Abstract
This article reports on a spring 1995 national survey of program deans and directors on liability issues in social work education. Areas explored included programs' use of field training agreements, legal actions involving students in field placements, and formal procedures for and litigation resulting from termination of students and faculty. Court decisions and accreditation standards are linked to the findings, and comparisons are drawn to a 1988 study. Program size, rather than level or location, was found to be the key factor in the formality and use of established procedures.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Sheldon R. Gelman
Sheldon R. Gelman is professor and Dorothy and David I. Schachne Dean, Daniel Pollack is assistant professor, and Charles Auerbach is associate professor, Wurzweiler School of Social Work, Yeshiva University, New York City.
Daniel Pollack
Sheldon R. Gelman is professor and Dorothy and David I. Schachne Dean, Daniel Pollack is assistant professor, and Charles Auerbach is associate professor, Wurzweiler School of Social Work, Yeshiva University, New York City.
Charles Auerbach
Sheldon R. Gelman is professor and Dorothy and David I. Schachne Dean, Daniel Pollack is assistant professor, and Charles Auerbach is associate professor, Wurzweiler School of Social Work, Yeshiva University, New York City.