Refocusing South Africa's economic diplomacy: the ‘African Agenda’ and emerging powers

Abstract

This article assesses the prospects for a clearly articulated economic diplomacy approach in South Africa's foreign policy. It argues that while South Africa's foreign policy has been to a considerable extent normatively grounded, it has failed to develop a coherent economic diplomacy that is based on focused and distinctly expressed priorities. This is a crucial gap that limits the country's ability to respond to regional and global changes, in particular those posed by emerging powers. The article identifies a number of gaps in South Africa's foreign policy approach and highlights its oblivion to global developments and geopolitical dynamics in the African continent. It sets out possible policy outlines for developing a clearer and stronger economic diplomacy. The building blocks for such an approach include the identification of strategic foreign policy priorities; greater institutional co-operation among agencies dealing with economic and foreign policy development; synergies between corporate strategies and government's foreign policy objectives; and the need for South Africa to develop a stronger leadership ambition in the African continent, both to contribute to Africa's development and to pursue its own economic interests. This ambition will require awareness of South Africa's own limitations, thus focusing the better part of its foreign policy on a limited set of countries that match strategic priorities.

Keywords:

• economic diplomacy
• government–business relations
• foreign policy
• corporate strategy
• Africa
• South Africa

Notes

1. Alden C & G Le Pere, ‘South Africa's post-apartheid foreign policy: from reconciliation to revival?, Adelphi Paper, 362, p. 8. The Hague: Institute for Security Studies, 2003.

2. Adedeji A, ‘South Africa and African political economy: looking inside from the outside’, in Adebajo A, A Adedeji & C Landsberg (eds), South Africa in Africa: The Post-apartheid Era. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 2007, p. 59.

3. Brown C, Understanding International Relations. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave, 2001, p. 49.

4. For detailed discussions and various conceptions on hegemony see Gilpin R, War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981; Keohane RO, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984; and Kindleberger CP, Depression in the World Economy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.

5. Habib A & N Selinyane, ‘South Africa's foreign policy and a realistic vision of an African century, in Sidiropoulos E (ed.), Apartheid Past, Renaissance Future. Johannesburg: SAIIA, 2004, p. 54.

6. This draws heavily on Wild L & PD William, ‘Redesigning UK foreign policy’, in Held D & D Mepham (eds), Progressive Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007, pp. 233–47.

7. Zizek S, In Defence of Lost Causes. London: Verso, 2008, p. 100.

8. Sidiropoulos E & T Hughes, ‘Between democratic governance and sovereignty: the challenge of South Africa's foreign policy’, in Sidiropoulos E (ed.), Apartheid Past, Renaissance Future. Johannesburg: SAIIA, 2004, p. 67.

9. Mahajan V, Africa Rising. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2008, p. 17.

10. Dlamini K, ‘South Africa in Africa: in whose interest’?, paper for the Harold Wolpe Memorial Seminar. Johannesburg: The Edge Institute, 9 March 2005, p. 3.

11. Cerny PG, ‘Structuring the political arena: public goods, states and governance in a globalising world’, in Palan R (ed.), Global Political Economy: Contemporary Theories. London: Routledge, 2002, p. 22.

12. Dlamini K, op. cit., p. 5.

13. Klare MT, Rising Powers, Shrinking Planet: The New Geopolitics of Energy. New York: Holt, 2009, p. 22.

14. Sirkin HL, JW Hermeling & AK Battacharya, Globality: Competing with Everyone from Everywhere for Everything. New York: Headline, 2008, p. 31; see also Lewis SW, Chinese NOCs and World Energy Markets: CNPC, Sinopec and CNOOC, report, James Baker III Institute for Public Policy & Japan Petroleum Energy Center, Rice University, March 2007.

15. See Hutton W, The Writing on the Wall: China and the West in the 21 ^st Century. London: Abacus, 2007.

16. See Brummer I, ‘State capitalism and the crisis’, Mckinsey Quarterly, July 2009, <http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Strategy/Globalization/State_capitalism_and_the_crisis_2403>, accessed 2 July 2009.

17. Nkomo AX, ‘Presentation by Ambassador Nkomo A.X. to the heads of mission (International Programme)’, Diplomatic Academy, Department of International Relations and Cooperation, Pretoria, 14 January 2009, p. 2.

18. Bayne N & S Woolcock, ‘What is economic diplomacy?’, in Bayne N & S Woolcock (eds), The New Economic Diplomacy: Decision-making and Negotiation in International Relations. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007, p. 262.

19. See Odell J, Negotiating the World Economy. Cornell: Cornell University Press, 2000.

20. See a survey of the new thinking in corporate strategy and sustainability in Hart SL, Capitalism at the Crossroads: Aligning Business, Earth and Humanity. New Jersey: Wharton School Publishing, 2007. See also Ghemawat P, ‘Sustainable advantage’, in Montgomery CA & ME Porter (eds), Seeking and Securing Competitive Advantage. Harvard: Harvard Business Review Books, 1991, pp. 34–5.

21. Rothkopf D, Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making. New York: Little, Brown, 2008, p. 122.

22. McGuire S, ‘Firms and governments in international trade’, in Hocking B & S McGuire (eds), Trade Politics. London: Routledge, 2004, pp. 276–7.

23. Klare MT, op. cit., pp. 17–25; Ghazvinian J, Untapped: Scramble for Africa's Oil. London: Harcourt, 2007, p. 292.

24. Mbeki T, ‘The state of the nation address, 8 February 2008, <http://www.info.gov.za/speeches/2008/08020811021001.htm>, accessed 13 January 2010; see also <http://www.info.gov.za/otherdocs/2008/apex-priorities0208.pdf>, accessed 13 January 2010.

25. Ghazvinian J, op. cit., p. 292.

26. For a discussion on the companies from emerging powers that are challenging established powers, see Sirkin HL, JW Hermeling & AK Bhattacharya, op. cit.

27. Adebajo A, A Adedeji & C Landsberg, South Africa in Africa: The Post-apartheid Era. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 2007, p. 19.

28. ANC (African National Congress), Reconstruction and Development Programme. Johannesburg: Umanyano, 1994, p. 119.

29. Adebajo A, A Adedeji & C Landsberg, op. cit., p. 18.

30. ANC (African National Congress), ‘A just world and a better Africa is a possibility’, Polokwane Discussion Document on International Relations, <http://www.anc.org.za/ancdocs/policy/2007/discussion/int_relations.pdf>

31. Sidiropoulos E & T Hughes, op. cit., p. 65.

32. Nye JS, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs, 2004, p. 11. According to Nye, soft power refers to, among other things, a country's political values and its foreign policies (when they are seen as legitimate and having moral authority).

33. Dlamini K, ‘Foreign policy and business in South Africa post-1994’, in Sidiropoulos E (ed.), Apartheid Past, Renaissance Future. Johannesburg: SAIIA, 2004, pp. 174–5.

34. Mahajan V, op. cit., pp. 38–9.

35. See Ghemawat P, op. cit., pp. 34–5.