Abstract
A key recommendation of the recent NSW Pay Inquiry is that new legal and industrial prominence be afforded to the concept of undervaluation. Identifying the factors that contribute to undervaluation is a key task in pay equity proceedings, yet the methodologies to achieve this task are subject to debate. This paper outlines the research tools used in three case studies undertaken in the context of pay equity policy initiatives in NSW. The findings of each of the case studies illustrate the varied dimensions of undervaluation. Yet methodology remains but one challenge for pay equity activists. There are sharp differences in pay equity measures between the various industrial jurisdictions. At the federal level, action to initiate reform through industry awards is effectively denied, an exclusion that highlights the importance of those state system that remain capable of addressing pay equity through collective measures. However, reform of legislative and industrial frameworks alone will not instigate significant change in earnings differences unless joined by increased community-based political agitation.