Abstract
A research focusing on the characterisation of representative local material properties was conducted to facilitate the full implementation of the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide for roadway designs in Wyoming. As part of the test program, falling weight deflectometer deflection data were collected from 25 test sites in Wyoming for back-calculation of subgrade resilient modulus. Also, subgrade materials from these test sites were sampled for laboratory resilient modulus measurement in accordance with the AASHTO T 307. The back-calculation is a user-dependent procedure and produces a non-unique resilient modulus estimation. To alleviate this limitation, this paper focuses on the recent development of a systematic back-calculation protocol for subgrade resilient modulus using MODCOMP6 software. The protocol is intended for use on a flexible pavement with a crushed base. The proposed procedure discusses pre-analysis checks, seed modulus adjustment, pavement structure adjustment and program termination criteria. A correlation study was conducted to correct back-calculated resilient modulus to laboratory-equivalent values. The results conclude that a non-zero intercept linear regression model provides a better correlation than the widely used zero intercept linear regression model. Furthermore, better correlations are achieved when the back-calculated resilient modulus of a lower subgrade layer and resilient modulus measured at higher laboratory test sequences Nos. 11 to 15 are considered. The non-zero model based on Mr test sequence No. 14 and lower subgrade layer yields the best correlation. For the zero model, a C-factor of 0.645 based on Mr test sequence No. 15 and lower subgrade layer yields the best correlation.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Wyoming Department of Transportation for sponsoring the research presented in this paper. We would like to thank the WYDOT’s engineers from the Geology and Materials Programs as well as the WYDOT’s field crews for their assistance in the field and laboratory test program. Special thanks to Zachary Hutson and Zachary Henrichs for their valuable input.