377
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Criteria for using the Superpave gyratory compactor to design airport HMA mixtures

, , &
Pages 126-136 | Received 15 Oct 2010, Accepted 22 Aug 2011, Published online: 06 Oct 2011
 

Abstract

Asphalt concrete pavements for commercial airport applications in the USA are constructed according to guidelines in Item P-401, ‘Plant Mix Bituminous Pavements’, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circular 150/5370-10E. Item P-401 specifies the material characteristics and construction requirements for airport asphalt pavements, but does not currently provide guidance for using the Superpave gyratory compactor (SGC) in the preparation of specimens used in the design of hot mix asphalt (HMA) mixtures. Nearly all state departments of transportation in the USA use the SGC along with the Superpave mix design procedure. Since most HMA mixes are used in roadways, many asphalt contractors no longer maintain expertise and equipment for conducting the Marshall mix design procedure currently used by the FAA. The lack of contractors familiar with the Marshall method may become a significant problem for the FAA in the future. This paper describes a laboratory study of the HMA mix design for airport pavements, which uses the SGC. The purpose of the study was to determine the number of gyrations with the SGC needed to design asphalt pavement mixtures for airports. A value of 70 gyrations is recommended for further evaluations based on the comparisons of volumetric measurements of HMA mixture specimens compacted using Marshall compaction with specimens from the same mixture compacted using Superpave gyratory compaction.

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was supported by The FAA Airport Technology Research and Development Branch Under The FAA-ERDC Interagency Agreement. The contents of the paper reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented within. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views and policies of the FAA. The paper does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Permission to publish was granted by Director, Geotechnical & Structures Laboratory, ERDC.

Notes

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Thomas D. White

1

E. Ray Brown

2

Navneet Garg

3

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.