420
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Mechanistic and microstructural characteristics of roller compacted geopolymer concrete using reclaimed asphalt pavement

&
Pages 4385-4403 | Received 08 Jan 2021, Accepted 11 Jun 2021, Published online: 29 Jun 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Mechanistic and microstructural characteristics of roller-compacted concrete (RCC) produced from recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) and geopolymer cement binder (GPC) were evaluated and compared with mixtures produced from ordinary Portland cement (OPC). It was found that RCC using geopolymer binder exhibited higher unconfined compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, and flexural strength as compared to the mixture containing ordinary Portland cement. It was also discovered that the mechanical properties of the developed concrete depend on mixture constituents: sodium hydroxide molarity, the ratio of sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide, curing temperature, and gradation of RAP. The experimental results showed that RCC using geopolymer binder exhibited compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, and flexural strength in the range of 8.4–21.1 MPa, 18.3–35.0 GPa, and 2.9–4.1 MPa, respectively. On the other hand, RCC using 12% OPC presented similar mechanical strengths of 13.2 MPa, 32.8 GPa, and 3.32 MPa, respectively. Regression analysis was also performed to establish the relationship between mechanical characteristics and various mixture constituents. Morphological and microstructural analysis proved the formation of geo-polymeric compounds. Based on the mechanistic characteristics, the developed roller-compacted RAP-Geopolymer concrete could be used as a strong pavement base in composite pavement system or wearing course of low volume roads.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express sincere thanks to the University of Louisiana at Lafayette for providing financial support and facility for the research. A special thanks are also extended to Mr. Mark LeBlanc for assisting in experimentation.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Author contributions

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Mohammad J. Khattak, and Sk Syfur Rahman; data collection: Sk Syfur Rahman; analysis and interpretation of results: Mohammad J. Khattak, and Sk Syfur Rahman; draft manuscript preparation: Mohammad J. Khattak, and Sk Syfur Rahman. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.