This paper analyses volatility, persistence, predictability, correlation, comovement (or contagion risk) and sudden stop (reversibility) of capital flows (foreign direct investment (FDI), foreign portfolio equity investment, long-term and short-term debt flows) using time series econometric techniques for 24 emerging economies over 1970–2014. This is informative on the pattern and relationship between capital inflows, with implications for accommodating macroeconomic policies in countries receiving inflows. The paper also addresses the predictions of conventional theory, that differences are associated with the maturity of the capital (long-term vs. short-term), with the information-based trade-off model of Goldstein and Razin [(2006). An information-based trade off between foreign direct investment and foreign portfolio investment. Journal of International Economics, 70(1), 271–295], that differences are associated with the structure of the capital (equity vs. debt). In line with the latter, equity flows (FDI and portfolio) are less volatile and persistent, more predictable and less susceptible to sudden stops than debt flows. Contrary to conventional theory, short-term flows are not more volatile, but there is evidence that correlations and risks of contagion are strong within all capital flow components.
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes on contributor
Bilal Keskinsoy is a lecturer in economics at Anadolu University. Holds a PhD in economics and an MSc in economics and econometrics from the University of Nottingham. Earned BAs in business administration and economics from Yeditepe University.
Notes
1. Not just in case of emerging and developing countries but also for advanced nations capital flows are, at times, regarded as troublesome. The following excerpt (from a speech of the former US president, Bill Clinton) in Karolyi (Citation2004) exemplifies this: ‘ … it is now time for the world to take the next steps of implementing a new financial architecture and long-term reform of the global financial system. This should include steps to reduce the entire financial system's vulnerability to rapid capital flows … ’
3. There are also policy prescriptions to contain and control volatility and speculative activity in international financial markets and capital flows. In his presidential address at the conference of the Eastern Economic Association in 1978, Washington DC; James Tobin proposed a tax (credited to him as ‘Tobin tax’) on capital market transactions to mitigate excess fluctuations and stampedes across the markets and thus to serve as ‘sand in the wheels’ of international finance. Tobin (Citation1978) and Eichengreen, Tobin, and Wyplosz (Citation1995) formalize the idea, while Uppal (Citation2011) reviews its costs and benefits. José Manuel Barroso, then European Commission president, has called for a tax for similar purposes on financial transactions throughout the European Union or at least for the Euro Zone (Financial Times, 28 September Citation2011).
4. The view that FPEI is reckoned as a kind of short-term capital flow could be traced in Stulz (Citation1999) who states that in a positive feedback trading prevalent stock market environment highly liquid short-term financial instruments are open to volatility spawning speculative trading. Also see Sachs et al. (Citation1996) as well as ‘hot money’ on Wikipedia.
5. Information asymmetries in the model are envisaged to take place at two stages. At first stage there is a principal-agent kind of information asymmetry that exists between entrepreneurs and managers where the level of ownership reduces the costs and improves efficiency by mitigating the effects of information failures. The second stage information asymmetry arises between the current owner and the potential buyer when the former happens to sell prior to the maturity. The investor liquidity needs and preferences, instead of market conditions, determine the ‘liquidity shocks’ definition of the paper.
6. Under the assumptions of financial frictions and partial inalienability, Albuquerque (Citation2003) offers an FDI–non-FDI dichotomy for capital flow volatility profiles.
7. For instance, Liu et al. (Citation1999) quantify volatility by logarithmic growth rates of the series.
8. Cox and Sadiraj (Citation2010) argue that the coefficient of variation has poor normative and descriptive performance in risk appraisal and Polly (Citation1998) shows that there is size-related bias in the coefficient of variation. See also Sørensen (Citation2002).
9. Volatility of the cyclical component obtained from the partitioning through HP filter could also be seen analogous to the random component in Chari and Kehoe (Citation2003) and stochastic component in Acemoglu and Zilibotti (Citation1997).
10. Boyson, Stahel, and Stulz (Citation2010), Pukthuanthong and Roll (Citation2009), Bekaert, Hodrick, and Zhang (Citation2009), Bordo and Murshid (Citation2006) and Mauro, Sussman, and Yafeh (Citation2002) also employ principal component analysis to gauge comovement and contagion.
11. As stated in Wooldridge (Citation2002), achieving a -consistent estimator of β is possible by maximizing the partial (sometimes quasi, pseudo or only probit) log-likelihood function .
12. I opt to use the net liability balances as they constitute the data of interest. The idea is that, as Dornbusch (Citation2002) argues, when foreign financing to a particular sector is withdrawn (i.e. a sudden stop or reversal occurs) that means a capital outflow and not a substitution into other assets currently held by that sector.
17. The surmise has been developed and discussed around the concept of ‘debt intolerance’ in Reinhart, Rogoff, and Savastano (Citation2003), Reinhart and Rogoff (Citation2004), Eichengreen, Hausmann, and Panizza (Citation2007).
18. Three alternative unit root tests, (Dickey & Fuller, Citation1979; Phillips & Perron, Citation1988; Kwiatkowski et al., Citation1992), are employed to determine the order of integration of a series. The decision is made for a particular outcome (i.e. the order of integration) if the results from at least two tests are statistically equivalent. This is consistent with the account of Stock (Citation1994) that interpretation of the unit root tests is a matter of judgement. Results from unit root tests and correlograms with Q-statistics are in the appendix.
19. Similar observation qualitatively noted for portfolio equity flows in Stulz (Citation1999).
20. Similar and alternative definitions could be found in Bordo, Cavallo, and Meissner (Citation2010), Cavallo and Frankel (Citation2008), Honig (Citation2008), Hutchison and Noy (Citation2006).
21. Of the similar nature, frequency of sign changes in capital flows are given in Table 6.4 in Lipsey (Citation1999) and the number of sudden stops presented in the first tables in Honig (Citation2008), Hutchison and Noy (Citation2006) and in of Cavallo and Frankel (Citation2008).
23. Although investment effect of the country level debt overhang is documented to be ambiguous, the actual service of the debt is found to crowd out investment. See Bulow and Rogoff (Citation1990), Warner (Citation1992), in particular, Cohen (Citation1993).
25. For identical recommendations please refer to Eichengreen (Citation2000) and Cardoso and Dornbusch (Citation1989).
Karolyi, G. A. (2004). Does international financial contagion really exist? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 16(2–3), 136–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2004.tb00545.x
McKinnon, R. I. & Pill, H. (1998). International overborrowing: A decomposition of credit and currency risks. World Development, 26(7), 1267–1282. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00045-X
Eichengreen, B., Tobin, J., & Wyplosz, C. (1995). Two cases for sand in the wheels of international finance. The Economic Journal, 105(428), 162–172. doi: 10.2307/2235326
Uppal, R. (2011). A short note on the Tobin tax: The costs and benefits of a tax on financial transactions (EDHEC-Risk Institute Position Paper). Nice Cedex 3: EDHEC-Risk Institute.
Stulz, R. M. (1999). International portfolio flows and security markets. In M. Feldstein (Ed.), International capital flows (pp. 257–293). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Sachs, J. D., Tornell, A., & Velasco, A. (1996). Financial crises in emerging markets: The lessons from 1995. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1996(1), 147–198. doi: 10.2307/2534648
Albuquerque, R. (2003). The composition of international capital flows: Risk sharing through foreign direct investment. Journal of International Economics, 61(2), 353–383. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00013-8
Liu, Y., Gopikrishnan, P., Cizeau, P., Meyer, P., Peng, P., & Stanley, H. E. (1999). Statistical properties of the volatility of price fluctuations. Physical Review E, 60(2), 1390–1400. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.1390
Cox, J. C., & Sadiraj, V. (2010). On the coefficient of variation as a criterion for decision under risk. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54(4), 387–394. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2010.01.002
Polly, P. D. (1998). Variability in mammalian dentitions: Size-related bias in the coefficient of variation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 64(1), 83–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1998.tb01535.x
Sørensen, J. B. (2002). The use and misuse of the coefficient of variation in organizational demography research. Sociological Methods & Research, 30(4), 475–491. doi: 10.1177/0049124102030004001
Acemoglu, D., & Zilibotti, F. (1997). Was Prometheus unbound by chance? Risk, diversification, and growth. Journal of Political Economy, 105(4), 709–751. doi: 10.1086/262091
Boyson, N. M., Stahel, C. W., & Stulz, R. M. (2010). Hedge fund contagion and liquidity shocks. The Journal of Finance, 65(5), 1789–1816. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01594.x
Pukthuanthong, K., & Roll, R. (2009). Global market integration: An alternative measure and its application. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 214–232. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.12.004
Bordo, M. D., & Murshid, A. P. (2006). Globalization and changing patterns in the international transmission of shocks in financial markets. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(4), 655–674. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2006.03.001
Mauro, P., Sussman, N., & Yafeh, Y. (2002). Emerging market spreads: Then versus now. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(2), 695–733. doi: 10.1162/003355302753650364
Dornbusch, R. (2002). A primer on emerging market crises. In S. Edwards & J. A. Frankel (Eds.) Preventing currency crises in emerging markets (pp. 743–754). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Binici, M., Hutchison, M., & Schindler, M. (2010). Controlling capital? Legal restrictions and the asset composition of international financial flows. Journal of International Money and Finance, 29(4), 666–684. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2010.01.001
Neumann, R. M., Penl, R., & Tanku, A. (2009). Volatility of capital flows and financial liberalization: Do specific flows respond differently? International Review of Economics & Finance, 18(3), 488–501. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2008.04.005
Alfaro, L., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., & Volosovych, V. (2008). Why doesn’t capital flow from rich to poor countries? An empirical investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(2), 347–368. doi: 10.1162/rest.90.2.347
Schularick, M. (2006). A tale of two ‘globalizations’: Capital flows from rich to poor in two eras of global finance. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 11(4), 339–354. doi: 10.1002/ijfe.302
Kose, M. A., Prasad, E., Rogoff, K., & Wei, S.-J. (2009). Financial globalization: A reappraisal. IMF Staff Papers, 56, 8–62. doi: 10.1057/imfsp.2008.36
Dornbusch, R. (2002). A primer on emerging market crises. In S. Edwards & J. A. Frankel (Eds.) Preventing currency crises in emerging markets (pp. 743–754). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Chang, R., & Velasco, A. (2001). A model of financial crises in emerging markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 489–517. doi: 10.1162/00335530151144087
Martin, P. & Rey, H. (2006). Globalization and emerging markets: With or without crash? The American Economic Review, 96(5), 1631–1651. doi: 10.1257/aer.96.5.1631
Caballero, R. J., & Krishnamurthy, A. (2006). Bubbles and capital flow volatility: Causes and risk management. Journal of Monetary Economics, 53(1), 35–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.10.005
Aizenman, J., & Pinto, B. (2005). Overview. In J. Aizenman & B. Pinto (Eds.), Managing economic volatility and crises (pp. 1–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aghion, P., Bacchetta, P., & Banerjee, A. (2004). Financial development and the instability of open economies. Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(6), 1077–1106. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2003.12.001
Sarno, L. & Taylor, M. P. (1999a). Hot money, accounting labels and the permanence of capital flows to developing countries: An empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 59(2), 337–364. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3878(99)00016-4
McKinnon, R. I. & Pill, H. (1998). International overborrowing: A decomposition of credit and currency risks. World Development, 26(7), 1267–1282. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00045-X
Reinhart, C. M., Rogoff, K. S., & Savastano, M. A. (2003). Debt intolerance. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2003(1), 1–62. doi: 10.1353/eca.2003.0018
Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2004). Serial default and the ‘paradox’ of rich-to-poor capital flows. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 53–58. doi: 10.1257/0002828041302370
Eichengreen, B., Hausmann, R., & Panizza, U. (2007). Currency mismatches, debt intolerance, and the original sin: Why they are not the same and why it matters? In S. Edwards (Ed.), Capital controls and capital flows in emerging economies: Policies, practices and consequences (pp. 121–164). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431. doi: 10.2307/2286348
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics, 54(1–3), 159–178. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
Stock, J. H. (1994). Unit roots, structural breaks and trends (Chapter 46). In R.F. Engle & D. McFadden (Eds.), Handbook of Econometrics (Vol. IV, pp. 2739–2841). Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier.
Stulz, R. M. (1999). International portfolio flows and security markets. In M. Feldstein (Ed.), International capital flows (pp. 257–293). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Bordo, M. D., Cavallo, A. F., Meissner, C. M. (2010). Sudden stops: Determinants and output effects in the first era of globalization, 1880–1913. Journal of Development Economics, 91(2), 227–241. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.09.005
Cavallo, E. A., & Frankel, J. A. (2008). Does openness to trade make countries more vulnerable to sudden stops, or less? Using gravity to establish causality. Journal of International Money and Finance, 27(8), 1430–1452. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2007.10.004
Honig, A. (2008). Do improvements in government quality necessarily reduce the incidence of costly sudden stops? Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(3), 360–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.04.030
Hutchison, M. M., & Noy, I. (2006). Sudden stops and the Mexican wave: Currency crises, capital flow reversals and output loss in emerging markets. Journal of Development Economics, 79(1), 225–248. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.12.002
Lipsey, R. E. (1999). The role of foreign direct investment in international capital flows. In M. Feldstein (Ed.), International capital flows (pp. 307–331). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Honig, A. (2008). Do improvements in government quality necessarily reduce the incidence of costly sudden stops? Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(3), 360–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.04.030
Hutchison, M. M., & Noy, I. (2006). Sudden stops and the Mexican wave: Currency crises, capital flow reversals and output loss in emerging markets. Journal of Development Economics, 79(1), 225–248. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.12.002
Cavallo, E. A., & Frankel, J. A. (2008). Does openness to trade make countries more vulnerable to sudden stops, or less? Using gravity to establish causality. Journal of International Money and Finance, 27(8), 1430–1452. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2007.10.004
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1992). Liquidation values and debt capacity: A market equilibrium approach. The Journal of Finance, 47(4), 1343–1366. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04661.x
Aivazian, V. A., Ge, Y., & Qiu, J. (2005). The impact of leverage on firm investment: Canadian evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1–2), 277–291. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1199(03)00062-2
Bulow, J., & Rogoff, K. (1990). Cleaning up third world debt without getting taken to the cleaners. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(1), 31–42. doi: 10.1257/jep.4.1.31
McKinnon, R. I. & Pill, H. (1998). International overborrowing: A decomposition of credit and currency risks. World Development, 26(7), 1267–1282. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00045-X
Cardoso, E. A., & Dornbusch, R. (1989). Foreign private capital flows. In H. Chenery & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of Development Economics (Vol. 2, pp. 1387–1439). Amsterdam: North Holland.
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.