The African Commission on Human and People's Rights and the future African Court of Justice and Human Rights: Comparative lessons from the European Court of Human Rights

Abstract

This article focuses on two regional human rights systems — the system that exists in Africa and the mechanism that exists within the Council of Europe. It examines the development and specifics of each system to determine what lessons the African Commission and the future African Court of Justice and Human Rights can learn from the European model and its Court of Human Rights. The article also examines what can be learnt from the role of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the role of the present human rights court: the African Court of Human and Peoples' Rights. It examines the strengths and weaknesses of each system and the challenges that exist for each. The article also examines the experience of the European Commission, which is no longer in existence, in addition to European Court on Human Rights, which has taken over the functions of the Commission, to determine what can be drawn from their experiences. Issues examined include the institutional strengths and weaknesses of these bodies, state compliance with the decisions of the human rights institutions and the resources available to these bodies.

Keywords:

• European Court of Human Rights
• African Court of Human and Peoples' Rights
• African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights
• African Court of Justice and Human Rights
• European Commission on Human Rights

Notes

1. See further Zeleza P & P McConnaughay, ‘The struggle for human rights in Africa’ in Zeleza P & P McConnaughay (eds) Human Rights, the Rule of Law, and Development in Africa. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004. See also Ahmed An-Na'im A (ed.), Universal Rights, Local Remedies: Implementing Human Rights in the Legal Systems of Africa. London: Interights, 1999.

2. See Sarkin J, ‘The responsibility to protect and humanitarian intervention in Africa’, Global Responsibility to Protect, 2.4, 2010, pp. 371–387 and Sarkin J & Fowler C, ‘The responsibility to protect and the duty to prevent genocide: Lessons to be learnt from the role of the international community and the media during the Rwandan genocide and the conflict in the former Yugoslavia’, Suffolk University Transnational Law Review, 33, 1, Fall 2010, pp. 35–87.

3. See further Sarkin J, ‘The role of the International Criminal Court in reducing massive human rights violations such as enforced disappearances in Africa: Towards developing transitional justice strategies’, Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 11, 1, 2011, pp. 130–42.

4. Sarkin J, ‘Humanitarian intervention and the responsibility to protect in Africa’ in Zimbler D & J Okopari (eds) Africa's Human Rights Architecture Auckland Park, South Africa: Fanele (an imprint of Jacana Media), 2008, pp. 45–67.

5. Sarkin J, ‘The role of the United Nations, the African Union and Africa's sub-regional structures in dealing with Africa's human rights problems: Connecting humanitarian intervention and the responsibility to protect’, Journal of African Law, 53, 1, April 2009, pp. 1–33.

6. See further Matlary JH, Interventions for Human Rights in Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002.

7. See further Pratchett L & V Lowndes, Developing Democracy in Europe — An Analytical Summary of the Council of Europe's Acquis. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2004.

8. See further Robertson AH & JG Merrills, Human Rights in Europe: A Study of the European Convention on Human Rights. 4th ed. 2001; Harris DJ, et al., Law of the European Convention on Human Rights. 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005; Jacobs FG & RCA White, ‘The European Convention on Human Rights’, in Ovey C & R White (eds), 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

9. Buergenthal T, ‘The evolving international human rights system’, American Journal of International Law, 100.4, 2006, pp. 783, 792.

10. Shelton D, ‘The promise of regional human rights systems’, in Weston BH & SP Marks (eds), The Future of International Human Rights Ardsley, New York: Transnational Publishers, 1999, pp. 351, 356; Buergenthal T, ‘The evolving international human rights system’, American Journal of International Law, 100.4, 2006, pp. 783, 792.

11. Heyns C, W Strasser & D Padilla, ‘A schematic comparison of regional human rights systems’ African Human Rights Law Journal, 5, 2005, pp. 308, 311.

12. Mckaskle PI, ‘The European Court of Human Rights: What it is, how it works and its future’, University of San Francisco Law Review, 40, 1, Fall 2005, pp. 1, 13.

13. See further Barnidge Jr RP, ‘The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights: Addressing the right to an impartial hearing on detention and trial within a reasonable time and the presumption of innocence’, African Human Rights Law Journal, 4, 1, 2004, pp. 108–20.

14. Greer S, ‘What's wrong with the European Convention on Human Rights?’, Human Rights Quarterly, 30, 3, 2008, pp. 680–702, 701.

15. Eaton M & J Schokkernbroek, ‘Reforming the Human Rights protection system established by the European Convention on Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Journal 26.1, 2005.

16. Steiner HJ & P Alston, International Human Rights in Context, Law, Politics, Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 920.

17. Art. 31.

18. Ndulo M, ‘The African Commission and Court under the African human rights system’, in Akokpari J & D Shea Zimbler (eds), Africa's Human Rights Architecture. Johannesburg: Jacana, 2008, pp. 182, 206.

19. ‘Status on submission of state initial/periodic reports to the African Commission (Updated March 2008)’,<http://www.achpr.org/english/_info/statereport_considered_en.html> (accessed 15 August 2008).

20. Adedeji A, ‘NEPAD's African Peer Review Mechanism’, in Akokpari J, A Ndinga-Muvumba & T Murithi (eds), The AU and Its Institutions. Johannesburg: Jacana, 2008, pp. 241–69.

21. While the African Commission has a purely human rights focus the focus of the peer review process is much wider but does include a human rights review as well.

22. African [Banjul] Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, adopted 27 June 1981, OAU Doc. CAB/LEG/67/3 rev. 5, 21 I.L.M. 58 (1982), entered into force 21 October 1986, <http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/z1afchar.htm>.

23. Article 45(1)(b).

24. Greer S, ‘What's wrong with the European Convention on Human Rights?’ Human Rights Quarterly, 30, 2008, pp. 680–702, 682.

25. European Court of Human Rights Information document on the Court, September 2006, <http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/981B9082-45A4-44C6-829A-202A51B94A85/0/ENG_Infodoc.pdf>.

26. Greer S, ‘What's wrong with the European Convention on Human Rights?’ Human Rights Quarterly, 30, 2008, pp. 680–702, 682.

27. Viljoen F, ‘A human rights for Africa and Africans’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 30, 1, 2004–5, pp. 1–66, 8.

28. Mckaskle PI, ‘The European Court of Human Rights: What it is, how it works and its future’, University of San Francisco Law Review, Fall 2005, pp. 1, 13.

29. Hioureas CG, ‘Behind the scenes of Protocol No. 14: Politics in reforming the European Court of Human Rights’, Berkley Journal of International Law, 24, 2, 2005–6, pp. 718, 726.

30. ‘European Court of Human Rights budget 2008’.

31. Viljoen F, ‘A human rights for Africa and Africans’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 30, 1, 2004–5, pp. 1–66, 13.

32. Viljoen F, ‘A human rights for Africa and Africans’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, pp. 1–66, 16.

33. Viljoen F, ‘A human rights for Africa and Africans’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, pp. 1–66, 17.

34. Viljoen F, ‘A human rights for Africa and Africans’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, pp. 1–66, 21.

35. Viljoen F, ‘A human rights for Africa and Africans’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, pp. 1–66, 55.

36. Murray R, ‘Recent developments in the African human rights system 2007’, Human Rights Law Review, 8, 2, 2008, pp. 356–76, 357.

37. Atioureas CG, ‘Behind the scenes of Protocol No. 14: Politics in reforming the European Court of Human Rights’, Berkley Journal of International Law, 24, 2005–6, pp. 718, 726.

38. ‘European Court of Human Rights budget 2008’.

39. Affa'a Mindzie M, ‘The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights’, in Akokpari J and D Shea Zimbler (eds), Africa's Human Rights Architecture. Auckland Park, South Africa: Fanele, 2008, pp. 204, 206.

40. Pityana NB, ‘Reflections on the African Court on Human and People's Rights’, African Human Rights Law Journal, 4, 2004, pp. 121, 124.

41. Naldi GJ & KD Magliveras, ‘Reinforcing the African system of human rights: The protocol on the establishment of a regional court of human and peoples’ rights’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 16, 1998, p. 431.

42. Udombana NJ, ‘Toward the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights: Better late than never’, Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal, 3, 2000, p. 45.

43. Landsberg C, ‘The fifth wave of pan-Africanism’, in Adebajo A & IOD Rashid (eds), West Africa's Security Challenges: Building Peace in a Troubled Region. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2004, p. 117 at 124.

44. Akinseye-George Y, ‘Africa at the crossroads: Current themes in African law: VI. Conflict resolution in Africa: New trends in African human rights law: Prospects of an African Court of Human Rights’, University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review, 10, 2001/2002, pp. 159–75.

45. The Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights Establishing an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

46. Badawi IA, ‘Draft protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights: Introductory note’, African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 9, 1997, pp. 943–61.

47. The protocol was adopted by the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the Organization of African Unity (OAU), at its 34^th Ordinary Session, June 1998, in Ouagadougou, Burkina-Faso. The 15 countries were: Algeria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Gambia, Lesotho, Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Rwanda, South Africa, Senegal, Togo, Uganda, Ivory Coast and the Comoros, <http://www.achpr.org/english/_info/court_en.html>.

48. Mubunganzi J & A O'Shea, ‘An African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights’, South African Yearbook of International Law, 24, 1999, pp. 256–69; and Mutua M, ‘The African Human Rights Court: A two-legged stool?’ Human Rights Quarterly, 21, 2, 1999, pp. 342–63.

49. The judges are Justice Gérard Niyungeko (Burundi), President, Justice Sophia AB Akuffo (Ghana) Vice-President, Justices Bernard Makgabo Ngoepe (South Africa), Modibo Tounty Guindo (Mali), Fatsah Ouguergouz (Algeria), Joseph Nyamihana Mulenga (Uganda), Augustino SL Ramadhani (United Republic of Tanzania), Duncan Tambala (Malawi), Elsie Nwanwuri Thompson (Nigeria) and Sylvain Ore of Ivory Coast.

50. Application No. 001/2008.

51. African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights v. Libya, Provisional Measures, 25 March 2011.

52. Art. 9 of the Protocol.

53. Art. 3 of the Statute.

54. Art. 4 of the Protocol.

55. Art. 5 of the Protocol.

56. Algeria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Côte d'Ivoire, Comoros, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Libya, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mozambique, Nigeria, Niger, Rwanda, South Africa, Senegal, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia and Uganda.

57. Nkwame VM, ‘Tanzania: African court gears up to receive cases’, Arusha Times, 28 June 2008.

58. Art. 8(4).

59. Mckaskle PI, ‘The European Court of Human Rights: What it is, how it works and its future’, University of San Francisco Law Review, Fall 2005, pp. 1, 72.

60. Buergenthal T & Shelton D, Protecting Human Rights in the Americas 36 (3rd ed. 1996). Cited in Dinah Shelton ‘The Boundaries of Human Rights Jurisdiction in Europe’ 13 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 95, 2003, 152.

61. Beach D, Between Law and Politics: The Relationship between the European Court of Justice and the EU Member States. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing, 2001.

62. Atioureas CG, ‘Behind the scenes of Protocol No. 14: Politics in reforming the European Court of Human Rights’, Berkley Journal of International Law, 24, 2005–6, pp. 718, 726.

63. Greer S, ‘What's wrong with the European Convention on Human Rights?’ Human Rights Quarterly, 30, 2008, pp. 680–702, 682.

64. Mckaskle PI, ‘The European Court of Human Rights: What it is, how it works and its future’, University of San Francisco Law Review, Fall 2005, pp. 1, 17.

65. Mowbray A, ‘The creativity of the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 5, 1, 2005, pp. 57–79, 73.

66. Sottiaux S & G van der Schyff, ‘Methods of international human rights adjudication: Towards a more structured decision making process for the European Court of Human Rights’, Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 31, Winter 2008, pp. 115, 124.

67. Sottiaux S & G van der Schyff, ‘Methods of international human rights adjudication: Towards a more structured decision making process for the European Court of Human Rights’, Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, pp. 115, 124. See comparatively Eno RW, ‘The jurisdiction of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights’, African Human Rights Law Journal, 2, 2002, pp. 223–33.

68. Atioureas CG, ‘Behind the scenes of Protocol No. 14: Politics in reforming the European Court of Human Rights’, Berkley Journal of International Law, 24, 2005–6, pp. 718, 726.

69. Caflisch L, ‘The reform of the European Court of Human Rights: Protocol No. 14 and beyond’, Human Rights Law Review, 6, 2, pp. 403–15, 405.

70. Atioureas CG, ‘Behind the scenes of Protocol No. 14: Politics in reforming the European Court of Human Rights’, Berkley Journal of International Law, 24, 2005–6, pp. 718, 718.

71. Janis M, R Kay & A Bradly, European Human Rights Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 3.