186
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Compaction method and specimen geometry effect on the fracture properties of asphalt concrete in the SCB test at intermediate temperature

ORCID Icon, , &
Article: 2381059 | Received 09 Jan 2024, Accepted 09 Jul 2024, Published online: 24 Jul 2024
 

ABSTRACT

Recent research using the semicircular bending (SCB) test with 100 mm diameter specimen cored from gyratory compacted samples demonstrated the suitability of this sample size for testing dense graded asphalt mixes with a nominal maximum aggregate size (NMAS) of up to 19 mm. Alongside the gyratory compactor, the Marshall compactor remains part of current specifications in many countries, including ASTM international standards. The Marshall compactor uses a 4-inch (101.6 mm) mould, which is slightly larger than the gyratory compactor’s 100 mm mould, and employs a different compaction effort, resulting in different aggregate orientation. This study investigates potential differences in the fracture properties of SCB test specimens compacted using different methods. Sample thicknesses of 30 , 40 , and 50 mm were evaluated in the SCB test at 25°C under a monotonic loading rate of 1 mm/min. A total of 81 specimens were prepared from three asphalt mixes with NMAS of 14 mm and 20 mm, including two dense graded asphalt mixes and one stone mastic asphalt mix. The fracture properties, including fracture energy, fracture toughness, and cracking resistance index (CRI) were evaluated. The study found that the repeatability, evaluated via the coefficient of variation, ranged from 1.1% to 21.7%, with an average value of 8.3%. A directly proportional relation was observed for indexes from the 100 mm and 150 mm samples using the gyratory compactor. The Marshall compactor specimens yielded higher fracture toughness and fracture energy values, while the CRI values were approximately 1.23 times those obtained from the gyratory compactor. This result shows that different compaction methods have direct effect on the fracture properties of SCB test specimens, emphasising the importance of considering compaction methods for the SCB test when determining the threshold value of cracking resistance for asphalt mixes, especially in the balanced mix design for asphalt mixes.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).