Hybrid-DFT Study and NBO Analysis of the Stereoelectronic Interaction Effects (Associated with the Anomeric Effects) on the Conformational Properties of 2,3,5,6-Tetrahalo-1,4-dioxanes and Their Analogs Containing S and Se Atoms

Abstract

NBO analysis and hybrid density functional theory–based method (B3LYP/6-311+G**) was used to study the anomeric effects (AE), dipole–dipole interactions, and steric repulsion effects on the conformational properties of 2,3,5,6-tetrahalo-1,4-dioxane [halo = F (1), Cl (2), Br (3)], 2,3,5,6-tetrahalo-1,4-dithiane [halo = F (4), Cl (5), Br (6)], and 2,3,5,6-etrahalo-1,4-diselenane [halo = F (7), Cl (8), Br (9)]. B3LYP/6-311+G** results revealed a strong axial preference in compounds 1–3. Gibbs free energy difference (G _eq–G _ax) values (e.g., ΔG _eq-ax) between the axial and equatorial conformations of compound 1 to compound 3 are 8.19, 3.86, and 3.13 kcal mol⁻¹, respectively, as calculated by the B3LYP/6-311+G** level of theory. On the other hand, the NBO analysis of donor–acceptor (bond–antibond) interactions revealed that the AE for compounds 1–3 are −12.26, −16.46, and −18.11 kcal mol⁻¹, respectively. Contrary to the increase of the AE values from compound 1 to compound 3, the increase of the steric repulsions (e.g., 1,3-syn-axial repulsions) could fairly explain the decrease of the axial conformation stability in compounds 1–3 compared to their equatorial conformations. Further, the correlations between the AE, structural parameters, and conformational behavior of compounds 4–9 have been investigated.

Keywords:

• Ab initio
• anomeric effects
• molecular modeling
• NBO; 2,3,5,6-tetrahalo-[1,4]dioxane
• 2,3,5,6-tetrahalo-[1,4]diselenane
• 2,3,5,6-tetrahalo-[1,4]dithiane

Notes

^a Relative to the ground state.

^b Numbers in parenthesis are the corresponding thermodynamic functions values in kcal mol⁻¹.

^aSee Refs. 14 and 20.