Effect of Particle Size on the Wear Resistance of Alumina-Filled PTFE Micro- and Nanocomposites

Abstract

It was long supposed that the ability of hard particle fillers to reduce the wear rate of unfilled PTFE (typically ∼ 10^{− 3} mm ³ /Nm) by an order of magnitude or more was limited to fillers of microscale or greater, as nano-fillers would likely be encapsulated within the large microscale PTFE wear debris rather than disrupting the wear mechanism. Recent studies have demonstrated that nano-fillers can be more effective than microscale fillers in reducing wear rate while maintaining a low coefficient of friction. This study attempts to further elucidate the mechanisms leading to improved wear resistance via a thorough study of the effects of particle size. When filled to a 5% mass fraction, 40- and 80-nm alumina particles reduced the PTFE wear rate to a ∼ 10⁻⁷ mm ³ /Nm level, two orders of magnitude better than the ∼ 10⁻⁵ mm ³ /Nm level with alumina micro-fillers at sizes ranging from 0.5 to 20 μm. Composites with alumina filler in the form of nanoparticles were less abrasive to the mating steel (stainless 304) countersurfaces than those with microparticles, despite the filler being of the same material. In PTFE containing a mixture of both nano- and micro-fillers, the higher wear rate microcomposite behavior predominated, likely the result of the continued presence of micro-fillers and their abrasion of the countersurface as well as any overlying beneficial transfer films. Despite demonstrating such a large effect on the wear rate, the variation of alumina filler size did not demonstrate any significant effect on the friction coefficient, with values for all composites tested additionally falling near the μ = 0.18 measured for unfilled PTFE at this study's 0.01 m/s sliding speed.

KEY WORDS:

• PTFE
• Nano-Composites
• Wear
• Friction
• Self Lubrication
• Nanotribology
• Self-Lubricating Composites

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This material is based upon work supported under AFOSR-MURI grant FA9550-04-1-0367. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Air Force Office of Sponsored Research.

Presented at the STLE Annual Meeting in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, May 7-11 2006

Review led by Yeau-Ren Jeng