![Sample our Earth Sciences journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5930/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Earth-Sciences.jpg"})
Abstract
The reduction of landslide losses requires appropriate method to reveal prone areas, causal factors and future occurrence likelihood. This study compared the effectiveness of the Statistical Index (SI), Certain Factor (CF) and Frequency Ratio (FR) models on landslide susceptibility mapping for Rwanda. Historical record and extensive field surveys generated an inventory map of 336 points. Thereafter, 245 and 91 points were randomly selected for building susceptibility and validation, respectively. Ten causal factors: elevation, slope angles, aspects, lithology, soil texture, distance to rivers, distance to roads, rainfall, land use/cover and normalized difference vegetation Index were analyzed. The area under curve (AUC) method revealed the training accuracies of 89.2%, 85.3% and 82.1% for the FR, CF and SI methods, respectively. And the prediction accuracies were 88.7%, 83.9% and 80.2% for the FR, CF and SI methods, respectively. Therefore, the FR performed well in landslide susceptibility mapping over the study area.
Acknowledgment
The authors are grateful for the support in data collection and analysis from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Research Centre for Ecology and Environment of Central Asia.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data availability
All data used by this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.