738
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The spectral radius of signless Laplacian matrix and sum-connectivity index of graphs

ORCID Icon &
Pages 191-196 | Received 19 Jan 2022, Accepted 17 Jun 2022, Published online: 06 Jul 2022

Abstract

The sum-connectivity index of a graph G is defined as the sum of weights (du+dv)1/2 over all edges uv of G, where du and dv are the degrees of the vertices u and v in G, respectively. The sum-connectivity index is one of the most important indices in chemical and mathematical fields. The spectral radius of a square matrix M is the maximum among the absolute values of the eigenvalues of M. Let q(G) be the spectral radius of the signless Laplacian matrix Q(G)=D(G)+A(G), where D(G) is the diagonal matrix having degrees of the vertices on the main diagonal and A(G) is the (0, 1) adjacency matrix of G. The sum-connectivity index of a graph G and the spectral radius of the matrix Q(G) have been extensively studied. We investigate the relationship between the sum-connectivity index of a graph G and the spectral radius of the matrix Q(G). We prove that for some connected graphs with n vertices and m edges, q(G)SCI(G)n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2.

AMS subject classification:

1. Introduction

Let G be a simple connected graph with vertex set V(G) and edge set E(G). The open neighborhood of vertex v is NG(v)=N(v)={uV(G)|uvE(G)} and the degree of v is dG(v)=dv=|N(v)|. A pendant vertex is a vertex of degree one. The maximum degree of G is denoted by Δ(G). Denote by, as usual, Pn, Sn, Kn and Cn the path, the star, the complete and the cycle on n vertices, respectively. A unicyclic graph is a connected graph with n vertices and n edges. A bicyclic graph is a connected graph with n vertices and n + 1 edges. The spectral radius of a square matrix M is the maximum among the absolute values of the eigenvalues of M. Let q(G) be the spectral radius of the signless Laplacian matrix Q(G)=D(G)+A(G), where D(G) is the diagonal matrix having degrees of the vertices on the main diagonal and A(G) is the (0, 1) adjacency matrix of G, see [Citation13]. We denote the spectral radius (of the adjacency matrix A(G)) of a graph G by λ1(G). A single number that characterizes the properties of the graph of a molecular is called a graph-theoretical invariant or topological index. The structure-property relationship quantity the connection between the structure and properties of molecules.

Topological indices have been used to give a high degree of predictability of pharmaceutical properties was tasted with the help of topological indices.

The Randić connectivity index [Citation14], R=R(G) of a graph G is defined as R(G)=uvE(G)1dudv.

This topological index has been successfully related to chemical and physical properties of organic molecules, and become one of the most important molecular descriptors. The sum-connectivity index of a graph G was proposed in [Citation16], which defined as SCI(G)=uvE(G)1du+dv.

The sum-connectivity index has been found to correlate well with π-electronic energy of benzenoid hydrocarbons. The Randić index and the sum-connectivity index found good approximate rather accurately the π-electron energy (Eπ) of benzenoid hydrocarbons. The correlation coefficients between SCI(G) and Eπ, and R(G) and Eπ are 0.9999 and 0.9992, respectively. The value of the correlation coefficient is 0.99088 for 136 trees representing the lower alkanes taken from Ivanciuc et al. [Citation10], it shows that the sum-connectivity index and original Randić connectivity index are highly intercorrelated molecular descriptors. The applications of the sum-connectivity index have been investigated in [Citation11, Citation12].

Some basic mathematical properties of the sum-connectivity index have been established in [Citation1, Citation2, Citation5, Citation11, Citation12, Citation15, Citation16].

Using the AutoGraphiX system, Hansen and Lucas [Citation8] gave a conjecture saying that if G is a connected graph having n4 vertices, then q(G)R(G){4n4nif 4n12,nn1if n13, with equality if and only if G is Kn for 4n12 and G is Sn for n13.

Motivated by the works of [Citation3, Citation8], we study the relationship between the sum-connectivity index SCI(G) of a graph G and the spectral radius of the signless Laplacian matrix Q(G). In particular, we prove the following theorems.

Theorem 1.

Let G be a connected graph with n9 vertices and m edges. If SCI(G)n1n+2(mn+1)n, then q(G)SCI(G)n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2 with equality if and only if GSn.

2. Preliminaries

In this section, we present known results, which will be used in the proofs of our theorems.

The following lemma due to [Citation7] gives an upper bound of the spectral radius of the signless Laplacian matrix, which is the main tool of our proof.

Lemma 1.

[Citation7] Let G be a connected graph with n vertices, m edges and let q(G) be the spectral radius of the signless Laplacian matrix of G. Then q(G)2mn1+n2 with equality if and only if G is Kn or Sn.

The following lemma due to [Citation9] gives an upper bound of the spectral radius of the adjacency matrix.

Theorem 2.

[Citation9] Let G be a connected graph G with n vertices, m edges and let λ1(G) be the spectral radius of the adjacency matrix of G. Then λ1(G)2mn+1 with equality if and only if G is Kn or Sn.

The following result comes from [Citation6].

Theorem 3.

[Citation6] Among the set of n-vertex unicyclic graphs with n5, SCI(G)2n+1+n3n+12 with equality if and only if GSn(n1,2,2).

The following bounds of the sum-connectivity index is well-known.

Theorem 4.

[Citation4] Among the set of n-vertex bicyclic graphs with n5, SCI(G)1n+2+n4n+2n+1+25 with equality if and only if GBn(n1,3).

The following results come from [Citation16].

Theorem 5.

[Citation16] If n5, then the star Sn is the unique graph with minimum sum-connectivity index among n-vertex graphs without isolated vertices.

Proposition 1.

[Citation16] Let G be a triangle-free graph with n vertices and m1 edges. Then SCI(G)mn

3. Proof of Theorem 1

In this section we prove our main result.

Now we consider graphs with n9 vertices, m edges with the sum-connectivity index at least n1n+2(mn+1)n.

Theorem 6.

Let G be a connected graph with n9 vertices and m edges. If SCI(G)n1n+2(mn+1)n, then q(G)SCI(G)n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2 with equality if and only if GSn.

Proof.

Since SCI(G)n1n+2(mn+1)n, we deduce from Lemma 1 that q(G)2mn1+n2 with equality if and only if G is either Kn or Sn. Hence, q(G)SCI(G)2mn1+n2n1n+2(mn+1)n=(n1n+2(mn+1)n)(n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2)n1n+2(mn+1)n=n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2.

Since for Kn we have m=n(n1)2, therefore, we get n1n+2(mn+1)n=n+n31n+2n. Note that SCI(Kn)=n2n24>n+n31n+2n for n9, hence, q(Kn)SCI(Kn)<n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2. For the graph Sn we have m=n1. Hence, SCI(Sn)=n1n=n1n+2(mn+1)n, therefore, q(Sn)SCI(Sn)=n3/2n1 which implies that q(G)SCI(G)n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2 with equality if and only if GSn.

In the next result, we will show that our theorem holds for trees and graphs satisfying the inequality mn+1+6n4.

Theorem 7.

Let G be a triangle-free graph with n9 vertices. Then

  1. If m=n1, then q(G)SCI(G)n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2 with equality if and only if GSn.

  2. If mn+1+6n4, then q(G)SCI(G)<n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2.

Proof.

By Proposition 1, we have SCI(G)mn. Assuming that g(m,n)=SCI(G)n1n2(mn+1)n, we get g(m,n)mnn1n2(mn+1)n=mn(n1)n2(mn+1)n=f(m,n)n.

We consider some partial derivatives of f(m, n), i.e. (1) f(m,n)m=n20.(1)

If m=n1, then f(m,n)=0 and g(m,n)0, hence SCI(G)n1n+2(mn+1)n. Therefore, by Theorem 6, we have q(G)SCI(G)n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2 and equality holds if and only if GSn.

If mn+1+6n4, then by Inequality (1) we can write mn(n1)n2(mn+1)n2n+6n4n8n2n>0, hence, we get g(m,n)0. Therefore, we have SCI(G)n1n2(mn+1)n. Since G is not Sn, by Theorem 6, we obtain q(G)SCI(G)<n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2.

Here, we solve our problem for the unicyclic graph.

Theorem 8.

Let G be a connected graph with n9 vertices and m = n edges. Then q(G)SCI(G)<n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2.

Proof.

If m = n, then G is a unicyclic graph and by Theorem 3 we have SCI(G)2n+1+n3n+12=4n+2(n1)n+1+n2+n2n2+n.

It can be checked that 4n+2(n1)n+1+n2+n2n2+n>n1n+2n holds for n2. Then from Theorem 6, we obtain q(G)SCI(G)<n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2.

Now, we solve our problem for the bicyclic graph.

Theorem 9.

Let G be a connected graph with n9 vertices and m=n+1 edges. Then q(G)SCI(G)<n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2.

Proof.

If m=n+1, then G is a bicyclic graph and by Theorem 4 we have SCI(G)1n+2+n4n+2n+1+25.

It can be checked that 1n+2+n4n+2n+1+25>n1n+4n holds for n6. Then from Theorem 6, we obtain q(G)SCI(G)<n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2.

From Theorems 7, 8 and 9 we obtain the best possible bound on q(G)SCI(G) for a connected graph G having n10 vertices.

Corollary 1.

Let G be a connected graph with n10 vertices. Then q(G)SCI(G)n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2 with equality if and only if GSn.

Proof.

Note that n+2n+1+6n4 for n10. From Theorem 7, the result holds if n10 and mn+2. By Theorems 8 and 9, the result holds for graphs G with m = n and m=n+1, and by Theorem 7, the result holds for graphs G with m=n1 with equality if and only if G is Sn.□

From Theorems 7, 8 and 9 we also know that if 6n9, then the only cases which remain unsolved are:

  1. n = 6 and m = 8, 9, 10;

  2. n = 7 and m = 9, 10;

  3. n = 8 and m = 10;

  4. n = 9 and m = 11.

Theorem 10.

Let G be a connected graph with n vertices and m edges. If

  1. n = 6 and m = 8, 9, 10;

  2. n = 7 and m = 9, 10;

  3. n = 8 and m = 10;

  4. n = 9 and m = 11,

then q(G)SCI(G)<n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2.

Proof.

From Theorem 5, we obtain the lower bounds on the sum-connectivity index of G. Hence, SCI(G)>2.3674542494839 if n = 6 and m = 8, SCI(G)>2.5600575949894 if n = 7 and m = 9, SCI(G)>2.7465084177844 if n = 8 and m = 10, SCI(G)>2.925 if n = 9 and m = 11, SCI(G)>2.2521355971461 if n = 6 and m = 9, SCI(G)>2.1575507653593 if n = 6 and m = 10 and SCI(G)>2.443331341521 if n = 7 and m = 10.

By Lemma 1, we obtain upper bounds on q(G). We get q(G)365 if n = 6 and m = 8, q(G)8 if n = 7 and m = 9, q(G)627 if n = 8 and m = 10, q(G)394 if n = 9 and m = 11, q(G)385 if n = 6 and m = 9, q(G)8, if n = 7 and m = 10 and q(G)253, if n = 6 and m = 10.

It is easy to verify that q(G)SCI(G)<n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2 for all these cases.□

From Theorems 7, 8, 9 and 10, we get the next result.

Corollary 2.

Let G be a connected graph with n vertices for 6n9. Then q(G)SCI(G)<n(n+2mn12)n(n1)+2m2n+2.

Finally, we solve our problem for connected graph with n=3,4,5.

Theorem 11.

Let G be a connected graph with 3 vertices. Then q(G)SCI(G)83 with equality if and only if GK3.

Proof.

For n = 3, there are only two non-isomorphic graphs: K3 and K3{e}, where eE(K3). We have SCI(K3)=32 and by Lemma 1, q(K3)=4, thus q(K3)SCI(K3)=83.

For K3{e} we obtain SCI(K3{e})=23 and by Lemma 1, q(K3{e})3, so q(K3{e})SCI(K3{e})=332. Hence q(G)SCI(G)83 for any graph G having 3 vertices with equality if and only if G is K3.□

Here, we solve our problem for connected graphs on 4 vertices.

Theorem 12.

Let G be a connected graph with 4 vertices. Then q(G)SCI(G)83 with equality if and only if GS4.

Proof.

The only graph with 4 vertices and 6 edges is K4, and the only graph with 4 vertices and 5 edges is K4{e}. Since SCI(K4)=6 and q(K4)=6 (by Lemma 1), we get q(K4)SCI(K4)=6<83. For K4{e} where eE(K4{e}), we obtain SCI(K4{e})=66+455, and from Lemma 1 we have q(K4{e})163, which gives q(K4{e})SCI(K4{e})=128591806273<83. We have two non-isomorphic graphs for m = 4, namely C4 and S4+{e}. We get SCI(C4)=2 and q(C4)143 (by Lemma 1), so q(C4)SCI(C4)73<83. Similarly, SCI(S4+{e})=255+1 and q(S4+{e})143, thus q(S4+{e})SCI(S4+{e})702853<83. There are two non-isomorphic graphs for m = 3, namely S4 and P4. We have SCI(S4)=32 and q(S4)=4 (by Lemma 1), thus q(S4)SCI(S4)=83. Also SCI(P4)=233+12 and q(P4)4 (by Lemma 1), thus q(P4)SCI(P4)3232413<83.

Here, we solve our problem for connected graphs on 5 vertices.

Theorem 13.

Let G be a connected graph with 5 vertices. Then q(G)SCI(G)554 with equality if and only if GS5.

Proof.

We consider the cases m=7,8,9,10. The only graph with 5 vertices and 10 edges are K5. Since SCI(K5)=522 and q(K5)=8 (by Lemma 1), we get q(K5)SCI(K5)=825.

The only graph with 5 vertices and 9 edges is K5{e} where eE(K5). We have SCI(K5{e})=324+677 and from Lemma 1 we obtain q(K5{e})152, which gives q(K5{e})SCI(K5{e})87725<825.

For m = 8 we have G=K5{e1,e2} where e1,e2E(K5). There are two nonisomorphic graphs having 8 edges. If e1 and e2 are adjacent, then SCI(K5{e1,e2})=24+62+477 and if e1 and e2 are not adjacent, then SCI(K5{e1,e2})=463. So, SCI(K5{e1,e2})24+62+477 and from Lemma 1 we obtain q(K5{e1,e2})7, which gives q(K5{e1,e2})SCI(K5{e1,e2})724+62+477=1728+614+4749<825.

For m = 7 we have G=K5{e1,e2,e3} where e1,e2,e3E(K5). There are four non-isomorphic graphs having 7 edges. If G[e1,e2,e3] is K3, then SCI(K5{e1,e2,e3})=6+24. If G[e1,e2,e3] is S4, then SCI(K5{e1,e2,e3})=55+62+377. If G[e1,e2,e3] is a path, then SCI(K5{e1,e2,e3})=62+255+277. If G[e1,e2,e3] is not connected (G[e1,e2,e3] is K2P3), then SCI(K5{e1,e2,e3})=255+566. Thus SCI(K5{e1,e2,e3})6+24 and from Lemma 1 we obtain q(K5{e1,e2,e3})132, which gives q(K5{e1,e2,e3})SCI(K5{e1,e2,e3})52613247<825<554.

For m = 6 we have G=K5{e1,e2,e3,e4} where e1,e2,e3,e4E(K5). There are three non-isomorphic graphs having 6 edges. If G[e1,e2,e3,e4] is C4, then SCI(K5{e1,e2,e3,e4})=1+263. If G[e1,e2,e3,e4] is a path, then SCI(K5{e1,e2,e3,e4})=33+66+455. If G[e1,e2,e3,e4] is not connected (G[e1,e2,e3,e4] is K3P2), then SCI(K5{e1,e2,e3,e4})=655. Hence, by , we can see that SCI(K5{e1,e2,e3,e4})62+255+12=X1 and from Lemma 1 we obtain q(K5{e1,e2,e3,e4})6, which gives q(K5{e1,e2,e3,e4})SCI(K5{e1,e2,e3,e4})1515+612+112<554.

Figure 1. Graphs with 5 vertices and 6 edges.

Figure 1. Graphs with 5 vertices and 6 edges.

For m = 5 we have G=K5{e1,e2,e3,e4,e5} where e1,e2,e3,e4,e5E(K5). There are three non-isomorphic graphs having 5 edges. By , we can see SCI(K5{e1,e2,e3,,e4,e5})66+255+1=X2 and from Lemma 1 we obtain q(K5{e1,e2,e3,e4,e5})112, which gives q(K5{e1,e2,e3,e4,e5})SCI(K5{e1,e2,e3,e4,e5})1633+4555+211<554.

Figure 2. Graphs with 5 vertices and 5 edges.

Figure 2. Graphs with 5 vertices and 5 edges.

For m = 4 we have G=K5{e1,e2,e3,e4,e5,e6} where e1,e2,e3,e4,e5,e6E(K5). There are three non-isomorphic graphs having 4 edges (see ). We can see SCI(K5{e1,e2,e3,,e4,e5,e6})455 and from Lemma 1 we obtain q(K5{e1,e2,e3,e4,e5,e6})=5, which gives q(K5{e1,e2,e3,e4,e5,e6})SCI(K5{e1,e2,e3,e4,e5,e6})=554.

Figure 3. Graphs with 5 vertices and 4 edges.

Figure 3. Graphs with 5 vertices and 4 edges.

References

  • Ali, A., Idrees, T. (2021). A note on polyomino chains with extremum general sum-connectivity index. Commun. Comb. Optim. 6: 81–91.
  • Ali, A., Javaid, M., Matejić, M., Milovanović, I., Milovanović, E. (2020). Some new bounds on the general sum–connectivity index. Commun. Comb. Optim. 5: 97–109.
  • Deng, H., Hanyuan, S., Balachandran, S., Ayyaswamy, S. K. (2014). On two conjectures of Randić index and the largest signless Laplacian eigenvalue of graphs. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 411(1): 196–200.
  • Du, Z., Zhou, B. (2009). On sum-connectivity index of bicyclic graphs. arXiv Preprint arXiv:0909.4577
  • Du, Z., Zhou, B, Trinajstić, N. (2010). Minimum sum-connectivity indices of trees and unicyclic graphs of a given matching number. J. Math. Chem. 47(2): 842–855.
  • Du, Z., Zhou, B., Trinajstić, N. (2010). Minimum general sum-connectivity index of unicyclic graphs. J. Math. Chem. 48(3): 697–703.
  • Feng Yu, L. G. (2009). On three conjectures involving the signless Laplacian spectral radius of graphs. Publ. Inst. Math. (Belgr.) 85(99): 35–38.
  • Hansen, P., Lucas, C. (2010). Bounds and conjectures for the signless Laplacian index of graphs. Linear Algebra Appl. 432(12): 3319–3336.
  • Hong, Y. (1988). A bound on the spectral radius of graphs. Linear Algebra Appl. 108: 135–139.
  • Ivanciuc, O., Ivanciuc, T., Cabrol-Bass, D., Balaban, A. T. (2000). Evaluation in quantitative structure–property relationship models of structural descriptors derived from information-theory operators. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40(3): 631–643.
  • Lučić, B., Nikolič, S., Trinajstić, N., Zhou, B., Ivaniš Turk, S. (2010). Sum-connectivity index. In: Gutman, I., Furtula B., eds. Novel Molecular Structure Descriptors - Theory and Applications I. Kragujevac: University of Kragujevac, pp. 101–136.
  • Lučić, B., Trinajstić, N., Zhou, B. (2009). Comparison between the sum-connectivity index and product-connectivity index for benzenoid hydrocarbons. Chem. Phys. Lett. 475(1–3): 146–148.
  • Milovanović, I., Milovanović, E., Matejić, M, Bozkurt Altıindaǧ, ŞB. (2021). Some remarks on the sum of the inverse values of the normalized signless Laplacian eigenvalues of graphs. Commun. Comb. Optim. 6: 259–271.
  • Randić, M. (1975). On characterization of molecular branching. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97: 6609–6615.
  • Xing, R., Zhou, B., Trinajstić, N. (2010). Sum-connectivity index of molecular trees. J. Math. Chem. 48(3): 583–591.
  • Zhou, B., Trinajstić, N. (2009). On a novel connectivity index. J. Math. Chem. 46(4): 1252–1270.