A cost-effectiveness analysis of front-line treatment strategies in early-stage follicular lymphoma

Abstract

Recent data suggest the use of radiotherapy alone (RT) in Early-Stage Follicular Lymphoma is declining. Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments has not been performed. We constructed a partitioning model (15-year horizon) to compare RT, combined-modality therapy (CMT) and immunochemotherapy with rituximab maintenance (ICT + RM) from a PET-staged cohort from the Australian Lymphoma Alliance. Lifetime direct health care costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. AUD $75,000 was defined as the willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP). The direct healthcare costs were: RT $12,791, CMT $29,391 and ICT + RM $42,644. Compared with RT, CMT demonstrated minimal improvement in QALYs (+0.01) and an ICER well above the WTP threshold ($1,535,488). Compared with RT, ICT + RM demonstrated an improvement in QALYs (+0.41) with an ICER of $73,319. Modeling a 25% cost reduction with a rituximab biosimilar led to further ICER reductions with ICT + RM ($52,476). ICT + RM is cost-effective in early-stage FL from the Australian taxpayer perspective.

Keywords:

• Cost-effectiveness
• follicular lymphoma
• immunochemotherapy
• radiotherapy

Disclosure statement

PM: Advisory Boards: Celgene, Janssen and Amgen, Pfizer. Trial support: Janssen. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interest.

Additional information

Funding

The study was supported by an educational grant from Gilead (MKG) and the Mater Foundation.