition for land and water, and food security are all expected to have a negative impact on livestock production at a time when it is most needed (Thornton Citation2010).

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which result in atmospheric warming, are the primary cause of global climate change (IPCC Citation2013b). According to Gerber et al. (Citation2013), the cattle sector generates 14.5 percent of global GHG emissions, which might lead to increased land degradation, air and water pollution, and biodiversity loss (Steinfeld et al., Citation2006; Reynolds et al. Citation2010; Thornton and Gerber Citation2015; Bellarby et al. Citation2013). Simultaneously, climate change will have an impact on livestock production due to competition for natural resources, feed quantity and quality, livestock illnesses, heat stress, and biodiversity loss, while demand for livestock products is anticipated to increase by 100% by the mid-twentieth century (Garnett Citation2009). As a result, maintaining a balance between productivity, family food security, and environmental preservation is a challenge (Wright et al. Citation2012).

Following that, the devastating effects of climate change have been noticed in diverse ways among the livelihood options of pastoral and agro-pastoral populations in East Africa for many years (Tsegaye et al. Citation2010). Although livestock and crop productivity are entirely dependent on land suitability, land degradation caused by human, drought, and climate factors is clearly visible in terms of loss of livelihood sources, biodiversity, and desertification expansion (Adger et al. Citation2000; Prince Citation2002; Stringer et al. Citation2009). These have impaired the adaptive capacity of pastoralists and agro-pastoralists, who are primarily concentrated in East Africa's dry-land regions (Sandford Citation2006). Moreover, traditional adaptation strategies such as livestock mobility, diversification, feed procurement, and animal restocking, particularly in Ethiopia, have proven ineffective in meeting their livelihood needs (Wassie and Fekadu Citation2014; Kima et al. Citation2015). This necessitates a thorough examination into how numerous coexisting elements influence pastoral and agro-pastoral communities’ adaptive capabilities across climatic zones (Adger et al., Citation2009).

In Eastern and Western Africa, climate extremes are having a substantial impact on livestock productivity. Droughts are becoming more frequent and intense, and changes in water availability, as well as increasing patterns of temperature and rainfall variability, are all endangering drought-prone communities’ livelihoods and the existence of arid and semi-arid isolated regions (Palombi and Sessa Citation2013; Ulrichs et al. Citation2019). Livestock raising is one of the agricultural sub-sectors that provides income and livelihood to around one-third of African inhabitants and accounts for 30–50 percent of agricultural GDP (AU-IBAR Citation2016). In most pastoral and agro-pastoral communities, livestock is the poor's most valuable asset, despite the sector's vulnerability to extreme weather (Fereja Citation2016).

Ethiopia is home to Africa’s largest livestock population, and it is the continent’s top livestock producer and exporter. The recent livestock population of Ethiopia estimates that the country has about 57.83 million cattle, 28.89 million sheep, 29.70 million goats, 2.08 million horses,7.88 million donkeys, 60.51 million poultry, 5.92 million beehive, 0.41 million mules and about 1.23 million camels (CSA Citation2016). The pastoral areas on the Ethiopia-KenyaSomalia border faced abject hardships, including loss of about 80 percent of their livestock and mass migration of pastoralists out of drought-affected areas (FAO Citation2011; Headey et al. Citation2012). During the rainy season, pastures are more plentiful and of greater nutritional quality, but during the dry season, pastures are of lower nutritional quality, with high fibre and low protein content, resulting in decreased animal productivity (Abebe Citation2017). Therefore, the overall objective of this review was to examine the current drought susceptibility and climate change implications on livestock output and productivity in Ethiopia's various agro-ecological zones.

2. Impacts of drought on agropastoralist production in Ethiopia

2.1 . Some concepts and definitions of key terms

Climate:- Climate refers to the average of meteorological parameters over a period of time, usually 30 years in a certain location. Climate measures primarily consist of estimates of average weather parameter values and measures of variability close to the average value. Most of the time, these important values are surface factors like temperature, precipitation, and wind. Climate patterns have a significant impact on natural ecosystems, human economy, and civilizations that rely on them. Climate change has an impact on a wide range of agricultural activities, outputs, and input resources such as yields, animal production, land quality, on-farm storage, water supplies, labour migration rates between urban and rural areas, population growth, farm revenue, and farmer skills (Washington and Dawning Citation1999).

Climate change:- Climate change is defined as a major and long-term (decades or more) shift in climatic conditions. It's a dramatic change in the atmosphere's mean state and event frequency. The impact of climate change on cattle diseases is determined by geographic region, land use type, disease characteristics, and animal susceptibility (Thornton et al. Citation2009). Climate change, particularly rising temperatures, can have a direct or indirect impact on animal health (Nardone et al. Citation2010). The direct impacts are linked to rising temperatures, which raise the risk of sickness and death.

Climate change manifestations such as rising temperatures, increased irregular rainfall, frequent and severe floods, and droughts have substantial effects for smallholder farming communities’ livelihood security, making them more vulnerable and difficult to live with. In many African countries, agriculture is critical to rural populations’ survival (Gizachew and Shimelis Citation2014).

Climate variability:- Beyond specific weather events, climate variability is defined as variations in the mean state and other statistics of the climate on all temporal and spatial scales. When compared against long-term statistics for the same calendar period, it is frequently used to denote variances in climatic statistics over a certain period of time (month, season, or year). The El-Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is an example of climate variability caused by interactions between the ocean and the atmosphere. In Ethiopia, there is a strong link between climate and agricultural production in terms of timing, variability, seasonal and annual rainfall, and temperature. Higher temperatures and shifting rainfall levels as a result of climate change, according to Mintewab et al. (Citation2010), would significantly reduce agricultural production in several dry and semi-arid portions of Ethiopia in the next decades.

Weather and Precipitation: Rainfall, snowfall, and other types of frozen or liquid water falling from clouds are referred to as precipitation. Precipitation forms when water vapour condenses, which normally happens in rising air that expands and cools. Weather refers to the day-to-day changes in the atmosphere, as well as the description of the atmospheric conditions at a specific point in time for a single event. The atmosphere, daily air temperature, pressure, humidity, wind speed, and precipitation are all described by weather, which is a short-term occurrence (IPCC Citation2008; WMO Citation2007).

Drought is one of the components of weather climate extremes, and it occurs when natural water supply is lower than normal, resulting in water-related difficulties. Streamflows plummet, water levels in lakes and reservoirs fall, and the depth to water in wells increases when rainfall is less than average for weeks to years. Drought is a complicated and recurring natural hazard that can have major negative consequences for agriculture, business, the environment, and people's lives (Gan et al. Citation2016; Cammalleri et al. Citation2017). Drought is predicted to become more common and severe in many parts of the world in the twenty-first century as a result of climate change (Spinoni et al. Citation2018a, Citation2018b; IPCC Citation2014). It is more necessary than ever to gain a better knowledge of the drought phenomena, particularly the physical mechanisms that contribute to drought, its propagation through the hydrological cycle, societal and environmental vulnerability to drought, and its wide-ranging repercussions. Drought is defined as a lack of precipitation induced by a variety of natural factors such as global climatic variability and high pressure, which results in reduced relative humidity and less precipitation.

Drought is unquestionably one of the most difficult and complex natural calamities to manage (Sivakumar Citation2014; Van and Anne Citation2015). It was a result of the climate, and it impacted many countries throughout the world, including Ethiopia and the Horn of Africa, as well as many other Sub-Saharan African countries (Gutierrez et al., Citation2014). Dracup et al. (Citation1980) found that droughts are caused by changes in precipitation (meteorological), stream flow (hydrological), soil moisture (agricultural), or any combination of these factors.

2.2. Drought types

Ethiopia's government has adopted a national drought strategy (FDRE Citation2015), which calls for local stakeholder-driven drought contingency planning to promote long-term water resource management (Megersa et al. Citation2014). Droughts can be grouped into four types, according to : meteorological, hydrological, agricultural, and socioeconomic (Heim Citation2002).

Figure 1. The occurrence of different types of droughts and their effects on the ecosystem.

Figure 1. The occurrence of different types of droughts and their effects on the ecosystem.

Meteorological droughts (MDs); are water shortages induced by a difference in precipitation and evaporation; precipitation is often employed in MD analyses (Chang Citation1991; Eltahir Citation1992). Droughts in the weather have the potential to affect agricultural productivity by reducing the availability of soil moisture (agricultural droughts).

Hydrological droughts (HDs) occur when surface and subsurface water resources are insufficient for established water uses in a specific water resource management system. Streamflow data is commonly used in HD analysis (Dracup et al. Citation1980; Chang Citation1991). Droughts are generally caused by a lack of moisture in the atmosphere (meteorological droughts). They spread via hydrologic systems, causing water supply shortages (hydrologic droughts). Droughts in agriculture and hydrology are influenced not just by rainfall, but also by other processes including plant water intake (evapotranspiration). Due to lesser humidity, rainfall deficiencies tend to result in warmer temperatures. Droughts have an impact on a variety of other hydrologic processes, including exfiltration and stream baseflow. To gain a better knowledge of droughts, it is vital to analyze droughts using several indicators calculated over different time periods (Karamouz et al. Citation2009; Ziese et al. Citation2014).

Agricultural droughts occur when crops are harmed, and this drought occurs more frequently than meteorological droughts, but the time interval between the two droughts is determined by the crop stage (Heim Citation2002). When the soil moisture availability to plants drops to the point that it significantly impacts crop yield and thus agricultural profitability, an agricultural drought is declared. In a nutshell, agricultural drought refers to soil moisture deficit as a result of meteorological droughts and climatic conditions, as well as the effects of these factors on agricultural production and profitability. The basis for evaluating agricultural drought factors is a soil water time series.

Socioeconomic drought; because local reservoirs play a vital role in enhancing water supply and coping with extreme climate, it is reasonable to assess socioeconomic drought based on reservoir activities. Droughts can also have serious consequences for rural regions’ socio-economic well-being (socio-economic droughts) (Linke et al. Citation2015). Drought can have a significant economic impact on farmers and the local economy (Diersen et al. Citation2002, Horridge et al. Citation2005, Edwards et al. Citation2009). The broader societal repercussions of drought, on the other hand, have gotten far less attention (Fritze et al. Citation2008). Drought has a number of social effects, including indirect effects of economic factors such as the hardship and stress of lost productivity; population decline; social disruption as a result of the negative economic effects of drought; and the trauma of witnessing damage to livestock, crops, soil, and native vegetation (Berry et al. Citation2008).

2.3. Drought's causes, effects, and consequences

Drought has impacted nearly every sector in Ethiopia in the past, including agriculture (loss of crops and livestock), water resources (increased evaporation and decreased availability of fresh water, resulting in water stress), insufficient water for industry, reduced electricity production (from hydropower), and so on. The impact on ecosystems is enormous, despite the fact that it has not been fully examined and documented (loss of wet lands and lakes, loss of forest and soil cover, increased soil erosion and land degradation, etc.). Increased human and livestock diseases, migration, and water disputes, as well as a drop in the national gross domestic product (GDP) are all significant social and economic consequences. Perhaps nowhere is the impact of changing weather (drought) and climate regimes more visible than in the water sector (Kundzewicz et al., 2007 in Gutierrez et al., Citation2014), which has a substantial impact on all other sectors as a result of the meteorological drought (Van Dijk et al. Citation2013).

2.3.1. Crop and livestock damage

Farmers’ perceptions of drought in Ethiopia are based on the failure of seasonal rainfall (June to September) and, as a result, crop and livestock losses (elsewhere it is recognized as agricultural drought). The livestock sector is one of Tanzania's most important economic sectors that would be badly damaged by climate change if no major measures are done to mitigate its negative effects (MLDF Citation2015). Seasonal rainfall failure (meteorological drought) is mostly caused by climate variability, and its consequences include widespread failure of seasonal crops, pasture, and forage, as well as significant livestock deaths in pastoralist areas, as well as widespread starvation among the affected population. A population of roughly 10 million people (10%) became hungry as a result of the 2015 drought (estimate based on the number of people requiring food aid). In Ethiopia, the impact on agriculture always results in significant human and cattle loss. Changes in rainfall patterns and rising temperatures are predicted to have severe negative implications on the environment and water resources, crops and livestock, human health, and other rural livelihoods in Ethiopia, according to vulnerability evaluations (Deressa Citation2006).

2.3.2. Impact on the environment and water resources

Ethiopia is largely rural, with a huge population dependent on agriculture and pastoral activities, although surface water and groundwater supplies for irrigation have been underdeveloped (Ewonetu Citation2012). Dryland farming is common in Ethiopia, accounting for more than two-thirds of the country's total agricultural land (MoA Citation2011). Ethiopia has been plagued by droughts on a regular basis, and they are a major climatic danger that threatens the country's long-term viability (Meze-Hausken Citation2004; Mersha and van Laerhoven Citation2018). Water supplies in both man-made and natural water bodies are rapidly dwindling, affecting the availability of water for irrigation and electricity generation, as well as the economy. When groundwater is polluted with toxic chemical compounds through human activities it can become unsuitable for several years (Akhila et al. Citation2007). The residence time of chemical pollutants can be retained in the groundwater system for weeks to months, years, and decades (Singh et al. Citation2019).

Hydrological drought (Van and Anne Citation2015) is a term used to describe a decrease in lake levels, low river/stream flows, and a decrease in ground water levels. The degradation of water resources is a much-studied phenomenon and can be caused by natural processes (climate change, water-rock interactions, and geological factors) and human activity (agriculture practices and urban waste), as well as the presence of considerable chemical compounds since the industrial revolution (Nagaraju et al. Citation2016). In addition, the physicochemical and biological characteristics, as well as quality, quantity and availability of water resources, fluctuate because of the impact of natural and human activities (Akhtar et al. Citation2021). The pollutant types, pathways, and sources, as well as how they influence the surface water and groundwater systems based on natural sources and anthropogenic activities, are shown in .

Figure 2. Schematic diagram illustrates water contamination due to natural sources (droughts and floods) and anthropogenic sources (industrial, agriculture, and urban activities), their pathways, receptors, and other types of pollution (Sasakova et al. Citation2018)

Figure 2. Schematic diagram illustrates water contamination due to natural sources (droughts and floods) and anthropogenic sources (industrial, agriculture, and urban activities), their pathways, receptors, and other types of pollution (Sasakova et al. Citation2018)

2.3.3. Socio economic impact

In particular Ethiopian hotspot locations, there is a substantial drought potential analysis and assessment of social, economic, and environmental repercussions (Mesfin Citation1984; Pankhurst Citation1986; Degene Citation1990). Four severe droughts were identified as a result of the study: I the devastation of oXen by render pest in 1888–1892, (ii) the Tigray famine of 1958, which killed over 100,000 people, (iii) the Wag Lasta famine of 1966, and (iv) the Wollo Famine of 1973–74. Over the years, these droughts impacted a vast number of people. Between 1972 and 2002/3, the number increased dramatically, from 2 million to 14 million, with significant increases in 1976-1977, 1982–1984, and 1991–2002.

As seen in , drought affected over 10 million people (10%) in 2016, making it the worst drought in the preceding fifty years (USGS Citation2016). The amount of persons in need of food assistance varied by region; the Tigray, Afar, and Somali regions were particularly heavily struck, with 24, 25, and 21 percent of the population affected, respectively. Oromya required the most food aid, followed by Amhara and Tigray. More areas in the Afar and Somali regions were affected in terms of large geographic coverage. The drought, which devastated about half of the animals in the region, had a greater impact on children, particularly in pastoralist areas.

Table 1. Number of people receiving food aid (FORTUNE, 2016)

2.4. The impact of climate change on Ethiopian livestock production

Ethiopia is situated between 30 and 150 degrees north latitude and 330 and 480 degrees east latitude (). The climate in Ethiopia is typically tropical in the southeastern and northeastern lowlands, but significantly cooler in the country's vast central highlands. In high altitude locations, mean annual temperatures are around 15°C, whereas in the lowlands, they are around 25°C (McSweeney et al. Citation2007). Furthermore, the mean annual rainfall distribution contains maxima (>2000 mm) in the southwest and minima (300 mm) in the south northeast lowlands (Ofgeha and Abshire Citation2021). By 2050, global annual average temperature is expected to be 2°C higher than pre-industrial levels (IPCC Citation2007). Droughts, floods, heat waves, and other extreme weather phenomena will become more common and intense as the planet warms by 2 degrees Celsius. As a result of global warming, climate model projections suggest a large increase in mean temperatures in Ethiopia over the next century, as well as a rise in rainfall variability and the frequency of both major flooding and droughts (Robinson et al. Citation2013). Although the direct effects of heat stress on livestock have not been studied extensively, warming is expected to alter the feed intake, mortality, growth, reproduction, maintenance, and production of animals. Collectively, these effects are expected to have a negative impact on livestock productivity (Thornton et al. Citation2009).

Figure 3. Geographical location of Ethiopia which are highly affected by drought force

Figure 3. Geographical location of Ethiopia which are highly affected by drought force

2.4.1. Resources for livestock

The production of beef cattle, dairy cattle, goats, sheep, and chickens contributes for around 30% of the total value of agricultural production in Africa, with 92 percent of that coming from beef cattle, dairy cattle, goats, sheep, and chickens (IFAD Citation2009; IUCN Citation2010). The growth of the human population, rising living standards (increased demand for animal products as earnings rise), and urbanization are all driving up livestock output in Africa (Philip et al. Citation2007; IUCN Citation2010). Ethiopia is Africa's greatest livestock producer and exporter, with the continent's highest cattle population. Although domestic demand for animal products is growing in Ethiopia, driven by the urban middle and upper classes, export potential is the driving factor behind livestock expansion and intensification (MacDonald and Simon Citation2011). The cattle industry is an important aspect of the country's farming systems. In both the highlands and lowlands/pastoral farming systems, it is the source of numerous social and economic goods such as food, draught power, fuel, monetary income, security, and investment (FDRE Citation2001). Ethiopia has roughly 52.1 million cattle, 24.2 million sheep, 22.6 million goats, and 44.9 million fowl, according to a recent livestock population estimate (FDRE Citation2001; Berihu et al. Citation2014).

2.4.2. Climate change's impact on cattle production

Climate change and cattle are inextricably linked (Iqubal Citation2013). The pattern and availability of rainfall have a huge impact on the spatial distribution and availability of pasture and water (Aklilu et al. Citation2013). Changes in rainfall patterns and temperature ranges also have an impact on feed availability, grazing ranges, feed quality, weed, pest, and disease incidence (Coffey Citation2008). As a result, environmental parameters like temperature, precipitation, and the frequency and intensity of extreme occurrences like droughts had a direct impact on cattle output (Adams et al. Citation1998). Climate change affects animal productivity in two ways, according to Coffey (Citation2008). Similarly, Adams et al. (Citation1998) found that climate change can influence livestock in two ways: the quality and quantity of fodder from grasslands may be changed, and greater temperatures may have direct consequences on livestock. Climate change is projected to have the greatest impact on vulnerable pastoral communities who rely on huge livestock production systems in arid environments (Saidu and Omedo Citation2010).

2.4.3. Indigenous mechanisms of weather forecasting

Pastoralists have long relied on traditional methods to predict seasonal climate occurrences. Reading of animal behaviours and body conditions is indigenously believed among the Borena that specific body conditions and behaviours of animals during resource abundant time give clues about the future weather. To the contrary, the following cattle body conditions and behaviours are regarded as signs of a normal rainy season. They lick each other’s body, wander around villages in search of bone to eat, they display a relaxed mood and get away from water points after drinking. They show normal sexual desire and the bull visits many cows within a short period of time. A study report in Kenya reveals that some of these body conditions are interpreted similarly but disagrees that cattle fight over food in view of a future of drought (Speranza et al. Citation2010). The knowledge of such elders is still highly valued in Ethiopian pastoralist communities (Gebremichael and Kifle Citation2009). Traditional methods of predicting climate events, on the other hand, are seen as becoming less reliable as climate variability increases. This ‘raises the question of whether external, meteorology-based climate forecasts could better assist pastoralists in conserving cattle wealth and contributing to the sustainable use of natural resources (Luseno et al. Citation2003).’

The primary warning is critical for early animal sales to avoid livestock losses, grain purchases before price increases, and alternative options research before households are hit by food shortages (Gebremichael and Kifle Citation2009). On the other side, wealth in pastoralist societies is seen to be influenced by the amount of cattle held, and livestock sales are thought to lower household wealth. As a result, selling livestock ahead to a projected drought is not a popular practice among Ethiopian pastoralists. According to a research by Pantuliano and Mike (Citation2008), efficient EWS allows for early detection of food insecurity during drought.

2.5. Drought management for livestock

Many people working on drought relief in pastoral areas of East and Central Africa agree on the importance of timely and suitable interventions to save cattle during droughts (ECA). Pastoralists use a variety of coping and adaptation tactics to protect livestock assets during droughts, including transferring animals to places with better fodder and water, selling some animals, separating or trading herds, and changing the species makeup of herds over time (Morton et al. Citation2001). Pastoralists’ animals are a valuable asset, and livestock losses due to drought have a detrimental influence on pastoral livelihood strategies by reducing milk production, reducing revenue from livestock sales, and reducing the asset value of cattle that die. Furthermore, during the current drought in Kenya in 2008-9, certain districts reported fatality rates of above 50% (Zwaagstra et al. Citation2010). As a result, various academics pushed for the establishment of Drought Cycle Management (DCM) and the more modern Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) principles (IIRR Citation2004; ISDR Citation2009). Drought is a threat that is constantly present in the dry plains of East and Central Africa, according to these two frameworks (ECA).

2.6. Drought impacts and adaptation strategies in Borana zone, southern Ethiopia

Ethiopia is frequently mentioned as a prospective cattle resource country (Shapiro et al. Citation2015). This resource is an important aspect of the agricultural system and a source of income for a large number of rural and semi-urban residents. However, as drought length, intensity, and coverage have increased in tandem with irregular, highly intensive, and short-duration rainfall, traditional coping techniques have become increasingly constrained (Skinner Citation2010). Every few years, it's heartbreaking to witness the same tragedy: a weather cycle that brings terrible drought and hunger to east Africa, putting millions of people's lives and livelihoods at jeopardy. The weather cycle that is causing these incidents is a ‘La Niña’. that has been exacerbated by climate change. ‘La Niña’ is caused by a drop in ocean temperatures in the eastern Pacific, resulting in dry spells across eastern Africa. The ocean has absorbed about 30% of the CO2 released from human activities, causing a measurable increase in the acidity of the oceans. Warming caused by humans in the western Pacific Ocean is exacerbating the problem. The impacts may be severe, and tropical countries in particular face temperature increases, changes in precipitation patterns, increased heavy rainfall from tropical cyclones and sea-level rise, which may have catastrophic impacts for low-lying Pacific nations (IPCC Citation2014). The fast warming of the west Pacific as a result of global emissions has resulted in greater rain around Indonesia and worrying but expected rainfall shortfalls in desert, food-insecure eastern Kenya, Somalia, and Ethiopia ().

Figure 4. The severity of the drought affecting the livestock of Borana zone in October 2022

Figure 4. The severity of the drought affecting the livestock of Borana zone in October 2022

Drought is a typical occurrence throughout the Borana zone's lowlands, however its impact varies by region. However, the focus of this research was on the 13 districts in the Borana zone that were severely damaged. As a result, the Yabello and Dirre districts of Borana zone were specifically chosen based on the severity of drought effects reported by Borana zone ().

Figure 5. Borana zone is located in Ethiopia's southern region

Figure 5. Borana zone is located in Ethiopia's southern region

2.6.1. Drought's effects on cattle production

Droughts, combined with cattle recovery times, have had a significant impact on livestock size and composition. Cattle, in particular, are the most vulnerable livestock species in the Borana zone. According to the findings, around 68 percent of the livestock killed throughout the study were cattle. On the other hand, within a decade, the maximum size of animals in the research area was lowered by 315 percent (). As a result, the number of households without animals is growing, forcing them to look for alternate sources of income, mainly crop cultivation. Droughts can last for several years, but even a brief, severe drought can cause significant animal feed degradation (IVM Citation2009).

Figure 6. The status of livestock composition in a decade

Figure 6. The status of livestock composition in a decade

In contrast, despite the continuous destruction effect of drought, the proportion of goats to other livestock was increasing. It is undeniable that goat populations are on the rise as a result of their high reproduction frequency, drought resistance, low feeding costs, low purchasing costs, and easy management, particularly during feed shortages. Drought can strike anywhere on the planet, but the consequences are less severe in Africa, notably in Ethiopia, due to a lack of adaptive capacity. Droughts have caused massive loss of life and property in the past, as well as mass displacement of people (NAPA Citation2007). Similarly, as shown in , the investigation revealed that even the maximum size of cattle is decreasing with time over a decade.

2.6.2. Effect of climate change on livestock production in Borana zone

Drought-related livestock losses are particularly significant among certain species, ages, and sex groups of livestock (Desta and Coppock Citation2004). Pastoralists in the Borana area said climate change had an impact on their livelihoods through a variety of ways (). The four principal effects of climate change on livestock production, as highlighted by pastoralists during the group discussion, are feed shortage, water shortage, reduced productivity, and decreased mature weight and/or longer time to achieve mature weight, in that order.

Table 2. Major effects of climate on livestock production ranked by pastoralists (Yilma et al. Citation2009)

Pastoralists in Ethiopia, in general, and in the Borana plateau in particular, have the highest rate of poverty and the least access to basic amenities when compared to other groups, and they are also among the most vulnerable to climate change (Oxfam Citation2008). Cattle, in general, are the most affected livestock type during severe droughts because they require more input than other livestock species. Due to their drought tolerance, prolific nature, and adaptation of their physiological make-up, small ruminant m ortality rates were lower than cattle. According to field statistics, shoats accounted for just about 11% of total livestock deaths during the field study. Furthermore, camels had the lowest death rate, at only 2%, demonstrating their higher tolerance. From highest to lowest, the major vulnerability rank can be associated with cattle, sheep, goat, and camel, as shown in . Camel is the least drought-prone livestock due to its ability to adapt to extreme conditions.

Table 3. During the recent drought season, livestock died

2.6.3. Drought-relief tactics

Coping techniques refer to strategies that have evolved over time as a result of people's extensive experience dealing with the known and understood natural fluctuation that they expect in seasons, as well as their unique responses to the season as it unfolds (Cooper et al. Citation2008). Through their experience, pastoralists in southern Ethiopia have devised numerous alternative coping techniques to combat the suffering effect of drought. However, the increased frequency of droughts threatens to overwhelm the pastoralists’ coping methods and resilience (Stark and Ejigu Citation2011). Weather, livestock, rangeland, and water-related techniques are presented in the following part to help with the discussion of coping strategies depending on diverse natural and environmental variables.

2.6.4. Adaptive strategies for livestock and water

Reduced livestock size, livestock movement, livestock and livelihood diversification are all examples of livestock-related coping methods. Approximately 33% of respondent homes used this method during the survey. Despite the fact that livestock remains the most important component of Borana livelihood, the poll found that pastoralists want to reduce their livestock size and even diversify to drought-resistant cattle kinds. Herd mobility is one of the long-standing livestock-related coping methods, which is influenced by the season and feed availability, as well as personal relationships, family structure, and immediate needs for water and pasture. Furthermore, drought is a big contributing element that affects cattle, since some herders will sell their livestock during a drought, disease can alter market pricing, and if food aid is made available, grain prices may be distorted (Morton et al. Citation2001).

Furthermore, a water resource is a critical resource that is impacted by severe drought and can be used to construct a water harvesting plan, such as a deep well or shallow pond, to collect rainwater for human and livestock consumption. Drought's qualities, as well as its wide-ranging consequences, make its effects on society, the economy, and the environment difficult to detect and quantify (Wilhite et al. Citation2000). However, in comparison to ten years ago, the average distance to the water has decreased for both animals and humans due to aggressive water development to address severe water shortages. Increasing frequency and intensity of droughts; changes in water availability; increasing patterns of temperature and rainfall variability, all are profoundly threatening livelihoods of drought-prone areas, and the existence of arid and semi-arid remote regions (Palombi and Sessa Citation2013; Ulrichs et al. Citation2019). To address water-related issues, a coordinated effort is needed to develop adequate potable water or a water healing, restorative, or recovery system. ().

Figure 7. Severe drought, water development and consumption

Figure 7. Severe drought, water development and consumption

2.7. Gender participation in drought pastoralist surviving mechanisms in Ethiopia's eastern region

Pastoral areas of Ethiopia, which are defined as arid and semi-arid rangelands, cover more than 62 percent of the country's land mass and keep over eleven million heads of livestock (Kassahun et al. Citation2008). Pastoralism employs roughly 27 percent of the entire national population, contributes about 30 percent of the gross national product, and generates 90 percent of the hard cash from live animal exports, according to Kassahun et al. (Citation2008). As seen in , Ethiopia's Somali and Hararghe, Fentale (kereyu Oromo), and Afar Regional States are primary pastoral habitats, with pastoralism also being practiced to a lesser level in other parts of the nation (World Bank Citation2002; Mulu Citation2010).

Figure 8. Drought has caused animal mortality in Ethiopia's eastern region

Figure 8. Drought has caused animal mortality in Ethiopia's eastern region

Pastoralist drought response mechanisms are marginalized by increasing land degradation, conflicts over scarce resources, limited access to information, limited education, skills, and access to financial services, markets required to diversify livelihoods, inadequate government policies, and population pressures, according to Riché et al. (Citation2009) and Kassa et al. (Citation2005). These are similar in the Shinile District of Somali pastoralist region, the research area, which is one of the poorest districts in Somali pastoralist region, characterized by low household livestock ownership compared to other Somali pastoralist districts (Devereux Citation2006; Mulu Citation2010). The climate in Shinile district is described as harsh, with frequent and severe droughts. This district is particularly vulnerable to drought due to its reliance on only one big rainy season and the extended intervals between rains.

2.6. Drought in Ethiopia and its effects on pastoralist communities

Drought is considered a common part of life in Ethiopia's dry and semi-arid regions, where rainfall is low during rainy seasons and unusually low every few years. For example, there were 15 droughts in these locations between 1978 and 1998 (Brown and Teshome Citation2007). Pastoralists’ livelihoods have to be carefully adjusted to low and fluctuating rainfall conditions (Devereux Citation2006). Drought-related animal mortality rates in the Somali region increased by roughly 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% of the total cattle population between 1930 and 1970, 1970-1990,1990-2000, and 2001-2002/03, respectively (SERP Citation1990). The problem is particularly acute in the country's dry and semi-arid regions, which are primarily pastoral and agro-pastoral (Gebremichael and Kifle Citation2009). Historically, pastoralists faced drought every 5–10 years (Lautze et al. Citation2003), but drought has been occuring every 1–2 years in recent years.

Furthermore, drought has been occuring every 1–2 years among the pastoral population of Borana, although it used to occur every 6–8 years, as evidenced by the two significant droughts that affected the zone in 2006 and 2008 (Riché et al. Citation2009). Furthermore, between 2007 and 2009, the two Somali districts of Ayisha and Erer had only 15 and 4 days of rain, respectively. The worst years in terms of drought between these periods were 2007 and 2008, which resulted in the death of a considerable number of animals (80 percent of cattle, 70 percent of sheep, 40 percent of camels and 30 percent of goats). Similarly, pastoralists in the Afar region have been experiencing catastrophic droughts every 2–3 years since 1993 (DPPC Citation2002). More than 80% of the total livestock deaths in Ethiopia's pastoral areas are due to drought (Kassahun Citation2003). The effects of losing these animals vary depending on the type of family and gender. Women-headed poorer homes with less cattle and poorer households, for example, are more sensitive to drought than others (Regassa et al. Citation2010).

2.9. Supporting livelihoods and appropriate funding to build resilience

The Damte family lives in Magado, Ethiopia's Borana zone (). The family's 30 cattle, 25 sheep and goats had provided a steady supply of milk and meat prior to the drought. They also provided milk, skins, meat, and calves to the local market for sale (Saving Lives through Livelihoods Citation2006). Animals contributes for more than 90% of the local economy in the Borana zone, and the sale of livestock and livestock products generates more than 60% of household income. Due to the drought, the Damtes were left with only two frail cows and one goat.

Figure 9. In Ethiopia's Magado Borana Zone, the Damte family is an example of drought

Figure 9. In Ethiopia's Magado Borana Zone, the Damte family is an example of drought

Drought can have severe repercussions on the lives and livelihoods of millions of pastoralists in the Horn of Africa, as the Damte family's story illustrates. Livelihoods interventions, such as livestock-related efforts (destocking) and water-related interventions such as the construction and rehabilitation of wells and boreholes, help pastoralists save lives while also increasing their resilience. Strategic livelihoods initiatives in pastoral communities have long been recognized for their socioeconomic significance (Aklilu and Wekesa Citation2002).

For example, a study of a destocking intervention in Ethiopia's Moyale Woreda during the 2006 drought found a benefit–cost ratio of about 41:1 in terms of aid funding. Destocking provided more than half – 52.4 percent – of the money for the programme's households, which was used to buy food and care for cattle. , designed to cover a variety of household needs, help relatives, and either pay off debts or put money into savings, allowing households to weather the drought without losing all of their assets (Demeke Citation2006).

Figure 10. Funding appeals and contributions (Saving Lives through Livelihoods: Critical Gaps in the Response to the Drought in the Greater Horn of Africa, HPG Briefing Note, 2006)

Figure 10. Funding appeals and contributions (Saving Lives through Livelihoods: Critical Gaps in the Response to the Drought in the Greater Horn of Africa, HPG Briefing Note, 2006)

2.10. Drought effects and traditional drought mitigation strategies

Droughts on the Borana production system in southern Ethiopia occurred in 1983–84 as a result of rainfall shortfalls over four consecutive rainy seasons spanning two years. Drought conditions are caused by a lack of adequate feed supplies, resulting in poor physical condition, which weakens the immune system and makes the animal more susceptible to disease. Drought, insufficient water, heat, and insufficient feed resources are the principal climate stresses in dryland environments, lowering livestock immunity and exposing animals to new diseases and vectors. The current study's findings echoed those of (Boru et al. Citation2014), who claimed that drought and land fragmentation contributed to animal deaths and a decline in the cattle population in the eastern Guji zone. Ethiopia has Africa's largest livestock population and is the tenth largest producer of livestock and livestock products in the world (MacDonald and Simon Citation2011). Livestock and livestock products account for around 10% of Ethiopia's foreign currency revenues (Pantuliano and Wekesa Citation2008). Respondents declared that the main drivers for livestock decline in the study area is drought and drought-driven impacts ().

Table 4. Drivers for livestock decline in the study area (Matiwos et al. Citation2022)

2.10.1. Mitigation of livestock-related risks

Cattle provide the majority of the diet and livelihood in Ethiopia's Borana zone (). If animal sources continue to provide the great majority of their calories, maintaining a sufficiently big herd size will be critical to guaranteeing adequate caloric intakes among the Borana. Although there is a move to non-traditional pastoralist livelihoods, livestock remains the most important component of Borana livelihoods (Wassie et al. Citation2007). Although huge herds may signify economic and food security, animal well-being and herd mortality are also linked to cattle herd size. shows how bigger herd sizes can increase herd mortality, especially under drought and stress situations (Lybbert et al. Citation2004). Milk output has declined, according to elders, because to diminishing rangeland quality and quantity. In the current drought, the number of breastfeeding animals required to maintain a household could be as high as 10-20, compared to just one or two lactation animals forty years ago.

Figure 11. During the current drought, livestock deaths are on the rise

Figure 11. During the current drought, livestock deaths are on the rise

2.10.2. Mobility of the herd

The Borana wander with their livestock in search of water and pasture as nomadic pastoralists. Season and forage availability, as well as personal relationships, family structure, and current demands, all influence movement. Drought is the natural danger that affects the greatest number of people worldwide, wreaking havoc. Drought has the most direct effects on farmers, including the drying up of water resources, crop failure, a rise in food prices, ill health, livestock output losses and death, and a drop in livestock prices (Udmale et al. Citation2014). As climate change has worsened, the Borana have changed their migration patterns, including when, where, and for how long they travel. According to Dr. Roobaa Basaayyee, the chairman of the Borana Zone Livestock Development and Health Agency, cattle going from the south, where tsetse flies are scarce, to the north, where they are plentiful, could catch trypanosomiasis, resulting in large livestock deaths (Yabello, July 2011).

2.11. Drought and climate-related hazards have an impact on livestock production in Ethiopia's Afar and Tigray regions

2.11.1. The effects of emergency livestock feeding on livestock mortality in the Afar area

FARM Africa, Save the Children-UK (SCUK), and CARE Ethiopia examined the impact of an emergency livestock feed supplementation programme in the Afar Region's Amibara, Teru, and Abala districts ().

Figure 12. Drought-affected pastoral and agro-pastoral areas in Afar districts on a map

Figure 12. Drought-affected pastoral and agro-pastoral areas in Afar districts on a map

The evaluated feed supplementation programme was created in response to the poor performance of both the Sugum (short rains in March-April) and Kerma (long rains in July-September) rains in 2009. Drought is a severe and recurring climate occurrence that affects the lives of millions of people around the world, and it is considered the most serious natural disaster in terms of economic, social, and environmental consequences (Mniki Citation2009). This revealed a severe lack of pasture and water in many parts of the region, as well as low trading terms. It also revealed that pasture and water constraints have caused lactating for cows to dry up and browsers (goats and camels) to produce far less, putting the nutritional status of households, particularly offspring and pregnant or lactating mothers, at risk. and indicate the impact of this livestock feeding intervention on cow and small ruminant mortality.

Table 5. Drought-related mortality in Teru and Abala study herds was compared

Table 6. Statistical analysis of mortality

2.12.2. Farmers’ perceptions of drought and its socioeconomic consequences in Ethiopia's Tigray and Afar regions

Climate change is real, and it is already happening. It will worsen in the future, with more negative consequences for rural poor communities in developing countries. Climate change and catastrophic weather events have gotten a lot of press in recent years (IPCC Citation2007). Furthermore, a recent IPCC assessment (IPCC Citation2013a) stated that the climate system is clearly warming, and that many of the changes seen since the 1950s are unprecedented for periods ranging from decades to millennia. Data on the economic effects of drought is few, incomplete, unreliable, and dispersed. Addressing these issues could be critical in decreasing the socioeconomic effects of drought, especially in Africa's least developed countries (Brida et al. Citation2013; Debela et al. Citation2015).

From March to June 2016, a cross-sectional examination of the study was undertaken in three Tigray districts (Alamata, Ofla, and Raya-azebo) and one Afar district (Aba'ala) (). Drought-prone and desert regions include Tigray, which is located in Ethiopia's northern and hilly highlands, and Afar, which is located in Ethiopia's northeastern region. The study districts were chosen for comparison of drought consequences in mid, highland, and lowland areas based on their previous histories. Alamata, Ofla, and Raya-azebo districts had populations of 85,403, 126,889, and 135,870, respectively, according to the 2007 national population and housing census (CSA Citation2007).

Figure 13. Tigray region in northern part Ethiopia's is located in a drought-prone environment

Figure 13. Tigray region in northern part Ethiopia's is located in a drought-prone environment

Farmers’ perceptions of drought and its effects found that 96.2 percent believe drought is a natural disaster rather than a man-made calamity. Furthermore, 77.5 percent of respondents have experienced drought, with 78.8, 17.5 percent, and 15% having experienced drought in 1983, 1989, and 2003, respectively, in addition to the current drought (2015/2016). In addition to the above drought years, the respondents mentioned other drought years they had lived through. Droughts were reported to occur more frequently than expected by 67.5 percent of research participants, while 56.25 percent of respondents predicted the commencement of drought. Droughts have substantial economic consequences because they disrupt populations’ main economic activity (Antonio et al. Citation2013).

2.13. Effects of climate change on Ethiopian agriculture, livestock, and the economy

The global economy and social progress are both threatened by climate change. Because their economies are primarily dependent on climate-sensitive activities like rain-fed agriculture, its effects would be disproportionately felt in Sub-Saharan African countries like Ethiopia. Agriculture accounts for over 47% of Ethiopia's GDP, and more than 70 million people (85% of the country's population) rely on it directly or indirectly for their livelihoods (MoFED Citation2013). As a result, any impact on Ethiopia's agricultural will have a huge impact on the country's economy. Climate change is expected to cause periodic droughts and excessive rainfall in various parts of Ethiopia, limiting the amount of land available for agriculture and lowering crop output.

2.14. Policy implications of the drought resistance mechanism in livestock production

Drought policies based on the principle of risk reduction can change a country's approach to drought management by lowering the negative consequences (risk). To address this problem, crops and livestock must be grown in livestock systems that require less water or in areas where water is abundant (Nardone et al. Citation2010). Furthermore, mitigation strategies such as increasing nitrogen use efficiency, plant breeding and genetic modifications using organic fertilizers regular soil testing, using technologically advanced fertilizers, and combining legumes and grasses in pasture areas may help to reduce GHG emissions in feed production (Denef et al. Citation2011, Citation2014). The national climate change strategy is broken down into three sub-documents (sub-strategies), each of which corresponds to one of the three pillars of climate policy: a national decarbonization roadmap for mitigation, a national adaptation strategy for adaptation, and a climate change partnership plan for raising awareness.

3. Conclusion and recommendation

Drought has wreaked havoc on Ethiopia's pastoral and agro-pastoral communities’ cattle, water, and grazing lands, as well as the pastoral and agro-pastoral communities’ socioeconomics. Drought continues to be a serious challenge and problem in several agro-ecological zones, particularly in Ethiopia's southern, eastern, and northern regions, where cattle is dominating due to an abundance of range land. Climate change, competition for natural resources, feed quality and quantity, livestock illnesses, heat stress, and biodiversity loss all have a negative impact on livestock output. Traditional adaptation measures in Ethiopia, such as livestock movement, diversification, feed procurement, and animal restocking, have been insufficient to meet their livelihood needs. Drought can occur in practically all climatic zones and is caused by a lack of precipitation over a lengthy period of time, usually a season or the long-term average condition in a specific area. Ethiopia is Africa's greatest livestock producer and exporter, with the continent's highest cattle population.

Climate change has a direct impact on cattle; the spatial distribution and availability of pasture and water are highly dependent on rainfall patterns and availability. Changes in rainfall patterns and temperature ranges also have an impact on feed availability, grazing ranges, feed quality, weed, pest, and disease incidence. Climate change can influence livestock in two ways: the quality and quantity of feed from grasslands may be affected, as well as direct consequences on animals owing to rising temperatures. Yabello and Dirre districts in Borana zone were chosen since drought severity harmed animals owing to a lack of quality and quantity water and feed. In the Borana zone of southern Ethiopia, almost 65 percent of cattle died, making them the most vulnerable animal kind. Pastoralism employs roughly 27% of Ethiopia's entire population, generates 30% of the country's gross domestic product, and generates 90% of the country's hard cash from live animal exports. Drought-related animal death rates in Somalia increased by a factor of 20, 40, 60, and 80 percent of the total cattle population from 1930 to 1970, 1970–1990, 1990–2000, and 2001–2002/03. In terms of livestock management, a quick response to the first failure of the long rains in April 1983 was to adjust cattle allocation from a 71:29 ratio for home-based and satellite herds to a 34:66 ratio within seven months.

The following recommendations were forwarded to cattle populations fleeing drought based on the introduction, review of associated literature, and conclusion. Increased land degradation, conflicts over finite resources, restricted access to (knowledge, education, skills, and financial services), poor government policies, and population pressures are all important obstacles for pastoralist drought response techniques. There is still limited research regarding the impacts of climate change on livestock production. Interactions between climate change and livestock production are still not well understood, despite the amount of research performed. Governments should pay attention to and support technical innovation, particularly in the area of forage reservation. In drought-prone areas, pastoralists must be aware that drought incidence is dependent on the season in order to protect their animals from starvation, vector-borne disease, and tse-tse fly infestation. During the season, the local community should establish coping techniques for evacuating cattle from drought by traveling from place to place in the best climatic conditions and gaining access to feed. Finally, including climate data into the existing application of adaptation and mitigation approaches based on location and livestock system may improve the study's trajectory in the future.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors state that they have no known competing financial interests or personal ties that may have influenced the work presented in this study.

Funding statement

This review article received no specific support from public, commercial, or non-profit funding entities.

Data availability

On the request of an online user, data will be made available.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Public interest statement

Drought is one of the elements of weather and climate extremes, and it happens when the natural water supply is lower than usual, leading to problems with the availability of water. The biggest population of livestock in Africa lives in Ethiopia, which are also the continent's leading producer and exporter of livestock. Weather-related droughts have the potential to lower agricultural productivity by decreasing the amount of moisture in the soil. The most susceptible pastoral communities that depend on extensive livestock production systems in dry regions are predicted to be the most affected by climate change. In the past, droughts have resulted in significant loss of life and property as well as significant population displacement. Increasingly frequent droughts pose a challenge to the pastoralists' ability to cope and be resilient, and in particular, the Borana Southern region of Ethiopia was extremely sensitive to drought weather and climate extremes in the period between 2021 and 2022.

References

  • Abebe K. 2017. Effect of climate change on nutritional supply to livestock production. Acad. Res. J. Agri. Sci. Res. 5(2):98–106.
  • Adams R, Hurd B, Lenhart S, Leary N. 1998. Effects of global climate change on agriculture: an interpretative review. Inter-Research. 11:19–30.
  • Adger N, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson R, Naess O, Wolf J, Wreford A. 2009. Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?. Clim Change. 93:335–354.
  • Adger WN, Benjaminsen TA, Brown K, Svarstad H. 2000. Advancing a Political Ecology of Global Environmental Discourse.
  • Akhila JS, Shyamjith D, Alwar CM. 2007. Acute toxicity studies and determination of median lethal dose. Curr. Sci. 2007(93):917–920.
  • Akhtar N, Ishak M, Ahmad M, Umar K, Yusuff MM, Anees M, Qadir A, Almanasir YA. 2021. Modification of the water quality Index (WQI) process for simple calculation using the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method: A review. Water (Basel). 13:905.
  • Aklilu A, Desalegn W, Mesfin K, Negash T. 2013. Climate change impacts on pastoral women in Ethiopia: some evidences from the southern lowlands. PHE Ethiopia Consortium. 1–6p.
  • Aklilu Y, Wekesa M. 2002. Drought, Livestock and Livelihoods: Lessons from the 1999–2001 Emergency Response in the Pastoral Sector in Kenya, Network Paper 40.
  • Antonio M, Dario M, Federico P, Alessandro DC, Lanfranco S, Luigi d, Francisco CR, Susana D, Carlo B, Vanda A. 2013. Analysis of historic events in terms of socio-economic and environmental impacts.
  • AU-IBAR. 2016. Livestock Policy Landscape in Africa: A Review. Reinforcing Veterinary Governance in Africa. Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Bellarby J, Tirado R, Leip A, Weiss F, Lesschen JP, Smith P. 2013. Livestock greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential in Europe. Glb Chg Bio. 19:3–18.
  • Berihu H, Aleme A, Mulata H. 2014. Constraints of livestock development in eastern zone of tigray; the case of “GantaAfeshumWoreda” northern Ethiopia.agricultural science. Engineering and Technology Research. 2(1):1–9.
  • Berry H, Kelly B, Hanigan I, McMichael A, Welsh J, Kjellstrom T. 2008. Rural mental health impacts of climate change, paper commissioned for the Garnaut Climate Change Review (interim report to the Australian, state and territory governments of Australia), Garnaut Review Secretariat, Melbourne.
  • Boru D, Schwartz M, Kam M, Degen A. 2014. Cattle reduction and livestock diversification among Borana pastoralists in southern Ethiopia. Nomadic Peoples. 18(1):115–145.
  • Brida A-B, Owiyo T, Sokona Y. 2013. Loss and damage from the double blow of flood and drought in Mozambique. International Journal of Global Warming. 5:514–531.
  • Brown T, Teshome A. 2007. Implementing Policies for Chronic Poverty in Ethiopia. Background Paper for the Chronic Poverty Report 2008-09. United Kingdom's Department for International Development (DFID).Accessed on 17/07/10. 10:30.
  • Cammalleri C, Vogt J, Salamon P. 2017. Development of an operational low-flow index for hydrological drought monitoring over Europe. Hydrol. Sci. J. 62(3):346–358.
  • Central Statistical Agency (CSA). 2007. Human population census of Ethiopia 2007. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia.
  • Chang TJ. 1991. Investigation of precipitation droughts by use of kriging method. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 117(6):935–943.
  • Coffey S. 2008. A Systems Approach to Climate Change Impacts on Livestock Production. Paper prepared for presentation at the “Agriculture in A Changing Climate: The New International Research Frontier” conference conducted by the Crawford Fund for International Agricultural Research, Parliament House, Canberra, Australia, September 3, 2008. 39-48p.
  • Cooper PJM, Dimes J, Rao KPC, Shapiro B, Shiferaw B, Twomlow S. 2008. Coping better with current climatic variability in the rain-fed farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa: An essential first step in adapting to future climate change? Agric Ecosyst Environ. 126:24–35.
  • CSA (Central Statistical Agency). 2016. Agricultural Sample Survey. Report on Livestock and livestock characteristics (Private peasant holdings). Statistical Bulletin 583.Central Statistical Agency Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa. Vol. II: pp. 194.
  • Debela N, Mohammed C, Bridle K, Corkrey R, McNeil D. 2015. Perception of climate change and its impact by smallholders in pastoral/agropastoral systems of borana, south ethiopia. SpringerPlus. 4:236.
  • Degene A. 1990. Environment, Famine and Politics in Ethiopia: A View from the Village. Lynne Rienner PublIcnisher.
  • Demeke F. 2006. Pastoralists Livelihoods Initiatives (PLI) Enhancing Afar and Borana Livelihoods Efforts (ENABLE): A Baseline Survey Report for Fentale and Borana Areas of Oromia Region, CARE Ethiopia, unpublished draft.
  • Denef K, Archibeque S, Paustian K. 2011. Greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. agriculture and forestry: A review of emission sources, controlling factors, and mitigation potential: Interim report to USDA under Contract #GS-23F-8182H.
  • Deressa T. 2006. Measuring the economic impact of climate change on Ethiopian agriculture: Ricardian approach. CEEPA Discussion Paper No. 21. South Africa: CEEPA, University of Pretoria.
  • Desta S, Coppock DL. 2004. Pastoralism under pressure: tracking system change in southern Ethiopia. Human Ecol. 32(4):465–486.
  • Devereux S. 2006. Vulnerable livelihoods in Somali region, Ethiopia, 1st ed. Brighton: Institute of Development studies at the University of Sussex.
  • Dickie A, Streck C, Roe S, Zurek M, Haupt F, Dolginow A. 2014. Strategies for mitigating climate change in agriculture: Abridged report. Climate focus and california environmental associates, prifadred with the support of the climate and land use Alliance. Report and supplementary materials available.
  • Diersen MA, Taylor G, May A. 2002. Direct and indirect effects of drought on south dakota’s economy. Economics Commentator. 432:26.
  • Disaster Prevention and Preparedness Commission (DPPC). 2002. Emerging food crisis in Afar Region and East Shewa Zone, Ethiopia.
  • Dong K, Dong X, Dong C. 2019. Determinants of the global and regional CO2emissions: What causes what and where? Appl Econ. 51(46).
  • Dracup JA, Lee KS, Jr PEG. 1980. On the statistical characteristics of drought events. Water Resour Res. 16(2):289–296.
  • Edwards B, Gray M, Hunter B. 2009. A sunburnt country: the economic and financial impact of drought on rural and regional families in Australia in an era of climate change. AustraliaN Journal of Labour Economics. 12:109–131.
  • Eltahir EAB. 1992. Drought frequency analysis of annual rainfall series in central and western Sudan. Hydrol Sci J. 37(3):185–199.
  • Ewonetu G. 2012. Identifing Major Constraints of Ground Water Use for Irrigated Crop Production: Fogera Plain, North Western Ethiopia; Project Paper; Cornell University: Ithaca, NY, USA.
  • FAO. 2011. Drought-related food insecurity: A focus on the Horn of Africa. Drought emergency. Emergency ministerial level meeting.
  • FDRE (Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia). 2001. Ministry of Water Resources. Abebe T, editor. National Meteorological Services Agency; p. 1–113.
  • FDRE (Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia). 2015. Ethiopia’s Climate Resilience Strategy for Agriculture and Forestry; Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Fereja GB. 2016. The impacts of climate change on livestock production and productivities in developing countries: a review. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH. 4(8):181–187.
  • FORTUNE. 2016. A Local News Paper. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. August 21, 2016. Georgis, W.T., 1997. El Niño and Drought Early Warning in Ethiopia. Post Doctoral Research Fellow National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder Colorado, USA Web site: http://www.academia.edu.html.
  • Fritze JG, Blashki GA, Burke S, Wiseman J. 2008. Hope, despair and transformation: climate change and the promotion of mental health and wellbeing. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2:1–13.
  • Gan TY, Ito M, Hulsmann S, Qin X, Lu XX, Liong SY, Rutschman P, Disse M, Koivusalo H. 2016. Possible climate change/variability and human impacts, vulnerability of drought-prone regions, water resources and capacity building for Africa. Hydrol. Sci. J. 61(7):1209–1226.
  • Garnett T. 2009. Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers. Environ Sci Policy. 12:491–503.
  • Gebremichael Y, Kifle M. 2009. Local innovation in climate-change adaptation by Ethiopian pastoralists. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Gerber P J, Mottet A, Opio C I, Falcucci A, Teillard F. 2015. Environmental impacts of beef production: review of challenges and perspectives for durability. Meat Sci. 109:2–12.
  • Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G. 2013. Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities. FAO, Rome.
  • Gizachew L, Shimelis A. 2014. Analysis and mapping of climate change risk and vulnerability in central rift valley of Ethiopia. African Crop Science Journal. 22(s4):807–818.
  • Guteirrez APA, Engle NL, De Nys E, Molejon C, Martins ES.. 2014. Drought preparedness in Brazil. Weather Clim Extrem. 3:95–106.
  • Headey DD, Taffesse AS, You L. 2012. Enhancing resilience in the Horn of Africa: An exploration into alternative investment options (IFPRI Discussion Paper 01176). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Heim RR. 2002. A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 83:1149–1166.
  • Horridge M, Madden J, Wittwer G. 2005. The impact of the 2002–2003 drought on australia. Journal of Policy Modeling. 27(3):285–308.
  • Hurst P, Termine P, Karl M. 2005. Agricultural workers and their contribution to sustainable agriculture and rural development.FAO, Rome. ftp://ftp.fao. org/docrep/fao/008/af164e/af164e00.pdf.
  • Integrated Vector Management (IVM). 2009. Institute for Environmental Studies Report on general characteristics of the Borana zone, Ethiopia R. Lasage, A. Seifu, M. Hoogland, A. de Vries. Intergovernmental panel on climate change (2007a) working group I. the physical Basis of climate change.
  • Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
  • Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2013a. Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. In: Stocker T.F., Qin D., Plattner G.-K., Tignor M., Allen S.K., Boschung J., Nauels A., Xia Y., Bex V., Midgley P.M, editor. Contribution of Working Group i to the fifth Assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; p. 1535.
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2008. Climate Change, summary for policymakers: a report of working group of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Montreal, Canada.
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2013b. Part of the Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The Physical Science Basis.
  • International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). 2009. Livestock and climate change. Draft thematic paper. January 12–13, 2009. Rome, Italy.
  • International Institute for Rural Reconstruction (IIRR). 2004. Drought Cycle Management: a toolkit for the drylands of the Greater Horn of Africa.
  • International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR). 2009. Drought risk Reduction framework and practices. Geneva: UNISDR.
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). 2010. Building climate change resilience for African livestock in sub-Saharan Africa - World Initiative for Sustainable Pastoralist (WISP): a program of IUCN - The International Union for Conservation of Nature, Eastern and Southern Africa RegionalOffice, Nairobi, March 2010, 48p.
  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2014. Pachauri, R.K., Allen, M.R., Barros, V.R., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., Church, J.A., Clarke, L., Dahe, Q., Dasgupta, P. and Dubash, N.K., 2014. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 151).
  • Iqubal A. 2013. Livestock husbandry A sustainable livelihood in Ethiopia.international journal of economy. Management and Social Sciences. 2(8):603–607.
  • Karamouz M, Rasouli K, Nazif S. 2009. Development of a hybrid Index for drought prediction: case study. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. 14:617–627.
  • Kassa B, Beyene F, Mangi W. 2005. Coping with drought among pastoral and agro-pastoral communities in Eastern Africa. J Rural Dev. 28(Winter 2005):185–210.
  • Kassahun A. 2003. Pastoralism and the need for future intervention in pastoral areas of Ethiopia.Annual Review on National Dry Land Agricultural Research Systems, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Kassahun A, Snyman H, Smit G. 2008. Impact of rangeland degradation on the pastoral production systems, livelihoods and perceptions of the Somali pastoralists in eastern Ethiopia. J Arid Environ. 72(7):1265–1281.
  • Kima SA, Okhimamhe AA, Kiema A, Zampaligre N, Sule I. 2015. Educating pastoralists and extension officers on diverse livestock diseases in a changing environment in tanzania. Pastoralism. 5:1–14.
  • Lautze S, Aklilu Y, Raven-Roberts A, Young H, Kebede G, Leaning J. 2003. Risk and Vulnerability in Ethiopia: Earning from the past, responding to the present, preparing for the future.
  • Linke AM, O’Loughlin J, McCabe JT, Tir J, Witmer FDW. 2015. Rainfall variability and violence in rural Kenya: investigating the effects of drought and the role of local institutions with survey data. Glob Environ Change. 34:35–47.
  • Luseno W K, Mcpeak J G, Barrett C B, Little P D, Gebru G. 2003. Assessing the value of climate forecast information for pastoralists: evidence from Southern Ethiopia and Northern Kenya. World Develop. 31(9):1477–1494.
  • Lybbert TJ, Barrett CB, Desta S, Coppock DL. 2004. Stochastic wealth dynamics and risk management among a poor population. The Economic Journal. 114(489):750–777.
  • MacDonald M, Simon J. 2011. Climate, food security and growth Ethiopia’s complex relationship with livestock.Policy Brief 3. Brighter Green.
  • Matiwos H, Eshetu M, Maryo M, Andualem D, Legesse A. 2022. Effects of climate variability on livestock productivity and pastoralists perception: The case of drought resilience in southeastern Ethiopia. Veterinary and Animal Science. 16. doi:10.1016/j.vas.2022.100240.
  • McSweeney C, New M, Lixcano G. 2007. Ethiopia – UNDP Climate change country profiles. FDRE (Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia) (2001).Ministry of Water Resources.Abebe T(ed), National Meteorological Services Agency. 1-113p.
  • Megersa B, Markemann A, Angassa A, Valle Zárate A. 2014. The role of livestock diversification in ensuring household food security under a changing climate in borana, Ethiopia. Food Secur. 6:15–28.
  • Mersha AA, van Laerhoven F. 2018. The interplay between planned and autonomous adaptation in response to climate change: insights from rural Ethiopia. World Dev. 107:87–97.
  • Mesfin W. 1984. Rural Vulnerability to Famine in Ethiopia: 1958-1977. New Delhi.
  • Meze-Hausken E. 2004. Contrasting climate variability and meteorological drought with perceived drought and climate change in northern Ethiopia. Clim Res. 27:19–31.
  • Mikayilov JI, Galeotti M, Hasanov FJ. 2018. The impact of economic growth on CO2 emissions in Azerbaijan. J Cleaner Prod. 197:1558–1572. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.269.
  • Ministry of Finance and Economic Development (MoFED). 2013. Growth and Transformation Plan, Annual Progress Report (2011/12).
  • Mintewab B, Di Falco S, Kohlin G. 2010. Explaining Investment in Soil Conservation: Weather Risk, Rate of Time Preferences and Tenure Security in the Highlands of Ethiopia, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • MLDF. 2015. Tanzania Livestock Modernization Initiatives United Republic of Tanzania: Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries and Development. http://livestocklivelihoodsandhealth.org/wp content/uploads/2015/07/Tanzania_Livestock_Modernization_Initiative_July_2015.pdf.
  • Mniki S. 2009. Socio-economic impact of drought induced Disasters on farm owners of nkonkobe local municipality. Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa: University of the Free State.
  • MoA (Ministry of Agriculture). 2011. Small-Scale Irrigation Situation Analysis and Capacity Needs Assessment; Natural Resource Management and Regulatory Department: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Moore AD, Ghahramani A. 2013. Climate change and broadacre livestock production across southern Australia. 1. impacts of climate change on pasture and livestock productivity, and on sustainable levels of profitability. Glb Chg Bio. 19(5):1440–1455. doi:10.1111/gcb.12150.
  • Morton J, Barton D, Hendy C. 2001. Drought Contingency Planning for Pastoral Livelihoods. Natural Resources Institute Policy Series 15.The University of Greewich, UK.
  • Mulu Berhanu Hundera. 2010. The Gendered Drought Coping Mechanisms: The study Among Pastoralist Communities, in Shinile District, Somali Region, Ethiopia.
  • Nagaraju A, Thejaswi A, Sreedhar Y. 2016. Assessment of groundwater quality of udayagiri area, nellore district, Andhra Pradesh, south India using multivariate statistical techniques. Earth Sci Res J. 20:1.
  • Nardone A, Ronchi B, Lacetera N, Ranieri MS, Bernabucci U. 2010. Effects of climate change on animal production and sustainability of livestock systems livest. Sci. 130(2010):57–69.
  • National Adoption programme of Action (NAPA). 2007. Ethiopia Climate Change National Adoption programme of Action (NAPA), Addis Ababa.
  • Ofgeha GY, Abshire MW. 2021. Spatio-temporal variability and trends in rainfall and temperature in anger watershed, Southwestern ethiopia. J Appl Geospat Inf. 5(1):462–472.
  • Oxfam. 2008. Survival of the fittest: Pastoralism and climate change in East Africa. Oxfam International. Briefing paper.
  • Palombi L, Sessa R. 2013. Climate-smart agriculture: sourcebook. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  • Pankhurst R. 1986. The History of Famine and Epidemic in Ethiopia Prior to the Twentieth Century. Addis Ababa: Relief and Rehabilitation Commission. Published in the USA. Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc, 1800 30th street, Boulder Colorado.
  • Pantuliano S, Mike W. 2008. Improving drought response in pastoral areas of Ethiopia.
  • Philip T, Mario H, Ade F, Okeyo M. 2007. Vulnerability, climate change and livestock research opportunities and challenges for poverty alleviation. Ed rege, peter jones and john McDermott. International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). SAT Ejournal. 4(1):1–23.
  • Prince SD. 2002. Spatial and temporal scales of measurement of desertification. In: Stafford-Smith M., Reynolds J.F., editor. Global desertification: Do humans create deserts? Berlin: Dahlem University Press; p. 23–40.
  • Regassa S, Givey C, Castillo E. 2010. The rain doesn’t come on time any more: Poverty, Vulnerability, and climate variability in Ethiopia. Part of a series of research reports written to inform the public debate on development and humanitarian policy issues.Oxfam International. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Reynolds C, Crompton L, Mills J. 2010. Livestock and climate change impacts in the developing world. Outlook Agric. 39:245–248.
  • Rich�� B, Hachileka E, Awuor C, Hammill A. 2009. Climate-related vulnerability and adaptivecapacity in Ethiopia’s Borana and Somali communities.Final assessment report.
  • Ripple WJ, Smith P, Haberl H, Montzka SA, McAlpine C, Boucher DH. 2014. Ruminants, climate change and climate policy. Nat Clim Change. 4(1):2–5. doi:10.1038/nclimate2081.
  • Robinson S, Strzepek K, Cervigni R. 2013. The Cost of Adapting to Climate Change in Ethiopia: SectorWise and Macro-Economic Estimates. ESSP working paper 53. 1-23.
  • Rosegrant MW, Fernandez M, Sinha A. 2009. Looking into the future for agriculture and AKST. In: McIntyre B.D., Herren H.R., Wakhungu J., Watson R.T, editor. International Assessment of agricultural knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD). agriculture at a crossroads. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 307–376.
  • Saidu O, Omedo B. 2010. Climate change, genetics of adaptation and livestock production in low input systems. 2nd International Conference: Climate, Sustainability and Development in Semi-arid Regions. August 16, Fortaleza - Ceará, Brazil.1-12p.
  • Sakadevan K, Nguyen ML. 2017. Advances in agronomy. Adv. Agron. 141:147–184.
  • Sandford S. 2006. Too many people, too few livestock: the crisis affecting pastoralistsinthe Greater Horn of Africa.Accessed at: http://www.futureagricultures.org/pdf%20files/Sandford_thesis.pdf.
  • Sasakova N, Gregova G, Takacova D, Mojzisova J, Papajová I, Venglovsky J, Szaboova T, Kovacova S. 2018. Pollution of Surface and GroundWater by Sources Related to Agricultural Activities. Front. Sustain. Food Syst, 2.
  • Saving Lives through Livelihoods. 2006. Critical Gaps in the Response to the Drought in the Greater Horn of Africa, HPG Briefing Note, 2006.
  • SERP. 1990. Assessment of drought impact in Hararghe Province of Eastern Ethiopia, Jigjiga, Ethiopia. Southern Eastern Rangeland Development Project of Ethiopia.
  • Shapiro BI, Gebru G, Desta S, Negassa A, Nigussie K, Aboset G, Mechal H. 2015. Ethiopia livestock master plan. ILRI Project Report. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).
  • Singh T, Wu L, Gomez-Velez JD, Lewandowski J, Hannah DM, Krause S. 2019. Dynamic hyporheic zones: Exploring the role of peak flow events on bedform-induced hyporheic exchange. Water Resour Res. 55:218–235.
  • Sivakumar MVK. 2014. Impact of natural Disaster in agriculture: an overview. Geneva, Switzerland: WMO.
  • Skinner D. 2010. Rangeland management for improved pastoralist livelihoods of the Borana of southern Ethiopia.MA thesis. Oxford Brookes University.
  • Speranza C, Kiteme B, Ambenje P, Wiesmann U, Makali S. 2010. Indigenous knowledge related to climate variability and change: insights from droughts in semi-arid areas of former makueni district, kenya. Clim Change. 100:295–315.
  • Spinoni J, Vogt JV, Barbosa P, McCormick N, Naumann G, Dosio A. 2018b. World drought projections based on CORDEX data. Geophysical Research Abstracts. Vol. 20, EGU 2018-9515, EGU General Assembly 2018.
  • Spinoni J, Vogt JV, Naumann G, Barbosa P, Dosio A. 2018a. Will drought events become more frequent and severe in Europe? Int J Climatol. 38(4):1718–1736.
  • Stark J, Ejigu M. 2011. Climate change and conflict in pastoralist regions of Ethiopia: Mounting challenges, emerging responses, CMM Discussion Paper No. 4, United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
  • Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T D, Castel V, Rosales M, Rosales M, De Haan C. 2006. Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organization.
  • Stringer LC, Scrieciu SS, Mark S, Reed MS. 2009. Biodiversity, land degradation, and climate change: participatory planning in Romania. Applied Geography. 29:77–90.
  • Thornton PK. 2010. Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Philos Trans R Soc, B. 365:2853–2867.
  • Thornton PK, Van de Steeg J, Notenbaert A, Herrrero M. 2009. The impacts of climate change on livestock and livestock systems in developing countries: A review of what we know and what we need to know agric. Syst. 101:113–127.
  • Tsegaye D, Moe SR, Vedeld P, Aynekulu E. 2010. Land-use/cover dynamics in northern Afar rangelands, ethiopia. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 139:174–180.
  • Udmale P, Ichikawa Y, Manandhar S, Ishidaira H, Kiem AS. 2014. Farmers׳ perception of drought impacts, local adaptation and administrative mitigation measures in maharashtra state, india. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 10:250–269.
  • Ulrichs M, Slater R, Costella C. 2019. Building resilience to climate risks through social protection: from individualised models to systemic transformation Disasters, 43, S368-S387.
  • USGS. 2016. A Climate Trend Analysis of Ethiopia. Famine Early Warning Systems (FEWS) Networkinforming Climate Change Adaptation Series. USGS Science for a Changing World. US Department of Interior. Fact Sheet 2012–3053.
  • Van L, Anne F. 2015. Hydrological Drought Explained, vol. 2 WIREs Water published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. July/August 2015.
  • Van Dijk AIJM, Beck HE, Crosbie RS, de Jeu RAM, Liu YY, Podger GM, Timbal B, Viney NR. 2013. Particle tracking and the diffusion-reaction equation. Water Resour Res. 49:1–6.
  • Vermeulen SJ, Campbell BM, Ingram JS. 2012. Climate change and food systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 37:195–222. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-020411-130608.
  • Washington R, Downing TE. 1999. Seasonal forecasting of African rainfall: Prediction, responses and household food security. Geogr J. 165(3):255–274.
  • Wassie B, Colman D, Bichaka F. 2007. Diversification and livelihood sustainability in a semi-arid environment: A case study from southern Ethiopia. J Dev Stud. 43(5):871–889.
  • Wassie B, Fekadu B. 2014. The impact of climate change on pastoral production systems. A study of climate variability and household adaptation strategies in southern Ethiopian rangelands.. WIDER Working Paper 2014/028.
  • Wei S, Bai ZH, Chadwick D, Hou Y, Qin W, Zhao ZQ, Ma L. 2018. Greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions and mitigation options from livestock production in peri-urban agriculture: Beijing – A case study. J Cleaner Prod. 178:515–525. World Bank, 2020. World development indicators. The World Bank. Available.
  • Wilhite DA, Hayes MJ, Knutson C, Smith KH. 2000. Planning for drought: moving from crisis to risk management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 36:697–710.
  • World Bank. 2002. Livestock & the environment: finding a balance.
  • World Meteorological Organization (WMO). 2007. The role of climatologically normal in a changing climate. WCDMP-No. 61. WMO-TD No. 1377. Organization 130.
  • Wright IA, Tarawali S, Blummel M, Gerard B, Teufel N, Herrero M. 2012. Integrating crops and livestock in subtropical agricultural systems. J Sci Food Agric. 92:1010–1015.
  • Yilma Z, Haile A, GuerneBleich E. 2009. Effects of climate change on livestock production and livelihood of pastoralists in selected pastoral areas of Borana, Ethiopia, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Sub Regional Office for Eastern Africa (FAO/SFE), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 32 p.
  • Zhang C, Liu S, Wu S, Jin S, Reis S, Liu H, Gu B. 2019. Rebuilding the linkage between livestock and cropland to mitigate agricultural pollution in China. Resour Conserv Recycl. 144:65–73.
  • Ziese M, Schneider U, Meyer-Christoffer A, Schamm K, Vido J, Finger P, Bissolli P, Pietzsch S, Becker A. 2014. The GPCC drought index – a new, combined and gridded global drought index. Earth System Science Data. 6:285–295.
  • Zwaagstra L, Sharif Z, Wambile A, de Leeuw J, Johnson N, Njuki J, Said M, Ericksen P, Herrero M. 2010. An Assessment of the response to the 2008–2009 drought in Kenya. A report to the European Union Delegation to the Republic of Kenya. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi.