Asphalt fatigue endurance limit estimation and impact on perpetual pavement design

ABSTRACT

The National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 9-38 developed a method for estimating asphalt fatigue endurance limit (FEL) which employs bending beam fatigue (BBF) lives. Another project, NCHRP 9-44A, used BBF test data to formulate a healing-based FEL prediction model. Both procedures were evaluated in this study by utilising data from the National Center for Asphalt Technology Pavement Test Track. The estimated FELs were used in perpetual pavement design to investigate their impact on asphalt thickness. The NCHRP 9-44A-predicted FELs increased with longer rest periods, but largely stabilised after 8 s, which agreed with the NCHRP 9-44A researchers’ conclusion that no healing occurs after a rest period of 5–10 s. Overall, the NCHRP 9-38 method yielded greater FELs. Without binder modification and/or high binder content, both methods provided similar FELs, if a rest period longer than 5 s was entered in the NCHRP 9-44A model. Generally, the NCHRP 9-44A-predicted FELs produced thicker layers. However, for conventional asphalt mixtures, both sets of FEL yielded similar thicknesses, if the NCHRP 9-44A model applied a rest period exceeding 5 s. The NCHRP 9-44A model’s predictive capability will increase if it is recalibrated with mixtures containing modified binder and/or higher binder contents.

KEYWORDS:

• Fatigue endurance limit
• asphalt concrete
• fatigue cracking
• perpetual pavement design

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge NCAT Pavement Test Track sponsors, including the Federal Highway Administration, several state highway agencies and private sponsors.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).