441
Views
43
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Estimation of accuracy of patient-specific musculoskeletal modelling: case study on a post polio residual paralysis subject

, , , , &
Pages 745-751 | Received 16 Jul 2010, Accepted 24 Jan 2011, Published online: 11 Apr 2011
 

Abstract

For patients with patterns ranging out of anthropometric standard values, patient-specific musculoskeletal modelling becomes crucial for clinical diagnosis and follow-up. However, patient-specific modelling using imaging techniques and motion capture systems is mainly subject to experimental errors. The aim of this study was to quantify these experimental errors when performing a patient-specific musculoskeletal model. CT scan data were used to personalise the geometrical model and its inertial properties for a post polio residual paralysis subject. After having performed a gait-based experimental protocol, kinematics data were measured using a VICON motion capture system with six infrared cameras. The musculoskeletal model was computed using a direct/inverse algorithm (LifeMod software). A first source of errors was identified in the segmentation procedure in relation to the calculation of personalised inertial parameters. The second source of errors was subject related, as it depended on the reproducibility of performing the same type of gait. The impact of kinematics, kinetics and muscle forces resulting from the musculoskeletal modelling was quantified using relative errors and the absolute root mean square error. Concerning the segmentation procedure, we found that the kinematics results were not sensitive to the errors (relative error < 1%). However, a strong influence was noted on the kinetics results (deviation up to 71%). Furthermore, the reproducibility error showed a significant influence (relative mean error varying from 5 to 30%). The present paper demonstrates that in patient-specific musculoskeletal modelling variations due to experimental errors derived from imaging techniques and motion capture need to be both identified and quantified. Therefore, the paper can be used as a guideline.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflict of interests concerned with this present work.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.