247
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
EXHIBITION REVIEW

Two Faces: The National Portrait Gallery and Academia

Pages 119-126 | Published online: 22 Mar 2012
 

Abstract

In December 2008 the doors of the new Australian National Portrait Gallery were opened to the public. Visitor numbers quickly exceeded expectations and currently stand at over 1.5 million. In this paper it will be argued that the appeal of the portrait gallery relies upon the presentation of an accessible and relatively simple view of biography. This simple view is at odds with academic perspectives and revisionist scholarship which increasingly examines portraits as complex, dense and historically difficult images. Given the differences between popular and scholarly ideas of portraiture, this review considers viable and productive paths for collaboration between the National Portrait Gallery and academia.

Notes

*I would like to acknowledge and thank the Director of the NPG, Louise Doyle, and the Deputy Director, Michael Desmond, for discussing their views of the NPG with me. I also want to thank the anonymous referee for their pertinent comments.

1 The Carlyle Letters Online, Thomas Carlyle to David Laing, 2 May 1854, http://carlyleletters.dukejournals.org/

2Anna Gray, Face: Australian Portraits 1880–1960 (Canberra: National Gallery of Australia, 2010), 15.

3For the precursor exhibition to the National Portrait Gallery see Julian Faigan, Uncommon Australians: Towards and Australian Portrait Gallery (Sydney: Art Exhibitions Australia, 1992).

4Humphrey McQueen, ‘‘In for “Higher Art” I'd Go”: at the National Portrait Gallery’, Australian Book Review (May 2009): 41–3. This article is reproduced with a commentary on McQueen's website (webhttp://home.alphalink.com.au/~loge27/art_aust/art_aus_portraits_power.htm) and as this version of the article has sections that were not in the published edition I am using the online version throughout the review.

5John Thompson, ‘At the National Portrait Gallery: art or history?’, reCollections: A Journal of Museums and Collections 5, no. 1, http://recollections.nma.gov.au/issues/vol_5_no_1/notes_and_comments/.

6Richard E. Spear, ‘Art History and the “Blockbuster” exhibition’, The Art Bulletin 68, no. 3 (September 1986): 358.

7S. J. Freedberg, Gervase Jackson-Stops, and Richard E. Spear, ‘On ‘Art History and the “Blockbuster” exhibition’, The Art Bulletin 69, no. 2 (June 1987): 297.

8Charles W. Haxthausen, ed. The Two Art Histories: The Museum and the University (Massachusetts: Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, 2002).

9Harry Berger, ‘Fictions of the pose: facing the gaze of early modern portraiture’, Representations 46 (Spring 1994): 87–120 and Fictions of the Pose: Rembrandt Against the Italian Renaissance (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000).

10Elisabeth Findlay, ‘The authentic portrait reconsidered’ in Art & Authenticity, eds. Jan Lloyd Jones and Julian Lamb (Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing, 2010), 34–42.

11Paul Barlow, ‘The imagined hero as incarnate sign: Thomas Carlyle and the mythology of the “national portrait” in Victorian Britain’, Art History 17, no. 4 (December 1994) 517–45 and ‘Facing the past and present: the National Portrait Gallery and the search for ‘authentic’ portraiture”, in Joanna Woodall, ed. Portraiture: Facing the Subject (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997).

12Richard Brilliant, Portraiture (London: Reaktion, 1991).

13See Joanna Mendelssohn and Catherine de Lorenzo, ‘Institutional radicals: co-examining curatorial visions and art histories in Australia’, The International Journal of the Arts in Society 5, no. 2 (2010): 153–64 and Catherine de Lorenzo, Joanna Mendelssohn and Catherine Speck, ‘1968–2008: Curated exhibitions and Australian art history’, Journal of Art Historiography 4 (June 2011); 1–15.

14Andrew Sayers, ‘Curators and Australian art history’, Journal of Art Historiography 4 (June 2011): 1–10.

15Thompson.

16Andrew Sayers, Sarah Engledow and Wally Caruana, Open Air: Portraits in the Landscape (Canberra: National Portrait Gallery, 2008).

17National Portrait Gallery, Corporate Plan: Giving a Face to the Nation 2011–2014, http://www.portrait.gov.au/UserFiles/file/NPG%20CORPORATE%20PLAN%202011-2014.pdf.

18Thompson.

19Lynette Russell and Jane Lydon are the Chief Investigators on the ARC funded Aboriginal Visual Histories: Photographing Indigenous Australians, which is producing a systematic history of photography of Aboriginal people since 1841 (see http://arts.monash.edu.au/mic/research/visual-histories/).

20Melinda Hinkson, ‘Seeing more than black and white: picturing Aboriginality at Australia's National Portrait Gallery’, Australian Humanities Review 49 (November 2010): 5–28.

21Melinda Hinkson, ‘Seeing more than black and white: picturing Aboriginality at Australia's National Portrait Gallery’, Australian Humanities Review 49 (November 2010): 5–28.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.