Comparative biomechanical analysis of instrumental fixations of the degenerative thoracic spine: large diameter optimized screw versus cemented screw with standard diameter

J-E Loreta NCT + Site Alliance, Institut Ligérien de la colonne vertébral, FranceCorrespondence[email protected]

P. Camb Neurosurergy, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France

C. Peltierc ABS Lab, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France

C. Brequec ABS Lab, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France;d Institut Pprime, UPR 3346 CNRS – Université de Poitiers, ISAE-ENSMA, France

P. Rigoardd Institut Pprime, UPR 3346 CNRS – Université de Poitiers, ISAE-ENSMA, France;e Spine & Neuromodulation Function Unit. PRISMATICS Lab CHU, Poitiers, France

T. Vendeuvrec ABS Lab, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France;d Institut Pprime, UPR 3346 CNRS – Université de Poitiers, ISAE-ENSMA, France;e Spine & Neuromodulation Function Unit. PRISMATICS Lab CHU, Poitiers, France

Comparative biomechanical analysis of instrumental fixations of the degenerative thoracic spine: large diameter optimized screw versus cemented screw with standard diameter

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Comparative biomechanical analysis of instrumental fixations of the degenerative thoracic spine: large diameter optimized screw versus cemented screw with standard diameter

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature