1,099
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

, , &
 

Abstract

This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to summarize the effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on insulin resistance (IR), lipid profiles, anthropometric indices, and C-reactive protein (CRP) level for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). We searched 8 databases from their inception until 1st October, 2020. The effect sizes were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Subgroup analyses were undertaken for further identification of effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics, based on the following aspects: (1) type of intervention (probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics); (2) study duration (≥ 12 weeks or < 12 weeks); (3) number of probiotic strains (multi strains or single strain); (4) probiotic dose (≥ 2 × 108 colony-forming units [CFU] or < 2 × 108 CFU). A total of 17 eligible RCTs with 1049 participants were included. Results showed that probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic intake decreased fasting plasma glucose (SMD, −1.35; 95% CI, −2.22 to −0.49; p = 0.002), fasting insulin (SMD, −0.68; 95% CI, −1.08 to −0.27; p = 0.001), homeostatic model of assessment for IR (SMD, −0.73; 95% CI, −1.15 to −0.31; p = 0.001), triglycerides (SMD, −0.85; 95% CI, −1.59 to −0.11; p = 0.024), total cholesterol (SMD, −1.09; 95% CI, −1.98 to −0.21; p = 0.015), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (SMD, −0.84; 95% CI, −1.64 to −0.03; p = 0.041), very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (SMD, −0.44; 95% CI, −0.70 to −0.18; p = 0.001), and increased quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (SMD, 2.00; 95% CI, − 0.79 to 3.22; p = 0.001). However, probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic supplements did not affect anthropometric indices, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and CRP levels. Subgroup analysis showed that probiotic or prebiotic might be the optimal choice for ameliorating IR or lipid profiles, respectively. Additionally, the effect was positively related to courses and therapeutical dose. Overall, the meta-analysis demonstrates that probiotic, prebiotic, or synbiotic administration is an effective and safe intervention for modifying IR and lipid profiles.

Author’s contributions

Y.L.L. and Y.T. conceived and designed the review. Y.L.L. drafted the paper. Y.L.L. and G.C.X. conducted the literature search and performed data extraction and quality assessment. Y.L.L. and J.Q.S. performed the statistical analysis. Y.T. critically revised the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Additional information

Funding

This systematic review was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81873333, 81674012) and Jiangsu Provincial Health Planning Commission Science, Education, and Health Strengthening Project: Jiangsu Provincial Clinical Medical Center of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine (YXZXB2016006).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.