264
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A multi-body dynamics study on a weight-drop test of rat brain injury

, &
Pages 602-616 | Received 12 Mar 2014, Accepted 07 Jan 2017, Published online: 16 Jan 2017
 

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI), induced by impact of an object with the head, is a major health problem worldwide. Rats are a well-established animal analogue for study of TBI and the weight-drop impact-acceleration (WDIA) method is a well-established model in rats for creating diffuse TBI, the most common form of TBI seen in humans. However, little is known of the biomechanics of the WDIA method and, to address this, we have developed a four-degrees-of-freedom multi-body mass-spring-damper model for the WDIA test in rats. An analytical expression of the maximum skull acceleration, one of the important head injury predictor, was derived and it shows that the maximum skull acceleration is proportional to the impact velocity but independent of the impactor mass. Furthermore, a dimensional analysis disclosed that the maximum force on the brain and maximum relative displacement between brain and skull are also linearly proportional to impact velocity. Additionally, the effects of the impactor mass were examined through a parametric study from the developed multi-body dynamics model. It was found that increasing impactor mass increased these two brain injury predictors.

Notes

1. The peak acceleration data reported in papers Li et al. (Citation2011a) and (Citation2011b) are slightly different. Referring to Li et al. (Citation2011b), the ratio of the mean peak accelerations would be 0.734.

2. Instead of using the drop height, the measured initial velocity of 6.14 m/s (Li et al. (Citation2011a)) and the second equation in Equation (Equation3) for the skull were used in the estimation. The velocity loss was due to the dragging of the accelerometer cable and friction between the impactor and the tube as explained in Li et al. (Citation2011a). Without such a loss, the second equation in Equations (Equation3) and (Equation4) would be identical.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.