Police clear‐up rates are published annually for each police force, and high values are often commended and thought to give an indication of the efficiency of the police. However this is misleading for several reasons. It has been shown that rates are inflated, in some forces, by the police questioning convicted and unconvicted prisoners ('prison visits'). It is contended here that these clear‐up rates in the present form should not be published, as comparisons between forces are invidious. Primary clear‐up rates (based on cautions and charges only) enable more valid comparisons to be made. However, these relate to suspects rather than offenders. It is suggested here that the ratio of offenders to recorded offences is a more consistent measure, but no single measure can be satisfactory unless there is a linkage between offence and court proceedings data.
Do we need a clear‐up rate?
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.