Feminist Methodology and Gender Planning Tools: Divergences and Meeting Points

Abstract

In methodological terms, feminist methodology and gender planning tools move in opposite directions. Many of the tools used in gender planning tend to an empiricist epistemological orientation, characterized by a standardization of procedures and a preference for checklists, indicators, and measuring, whereas feminist academic circles have a predominantly critical attitude towards empiricism. Discussions in feminist methodology tend to question positivist scientific procedures and emphasize the importance of reflexivity. While recognizing the different requirements and goals of academic research and policy analysis in the area of gender, this article argues for more convergence in methodological terms, so that the two areas can enrich rather than oppose each other.