Security Intelligence Networks and the Transformation of Contract Private Security

Abstract

This article explores the transformation of contract private security and security intelligence networks by drawing on results of a 2003 survey of contract security firms in Ontario, Canada. Comparing these results with a 1976 survey by Shearing et al. reveals a dramatic increase in the intelligence gathering and sharing capacities of contract security firms. This increased capacity can be put to various uses. The results of the 2003 survey permit the identification of three security intelligence networks that are constituted by this intelligence capacity: disciplinary networks, private justice networks, and multi-lateralized networks. These are differentiated by the type of intelligence provided and by the asymmetrical processes of intelligence provision to select security intelligence consumers. Security firms that share intelligence with their clients are less likely to share intelligence with police. Contract security consumers therefore largely determine the intelligence sharing practices of contract security firms.

Keywords:

• Private security
• Intelligence
• Networks
• Nodal governance
• History

The authors would like to thank Kelly Greenfield and Phil Boyle for their research assistance. Research for this article was supported by a three year research grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Notes

1. Club goods are goods that remain collectively available to a “club” but where non-members’ permanent access to the good can be wholly or partially denied, controlled or changed (Hope, 2000: 86, 101).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Daniel O'Connor

The authors contributed equally to the theoretical and substantive development of the article and lead authorship rotates with each paper derived from this research collaboration